The Unsung Bargain of the Flat Panel World

Mon Jan 7, 2008 5:30PM EST

See Comments (31)

Have I got a hot tip for you. I was speaking with Alfred Poor, author of the HDTV Almanac, and he convinced me that the best value/quality proposition, especially for bigger sized TVs, are rear projection models. Now hear me (and him) out before you say anything more.

Recently, Hitachi, Seiko/Epson, Philips, and Sony all bailed on rear-projection TVs. The companies are getting out of the business. That leaves Samsung, Panasonic, and JVC committed to the rear-projection market for now.

Poor's argument is that rear-projection TVs are great, however, they get a bad rap for a number of reasons. Retailers never display or discuss them well with customers because all of the demand is for LCD and plasma models. Rear screen is always thought of as a bulkier TV, but in fact it's not. New models are small and light enough to be placed on tabletops or inside home-entertainment centers. They use DLP, LCoS, or LCD technology instead of the bulky picture tubes that were so chubby. Barely deeper than the plasma and LCD models, the new ones, like the Samsung HL-S5087W 1080p DLP TV, feature a "hidden speaker," thin bezel design, and a 1080p picture.

Rear screen gets a bad rap because the old ones required that you replace the expensive lamp every few years. The older sets were also a bit dim because the projector lamp was not bright enough. New sets use better technology, like LiFi from Panasonic. Its light source won't burn out or lose brightness, and it gets bright quicker than most TVs. A 61-inch Panasonic LCD rear-screen system with 1080p sells for $2,200.

This week, Best Buy is selling the Panasonic PT56LCZ70 56-inch 1080p LCD rear-projection set with the solid-state LiFi lamp that never needs replacement for $996.99. Sony and Mitsubishi 52-inch 1080p flat-panel LCD HDTVs go for about $2,600 and up, and 50-inch 1080p plasma HDTVs go for about $2,300 and up. The 57-inch Mitsubishi DLP rear projection (1080p, but has a standard lamp) is $1,599.99 at Circuit City this week. These prices are about $1,000 less than smaller flat panels.

For more on why rear screens make sense, see Consumer Reports.

Retailers and marketers should get 30 lashes for not making rear-projection TVs the best alternative for those looking for low cost, large, and handsome TVs. They're too heavy to hang on the wall, but most people don't hang their TVs on the wall after all. And these babies have lost their baby fat.

Thanks for the tip, Alfred.

 

Top 5 Posts

Comments on The Unsung Bargain of the Flat Panel World

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by padfn on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    My understanding (via Consumer Reports) is that they still have a much higher failure (requires repair) rate than either LCD or Plasma. Until they improve on that, rear projection will continue to face challenges.

  • 2 Posted by smithj_33 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    Consumer Reports is not a reliable source for information. They are like CNet. They get kick back from some manufacturers and thus some reviews are somewhat biased. Reviews on the internet from real users are always your best bet.

  • 3 Posted by nolo_8 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    I still dont like Rear Projection tv's. I went to Circuit City and Best Buy all last week to get a new 42-50'' TV and considered getting a rear projection tv, but I really dislike the glare of it when you are looking at it from an angle. I ended up getting a 42'' Panasonic plasma, no glare, thinner, and standard definition looks really good on it.

  • 4 Posted by jimijam00 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    "Consumer Reports is not a reliable source for information. They are like CNet. They get kick back from some manufacturers.." Got proof?

  • 5 Posted by bdjorgensen on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree with above. The viewing angle of rear projections is terrible. Plasma is still the best value – especially in the 50in range.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.