Part I: Do Flat-Screen TVs Consume More Power?

Tue Jan 2, 2007 6:47PM EST

See Comments (142)

Why is it that there's no such thing as an easy answer to a simple question when it comes to technology? Over the warm holiday weekend we had one of those "green" discussions, as I'm sure so many of you did. The questions posed were simple: Are the new LCD and plasma displays more energy efficient than old CRT screens? And, which is more energy efficient: plasma or LCD? (I'll cover this question in part II of my post.)

The answer depends on many things, including how you use your TV, when you bought it, and—most of all—how TV power consumption is measured today.

First, the question of new flat-screen TVs versus old cathode-ray TVs. Generally speaking, large-screen TVs consume more energy than the smaller-screened CRT-based TVs they replace. And most people are adding TVs. That is, they tend not to replace old TVs with new ones but add a second or third TV. And since TVs consume power even when they're not on, just adding a TV set or two can add dramatically to your power consumption.

A recent report by the BBC found that in the United Kingdom, plasma televisions, which it says are about 50 percent bigger than their cathode-ray-tube equivalents, "consume about four times more energy according to the government-funded Energy Saving Trust." And when looking at the carbon emissions from the power plants, the same group found that old-style TVs produce 100kg of climate-warming C02 per year, while larger, plasma screens will pump out 400kg from the plant. A recent report from Panasonic, makers of both LCD and plasma TVs, said that the new TVs consume more power than older CRTs, but the company is working to get the new TVs to be more energy efficient as fast as it possibly can.

Some of the best research can be found at EfficientProducts.org. The site says that a typical U.S. household watches about five hours of television each day and that there are about 260 million TVs in our homes. They claim that our TVs are responsible for about 1 percent of our nation's electricity production a year (47 billion kilowatt hours). Most of this electricity is consumed when the TV is turned on (90 percent), but the remaining 10 percent is used in standby modes when the set has been turned off. It predicts that unless TV efficiency improves, the rapid growth in TV sales, increased hours of TV viewing, and multiple TVs per household will ultimately contribute to a rise in TV energy consumption by about 50 percent before 2010.

OK, so much for new TVs replacing cathode tubes. It seems the new TVs consume more power. Now what about the different types of flat screens? Do you know which consumes more power? LCD or plasma? Keep reading to find out.

Top 5 Posts

Comments on Part I: Do Flat-Screen TVs Consume More Power?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 46 Posted by juergemj on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hey Sheinz1, it is clearly stated that there will be a rise by 50% in TV energy and not in overall energy consumption in the U.S by 2010. So that 1% will rise to about 1.5% in 2010 for TV energy consumption. Do you not read what you post. Also I purchase a 40" Sony LCD that is Energy Star rated and I have noticed a drop in my power consumption compared to when I had my old CRT 27". There has been a $10 drop in my bill per month during the same winter season.

  • 47 Posted by boredone37013 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    i did'nt have a "green" discussion this holiday. and "climate-warming C02" lmao!

  • 48 Posted by adityamokk on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    it should have bee short.its really boaring reading all the stuff.v were attracted to the question coz it was wat only a line and we jus wanted its answe in jus 10 lines

  • 49 Posted by redhatterb on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    One of our local channels has a brief program after the late news on Saturday nights about the HDTVs, and this man from one of the local TV dealerships was interviewed a couple weeks ago and he said that when you have HDTV the price of cable goes up a little too. And to think this was all started by the government, and in a couple years the only kind of TV people will be able to receive is HDTV. Something is fishy here---I wonder who will be getting the kickbacks. Myself I can put up with a less perfect picture, I don't even have stereo in my TV because I don't need it. I prefer to have my at home entertainment as cheaply as possible. When a person lives in an apartment and the biggest room is 12x12, you don't need a hugh TV I have yet to see a small sized flat screen TV in the stores in my area and when I am in a store and see the large screen TVs I feel like they are on top of me. I live off $600 a month and can't afford a car, so therefore my TV is the only entertainment that I have, and to think all my costs will have to be going up because of the government.

  • 50 Posted by saanusaanu on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a 42" Hitachi Plasma. Since l bought it, my kids suddenly developed a hatred for watching "their" channel on the smaller "tube" we had before and now, we don't even need to switch-on the heater in the living room! It does the warming for us but my electricity bill is now four times higher!! Not funny at all...

  • 51 Posted by bvvcs on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is interesting however I wonder is there the same concern with CRT and LCD Monitors for Computers?

  • 52 Posted by photot8ker1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    Here's just one more reason to KILL your TV!!!

  • 53 Posted by niotatngrant on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    Comparing apples to oranges doesn't constitute a fair comparison. Saying that Flat screens consume more energy because they have bigger screens or because people continue to use their old CRT is a smokescreen. If I am buying a new TV and am deciding between a CRT or flatscreen of a given size, this article tells me nothing. TVs in general are getting larger in size; using this fact alone to draw the conclusion that flatscreens consume more energy than CRTs is misleading. Compare apples to apples, head to head, and tell me the truth.

