Part I: Do Flat-Screen TVs Consume More Power?

Tue Jan 2, 2007 6:47PM EST

See Comments (142)

Why is it that there's no such thing as an easy answer to a simple question when it comes to technology? Over the warm holiday weekend we had one of those "green" discussions, as I'm sure so many of you did. The questions posed were simple: Are the new LCD and plasma displays more energy efficient than old CRT screens? And, which is more energy efficient: plasma or LCD? (I'll cover this question in part II of my post.)

The answer depends on many things, including how you use your TV, when you bought it, and—most of all—how TV power consumption is measured today.

First, the question of new flat-screen TVs versus old cathode-ray TVs. Generally speaking, large-screen TVs consume more energy than the smaller-screened CRT-based TVs they replace. And most people are adding TVs. That is, they tend not to replace old TVs with new ones but add a second or third TV. And since TVs consume power even when they're not on, just adding a TV set or two can add dramatically to your power consumption.

A recent report by the BBC found that in the United Kingdom, plasma televisions, which it says are about 50 percent bigger than their cathode-ray-tube equivalents, "consume about four times more energy according to the government-funded Energy Saving Trust." And when looking at the carbon emissions from the power plants, the same group found that old-style TVs produce 100kg of climate-warming C02 per year, while larger, plasma screens will pump out 400kg from the plant. A recent report from Panasonic, makers of both LCD and plasma TVs, said that the new TVs consume more power than older CRTs, but the company is working to get the new TVs to be more energy efficient as fast as it possibly can.

Some of the best research can be found at EfficientProducts.org. The site says that a typical U.S. household watches about five hours of television each day and that there are about 260 million TVs in our homes. They claim that our TVs are responsible for about 1 percent of our nation's electricity production a year (47 billion kilowatt hours). Most of this electricity is consumed when the TV is turned on (90 percent), but the remaining 10 percent is used in standby modes when the set has been turned off. It predicts that unless TV efficiency improves, the rapid growth in TV sales, increased hours of TV viewing, and multiple TVs per household will ultimately contribute to a rise in TV energy consumption by about 50 percent before 2010.

OK, so much for new TVs replacing cathode tubes. It seems the new TVs consume more power. Now what about the different types of flat screens? Do you know which consumes more power? LCD or plasma? Keep reading to find out.

Top 5 Posts

Comments on Part I: Do Flat-Screen TVs Consume More Power?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 126 Posted by kanefig123 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    oh and u guys make it seem as if its bad to be green. you guys are a disgrace to america

  • 127 Posted by drepayton on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    In my humble opinion if you really need to worried about the price of energy price maybe you DO NOT need a Plasma or a LCD !!!

  • 128 Posted by iddings_richard on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    1%... People it's only 1%!! And I have no doubt manufactures will try to make their exisiting product more energy efficient... Not to reduce the power draw but rather so they can add more room for more features that may require additional power... And again... it's ONLY 1%... I'm sure if we were that concerned about power usage we would all switch to LED lightbulbs throughout our homes and offices... Make more energy efficient air/heating units... I'm sure the lights and signs in Vegas draw 1% too!

  • 129 Posted by inesica2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    wow!! something must be done with the energy efficency of the new TVs!

  • 130 Posted by vodkadp on Thu Jan 4, 2007 3:22PM EST Report Abuse

    Refrigerators and dishwashers use much much much much more energy....so watching my 50-in plasma costs me $5/mo rather than $2...who cares!

  • 131 Posted by gmcn2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    good argument.... in the UK, electrical equipment on standby consumes the same amount of energy as ALL the UK street lighting!! i suggest you put all equipment on the same multi-socket lead in each room and SWITCH OFF at night...save a lot of bills and air pollution!! g, cardiff, UK.

