Fri May 19, 2006 12:54PM EDT
See Comments (5)
The scanner might be the Rodney Dangerfield of PC peripherals. It gets no respect, in part because we scan nondigital THINGS—books, papers, magazines, bills, birth certificates—but NEW THINGS are digital in their origins. Scanning is a way to get the old stuff into the new formats. And a scanner at the right time and the right place is invaluable. Here's a quick guide to world of scanners from basics to the finer points.
Microsoft offers an aging, but quick, one-pager on the basics of how to buy and use a scanner for anyone who just wants the cocktail party line on scanners.
If you want to sink your teeth into the subject, there's no place better than Wayne Fulton's scanning tips. He'll take you from the basics of how much resolution you want in a scan to the finer points of getting the scan clean and optimized.
Shopping for a scanner that'll work with photos and negatives (best for scrapbookers)? If it's related to digital photography you'll find reviews at Steve's Digicams. Imaging Resource stays up-to-date and ZDNet has a great roundup of the five top contenders for everyday scanners. If you just want to clear the pile of business cards off your desk, you'll look at scanners like these instead.
Genealogists are picky about scanners that can deal with aging photos, and anyone who's scanning an entire book might want to give a shout out to a scanning service (8 cents a page). Scanning a book? Here are some service bureaus that will do it for you.
Finally, if you bought your scanner but can't think of a thing to do with it, there are plenty of rainy day scanning ideas. The one that appeals most to me is scanning old documents in a file to reduce apartment clutter.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
hmmm...good idea but hard to do. I think to do it right you need a tripod, good lighting, possibly an easel and there's some lens distortion that makes them look funny. You sound as if you've been more successful at this than me. Maybe some tips to share?
Flatbed scanners are real cheap but for me a pain to use and large. Does anyone sell a fast autofeed scanner for under $100?? The Fujitsu ScanSnap S500 is wonderful but also $399!!! I scan official letters, checks, handwritten homework,etc. Scan and then toss the paper or file and not care that I can ever find it. I have a Visioneer Strobe Pro (actually two) that I got on Ebay for possibly $35 for the pair. They were parallel port and only work on Windows 98 AFAIK, but they are speed demons on Win98 and I keep my laptop as a dual booter so I can run that. One I converted to USB use for Windows 2000 and it is kind of slow doing the 300dpi B&W scans I mostly do.
I have a visioneer "One touch"5800 USBscanner.Which purchased 2 1/2 yrs ago. Have yet to use it ,because it tells me to unlock it .. There is no lock on the blasted thing . Cannot find anyone who will respond to tell me anything . Not vevn "Visioneer ".
I too have a Visioneer product '9420' purchased in May 2006. I have had no luck with this scanner, having changed from a previous version of Visioneer that did work. I was FORCED to upgrade because I had move up to win/xp pro. Yes, the lock situation is a MAJOR problem with this scanner, I have been unable to use it since July 2006. Visioneer has a KNOWLEDGE base, but refuses to give phone numbers or email addresses for assistance. I feel that this company is rather busy going to the bank each day. Been scanned, or is it 'scammed'?
The Logitech 1000 universal remote is a beautiful device, but it's a little on the overkill side if ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by zingarfi on Fri May 19, 2006 2:19PM EDT Report Abuse
Nearly everyone, with a computer, owns a digital camera. Why not simply photograph old documents and pictures? Film negatives and slides are a different matter. You will need a scanner for these. For legacy photos and current paper work, I simply photograph them using open shade lighting. Works for me because quality of my legacy photos is much below the digital camera image quality.