Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:39PM EDT
See Comments (13)
It looks as though stealing is the preferred method of music acquisition for most iPod owners, though they may couch it in gentler terms, like "sharing" with friends.
According to a recent study conducted in Britain by Jupiter Research, only 20 percent of the music tracks on a given iPod will be from the iTunes shop. The study said that the free music on the iPod came predominantly from CDs someone else already owned or were acquired from file-sharing sites. In other words, friends are passing music between each other. The study went on to find that 83 percent of iPod owners do not buy digital music regularly, meaning single tracks at least once a month.
I did some calculations and figured out that 20 percent of my 40GB iPod holds about 2,000 songs. Filling my entire 40GB iPod with paid music would cost about $2,000. Filing my entire iPod with songs would cost $10,000. Ouch. That's not going to happen anytime soon. Not by me, and certainly not by most young music listeners.
At the price of a download, most people will do a reasonable amount of buying at iTunes and a little bit of sharing with friends and family (not unlike the way we share books). A friend comes over and says "Listen, you've got to hear the playlist I made. You like it? Keep a copy." It's hard to say no to a good friend with good music.
What's interesting about the Jupiter study is that it acknowledges the fact that there is no line in the sand between people who steal and people who buy their music. Based on Jupiter's report, we are one and the same.
What do you think we can we do to provide incentives to buy, not steal music? Here are my two ideas and one from Microsoft:
Robin: Offer student discounts. Ninety-nine cents for a download is a hardship on most students. A 50 percent discount card might entice them to take advantage.
Allow legitimate pass-alongs. For my 99 cents, let me share my music with three other people at no cost to them. Let them keep the song. In the long run, companies that do this often make money.
Microsoft's variation on the theme comes by way of Zune, their newly launched MP3 player. Built in to every Zune device is a wireless music sharing system that can beam tracks, playlists, and images to other Zune players nearby. A shared track can be listened to three times on the friend's machine or kept for three days before it disappears.
Do you think people will start buying more digital music? Would you like to see more "pay to share" programs? What do you think it will take to get people to buy digital music?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
The world has changed. Recording studios and big movie houses are the bigger @#$%s - but so will we the consumers. With a lack of revenue, there will be less of an ability to attract, manage, and promote big stars. And lack of budgets for special effects. How will big studios pay for Lord of the RIngs or other King Kong size movies, once every kid obtains the software to convert DVD from Disk to video Ipod? THe answer is, they wont. We're living in the golden age of movies my friends, enjoy it while it lasts...
Most of the songs on my Ipod are from CD's that I bought. Seems to be this is the better way to buy music. This way I always have a back up copy in case my ipod files get corrupted. I always used to make a copy of my CD's for use in my car. That has always been an excepted practice. Now my Ipod is my primary listening device for music I buy. If anybody thinks this is stealing, they better revise their business model.
This all reminds me of the business-man who came across a boy selling apples on a street corner. "How much are your apples", asked the business-man? "$10,000 each", replied the boy. "That's a little pricey for one apple, don't you think?",quarried the man. "Yeah" replied the boy... "But I only have to sell one"! That story reflects the attitude of the recording companies. They're just flat charging too much for their product. If they were to LOWER
so what can this author recommend, buy a creative, iriver or samsung and subscribe to play for not so sure of microsoft or yahoo? people are buying ipods cause of their ease of use. the itunes/ipod helped this dying recording industry battle online piracy only to be accuse this way...unfair!
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by frankovision@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:02PM EDT Report Abuse
Yes it does cost to much to fill an ipod with music but i dont think that most people are stealing music. When i got my ipod i had maybe 50 cd's that i paid for and put them in itunes and then the ipod.That music was paid for and i feel that i should be able to do what ever i want with the music i paid for including transfer it to any computer that i authorize.If i paid for a cd and put in itunes then i should be able to do what ever i what with that music and i think that the artist are just greedy. I do not like websites that give away fee music but i what to control my own music without someone trying to say that it is stolen.Not all people steal music. Go after the websites that give it away for fee NOT ME.