  • 132 Posted by joshandmelsmom on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    in response to zombiediefly2005. Wow! is it only ALL ABOUT YOU??? what about being unselfish enough to have a thought for the rest of the world??? The more electricity you consume the more you are helping to destroy the enviroment. for too long people (especially in the USA)have been thinking only of ourselves. I don't know about you, but I've been blessed with children and grandchildren and I don't want a stripped and destroyed earth to be MY legacy!!

  • 133 Posted by weatherman1977 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    It has a standby so the memory of your settings is not wiped out. Settings such as color, tint, Hue, contrast, and the auto programming which centers the screen and also adjusts the 16 focal points on the display. Using a setup DVD when you first plug in takes about 45 minutes to go through all these settings. If when you bought your HDTV you didn't go through these settings with a proffesional DVD the quality of your image is comprimsed. Now, if you want to go through a professional set up lasting 45 mins every time you turn on your set... Have Fun. Me, I will pay the extra 10% of the total power it uses. Chris

  • 134 Posted by k4avu on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    There is another problem besides a power eater for Plasma TV's. some produce RFI to receiving equipment, such as radio scanners & ham radio receivers. If you use the above items, better check with the store where you purchased your plasma tv, to see if you can return if for another model that does not interfere with other equipment. It is so strong in some cases, that it will interfere for several hundred feet.

  • 135 Posted by bob44x16 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yeah, I bought a large lcd flatscreen but I've also replaced all my house light bulbs with the low watt florecent type and dropped my hot water heater by 5 degrees. By doing that I've still lowered my energy consumption even with the LCD. ZING!!!

  • 136 Posted by daveingreatfalls on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wow, how much can you possibly over talk an issue?!!! Plug the various model sets into wattage meters and let them run for a week on identical times on/off. Post the results and find something else to write about. Comparing different size screens is not really fair, since the test should be based on same for same type features within a given screen size. If someone picks a larger screen, then compare it to a larger CRT. As with most "reports" lately, there is rarely an unbiased study performed.

  • 137 Posted by hallihan@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    The article is vague... Our old 32" CRT consumed 170w avg. Our new 46" LCD consumes 270w avg. Facts... LCDs consumes less watts than Plasma. A typical Plasma @ 42" 330w avg, 50" 470w avg, 65" 660w avg.

  • 138 Posted by cpeckaitis@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    I didn't realize this either until recently. So put my TV & stereo on power strips - and turn the strips off unless I'm using them. Slight inconvenience - but given 100% plus rate increases in my area, seems worthwhile.

  • 139 Posted by derekb246 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    would there be a problem if you just unplugged the tv every night and then plugged in, in the morning..that wouldnt throw anything off with the tv would it?

  • 140 Posted by willbonds on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    What's probably more important to realize is that SO MUCH additional energy is consumed by the TV support systems -- receiver, set top box, DVR, DVD player, etc. that run with the TV and also have their own standby power during the rest of a 24-hr period.

  • 141 Posted by kodachromekidd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    A couple of other things to consider. Most people keep their sets too bright, this actually increases the power consumption. So the factory spec becomes inaccurate if you decide to brighten your set since you are using more power. Additionally, I don't think these sets last as long as CRT's. As the flat screen ages, additional brightness may be required to get the same picture as before. Does that cause additional energy above and beyone as well? If so, then manufacture specs have to be aged over time as their peak efficiency may constantly be reducing over time. If they don't last as long as CRT's, then that also needs to be considered. Ironically, CRT's are still used for color correction because they pick up the lower end gray scale better than flat screen.

  • 142 Posted by leighpowell@btinternet.com on Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:28AM EDT Report Abuse

    yes the original article wasn't that useful, not comparing the same size screen seems a bit odd... far more interesting are the comments about green communists etc. very funny.... where were you in the eco-wars? as for the guy who reckons he's important because he has money, absolutely hilarious..... i secretly feel quite sorry for him poor sad little man! ( i think it was a man ) i too read on for more info.....Lx

More Posts: First Prev 6 7 8 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.