Waterproofing Your Digital Camera

Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:01PM EST

See Comments (36)

The CES show in Las Vegas takes place in a high-tech oasis surrounded by a desert. As I wander the aisles with my camera, I can't help but wonder about the one that got away. For me, the one that got away is a camera, lost at sea. Two summers ago, while kayaking in Quebec, my wonderful Panasonic Lumix TZ10 camera, almost new at the time, slipped off the deck of my kayak and slid into the water. It was only beneath shallow water for seconds, but it was a fatal dip into the cold, salty, camera-hostile St. Lawrence Seaway.

The problem with cameras and waterproof bags are twofold. Either they are rigid boxes like the ones from OtterBox or they are bags that don't allow you to take a photo without removing the bag. But at CES my eye caught the DiCAPac booth, displaying a bathtub full of cameras, each housed in a protective waterproof case. Unlike the bulky and expensive hard plastic underwater cases that are designed for a specific type of camera or the bags you can't photograph through, the DiCAPac pouches are refreshingly generic and surprisingly inexpensive and useful. The pouch is clear plastic, modeled after the dry bags that canoeists and kayakers have used for years. The big addition is a polycarbonate lens opening that lets you take pictures even when the camera is in the pouch.

The camera controls are a bit hard to operate through the case, so you need to get most things set up ahead of time. For example, pressing the power switch or shutter is easy, but rotating a mode dial is pretty hard. These aren't really intended for serious scuba divers as the rated depth is only 5 meters, but they should be OK for some surface snorkeling or for use as protection against heavy rain or an accidental spill. And yes, if you drop the pouch into the sea, the camera will float. These waterproof pouches will work great or not so well, depending on your camera and needs.

The pouches that are in production now are in three sizes and shapes that will work for most point-and-shoot cameras and cost around $30. At that price, just get it because you'll need it if you want to photograph that rainy soccer game or you want to safely take the camera on a boat or kayak. They also were showing a pouch that would work for most SLR cameras, although it's not quite ready for sale, won't be available for a few months, and is at a higher price point (above $100). And slightly later they will have a pouch for a camera like my Canon Powershot Pro1, which is a sort of pro/am hybrid, larger than a point-and-shoot but not the size of most SLRs. I'll be visiting www.dicapac.com often, waiting for the announcement.

 

Top 5 Posts

Comments on Waterproofing Your Digital Camera

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by rngolf on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    I bought one of these in July, 2007 prior to a trip to Hawaii. Camera is a Canon Powershot SD1000 that goes everywhere with me. I agree that sometimes the camera controls were a bit difficult to manipulate, especially with a small camera. But overall, I was satisfied with this purchase and recommend it without reservations. I used it for underwater photos on 4 different occasions, and the pictures came out fine (my camera has an "underwater" mode) but more importantly the camera came out dry. At the time I bought mine, the information on the website was a bit unclear about which DiCaPac would fit my camera. But the reality is that if you just measure the camera and check the size of the bags, whichever it fits in will work fine. It's not so form fitting that millimeters matter. Overall, worth it!

  • 27 Posted by irish6004 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    I bought mine on Ebay about 6 months ago. Pretty cool, but dont expect miricles. Its pretty tough to operate the buttons when its sealed up in the bag, and its almost impossible to see the screen. The easiest way i found to use it was to put my camera on video-record mode and take underwater video.

  • 28 Posted by jcsrealty on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    ZIP LOCK BAGGY is what I use... You must think Americans are stupid!

  • 29 Posted by chickp415 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    I purchased DiCAPac this summer before I went on two cruises and it was one of my best purchases! I was going snorkeling with stingray and wanted to take pictures of the experience. My family thought I was crazy and that it wasn't going to work. Everyone thought the bag was going leak and I was risking my new camera. I proved them all wrong! The DiCAPac worked perfectly! I have amazing pictures from underwater with the stingray. It was also great to use when we were on the beach, camera was protected from the sand. I can recommend this DiCAPac to everyone!

  • 30 Posted by jsmith116100 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    I checked the prices for Ewa-Marine cases and the cheapest thing I saw was $85. Perhaps the $30 price tag for the dicapac was what impressed the author of this article. I will gladly pay $30 to protect a $200 camera, but I'm not sure I would go $85. I could buy a new camera for the cost of 2 cases.

  • 31 Posted by yodeljae on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    My sentiments with jsmith116100. $85 for a Ewa-Marine is very good. I didn't see anything for less than $150 on Amazon. The point here is, it has a polycarbonate (almost like glass) lense and costs just $30. Zip locks may work but don't have a clear lense. And c'mon, do underwater cases really need to cost $200 or so when they're all made in China for nickels and dimes. This is useful information for the common folks. Thank you.

  • 32 Posted by kdowden on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    My 17 yr old son is going canoeing at Boundary Waters this summer. I wanted to buy him an inexpensive camera that runs on AA-batteries but was concerned about waterproofing (10 days canoeing Great Lakes). This sounds like perfect solution. Thanks

  • 33 Posted by milantheplumber on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    Ewa Marine bags are expensive, because the incorporate real optics in-bedded into the plastic bag. In other words, you don't shoot through cheap plastic Zip-Lock bag but through real optical element. As a result, photos are sharper.

  • 34 Posted by renatom2k on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    Ewa Marine bags will cost more than my digital camera. Just checking eBay now to buy this digipac.

  • 35 Posted by gregsyak on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hire more editors like this. Information that saves me money, works, floats and has all positive feedback is the type of information I need. Negative comments from some people are just that. Must work for Ewa Marine or have excess money. I will probably purchase one for my new digital camera.

  • 36 Posted by ytech_robinraskin on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    So glad to have sparked this conversation. The DICApac stuff struck me because most of the kayakers I know use Otterbox or another hard sheck design and they are forever missing the shot. I've used dry bags that I keep on the deck of my boat but I still need to take the camera out of the bag to shoot. DICApa appeared to be an inexpensive waterproof(to a certain depth) alternative. EWA certainly appears to make a great product. Thanks for mentioning it. Here's the link http://www.keepitdrycase.com/ewdcdigcamca.html. It costs $289 and the DicaPac is $35 on Amazon. Keep those comments comin' --- Robin

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.