  • 54 Posted by axewielderx1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Unless a tv has some type of light that remains on when the tv is shut off,it does not consume energy. Just because something is plugged in,that does not mean it is using electricity.When a electronic device is turned off,a switch is flipped inside that closes the circuit and does not allow any electricity inside. Electricity cannot flow into a closed circuit.

  • 55 Posted by eye8brooks on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    Most people I know buy flat screens as a status statement and end up replacing thier old 42" CRT with a 13" flatscreen! (more energy my eye!)

  • 56 Posted by kingunguye1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have to agree with number 25, you all need to get a life. If you don't want to pay for the extra electricity the T.V.'s generate, don't buy them, it's just like anything else you buy, there are always added little perks that go with them, either more money to make them run, or more of our precious time that is required to get them to run suffiently. It all comes down to what you want, and what you are willing to do to use that item.

  • 57 Posted by mand35us on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    As long I have money to pay the energy for my 50' plasma,then I'm good....

  • 58 Posted by kecasey on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    How you use your TV, when you bought it, and how TV power consumption is measured today have no place in answering whether one tv consumes more energy than another. Those questions can only aid in efforts to not answer the original question honestly.

  • 59 Posted by mand35us on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    as long I have money to pay the energy for my 50' plasma,then I'm good to watch.

  • 60 Posted by biggiev2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have also heard of a DLP tv.....where does that figure into the whole scenario?

  • 61 Posted by dborg40 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    You must be kidding me. GEEZ, Al Gore got all you people worked up didn't he ? HERE'S A CLUE... The world changes. It changed during the billion years we weren't here and it will continue to change when we are gone. GET OVER IT. Stop with all the "global warming fear". Thank gawd we will soon be hit by a huge meteor and it will end the insanity. The dinosaurs had it right, die with a blaze of glory...lol

  • 62 Posted by jkm65 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    From the moment I first saw the name of this article, my first thought was; "Here we go again. More environmentalist wacko, class envy dogma." This article is the first step to comparing flat-screens with SUVs. You probably won't be hearing much about how much CO2 emissions are SAVED by staying home and watching TV versus driving to go out to the movies. While this article is well written and has some good info in it. It won't be long before we start hearing how evil and selfish we are for buying large flat screen TVs. What about the iPod? That will be next if it hasn't happened already. Keep a sharp lookout folks. The Green movement will soon want to tax your large flat screens and iPods to pay for the envirnmental damage you are causing.

  • 63 Posted by softcycle61 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a 19" crt and it works just fine. as far as banning cars and tvs we should just ban the cars and ride bicycles. Hvaing a larger and finer picture means nothing to me. Just like in Willie Wonka, watching too much tv gives you a sore neck and an IQ of three

  • 64 Posted by philipbarresi on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    This article's claim is not plausible. Plasma TVs are similar in concept/technology to a fluorescent light bulb. And accordingly, for two comparatively sized CRT and Plasma TVS, the Plasma would consume less electric. As Plasma TVs are generally larger than their CRT counterparts, the Plasma consumes about the same quantity of electric as the CRT. Inch for inch, the LCD consumes less electric than the plasma. The LCD also creates less heat, which has an additional effect of using less electric to provide cooling. This is why many major corporations have switched PC monitors from CRTs to LCDs, because when you have 300 of these on an office building floor, the savings add up. Lastly, the CRT contains lead and mercury, and gives off radiation when turned on - Plasmas and LCDs do not give off radiation and newer models do not contain lead or mercury.

  • 65 Posted by hmeetis on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    I can't honestly believe this article. How about this read the power consumption that is mandated for electrical safety that is on the device. I replaced 2 of my CRT monitors with LCD monitors same size and the CRT ones would draw 300 watts the lcd ones 50-80. Electrically speaking it makes no sence to say a lcd or plasma will draw more power then a CRT CRT shoots a beam of electricity from the rear of the tube to the front screen to make a image a lcd simply puts a small charge to the display depending on the engeneering i think depends on how to changes color but still we are talking about something that used to step up line voltage from 110 to about 20kv to something that take line voltage and steps it down to 12v dc there is no comparison. If taken on the actual face value lcd / plasma is far more energy effeciant hands down. Now if you have 5 tv's and never get rid of any and leave them plugged in and turned on or have a wastefull lifestyle thats a different story. Don't blame a TV for a person's choices. Also The amount of current drawn by a tv in standby mode especially a lcd is about as much as your alarm clock maybe even a little less. A switch would be really nice to have on the tv's or even better a tv that still has enough buttons that if i loose the remote in the middle of the night i can still operate the silly thing!

More Posts: First Prev 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.