Tue Jan 2, 2007 6:47PM EST
See Comments (142)
Why is it that there's no such thing as an easy answer to a simple question when it comes to technology? Over the warm holiday weekend we had one of those "green" discussions, as I'm sure so many of you did. The questions posed were simple: Are the new LCD and plasma displays more energy efficient than old CRT screens? And, which is more energy efficient: plasma or LCD? (I'll cover this question in part II of my post.)
The answer depends on many things, including how you use your TV, when you bought it, and—most of all—how TV power consumption is measured today.
First, the question of new flat-screen TVs versus old cathode-ray TVs. Generally speaking, large-screen TVs consume more energy than the smaller-screened CRT-based TVs they replace. And most people are adding TVs. That is, they tend not to replace old TVs with new ones but add a second or third TV. And since TVs consume power even when they're not on, just adding a TV set or two can add dramatically to your power consumption.
A recent report by the BBC found that in the United Kingdom, plasma televisions, which it says are about 50 percent bigger than their cathode-ray-tube equivalents, "consume about four times more energy according to the government-funded Energy Saving Trust." And when looking at the carbon emissions from the power plants, the same group found that old-style TVs produce 100kg of climate-warming C02 per year, while larger, plasma screens will pump out 400kg from the plant. A recent report from Panasonic, makers of both LCD and plasma TVs, said that the new TVs consume more power than older CRTs, but the company is working to get the new TVs to be more energy efficient as fast as it possibly can.
Some of the best research can be found at EfficientProducts.org. The site says that a typical U.S. household watches about five hours of television each day and that there are about 260 million TVs in our homes. They claim that our TVs are responsible for about 1 percent of our nation's electricity production a year (47 billion kilowatt hours). Most of this electricity is consumed when the TV is turned on (90 percent), but the remaining 10 percent is used in standby modes when the set has been turned off. It predicts that unless TV efficiency improves, the rapid growth in TV sales, increased hours of TV viewing, and multiple TVs per household will ultimately contribute to a rise in TV energy consumption by about 50 percent before 2010.
OK, so much for new TVs replacing cathode tubes. It seems the new TVs consume more power. Now what about the different types of flat screens? Do you know which consumes more power? LCD or plasma? Keep reading to find out.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
It is amazing how things that consume energy, that we talk about,yet no one is planning to reverse the trend of new products, and to inprove their efficency.I think there should be laws as to how many tv's are allowed in each household.;;Louis Belovich
Hmmm, interesting. My new LCD is actually throwing off heat! A sure sign that they consume more electricity.
I'm just a simple kind'a guy. My old 27" Sony CRT's nameplated at 165 Watts Max (that's less than 1.5 amps). My 50" LG plasma is nameplated at 5 amps. Of course the LG, at 1050 sq.inches, is about 3 times the Sony's 350 sq.inches, so, inch to inch, the plasma is marginally less effecient than the crt. simple ?? Overall, tho, it's a pig, but my furnace runs less often !!
oh, and axewielderx1 , consider this: My TV is off. I point my remote control at in, click power, and it comes on. Conclusion, there is something in there that is on all the time (as further evidenced by that little red light that's on. Dito everything elso on my rack that has a remote control. Sure, not much for any of them. I don't however advocate routinely unplugging them, tho - I'd hate to reset the clocks and programming and channel finding every day.
Nice post, Nathan (post #44). But, to be honest, I enjoy the anti-eco and anti-lib whacko posts, they make me feel so much more comfortable about being a smart... and dare I say 'elitist'... liberal. Keep posting, you super patriot hummer driving fox news watching global warming denying country music listening right-wingers... you guys are like poster children for idiocy.
The author never mentioned whether TV's of the same size were more efficient or not. The author just mentioned that they normally get replaced by bigger TV's that use more energy. I would like to know does a 25" LCD TV use less energy than a 25" CRT TV.
DLP's cost an average of $60 a year to run. Plasmas run about $300 a yr to run.
As one who is slightly green, TV isn't the real culprit for power consumption/waste. If the US car manufacturers were as good as they claimed, why are we still buying vehicles that use ever more gas instead of less? If 1% of my electric bill is used to power my 3 TV's, why should I worry? The extra fuel my small truck guzzles bothers me more than the electric bill
My 50" plasma seems to put out less heat than my 32" Phillips HD CRT. Neither holds a candle to 7:1 Surround Sound reciever with amplifed bass speakers. With the HD picture, I spend Sunday's watching football games instead of taking out the 5.7 litre SUV for a ride tailgating those little clown hybrid cars that cannot get out of their way. I am down to less than 10 gallons of gas a week. Sort of like my wife saying she saved me money by going to a big sale and buying a lot of stuff. As for the ludlite treehuggers, why don't you folks stop bothering us and go to your utopia where nobody uses electricity, there is no mall sprawl, enterainment is kicking a ball around, and the food has no preservatives and little fat. It is called rural Pakistan/India. Heck, maybe you can find your old job they offshored..
Yeah I notice they lump together LCD and plasma together and don't really talk about LCD...
Why can these posts NEVER stay on topic. Half the posts here are just ppl flaming other ppl on their opinion. What a waste of time this was.
26'' is not huge i have a 42'' and i still want a 60'' lol
So what! HDTV has brought alot of enrichment to my life. I would rather life a richer, fuller life, than a long boring one.
OK....I replaced a 36" RCA CRT with a 42" Sony LCD and my power bill went down. You figure!
26" is for my bathroom, where the heck is that guy from!? He must be a leprechaun if he thinks 26" is huge!
We do not have TV since last 14 months. 1St week was very bad. My daughter and her friend do home work without watching TV. Whatever the world new news we want to see, we see it on computer online and faster than TV and uncut. We read book in spare time. We are not sport freak. We get enough sleep now. Newspapers are good alternative. C. B. Gandhi
This is great!, we all talk of how great this new technoligy and the space it takes up, but I only see where the giant corporations get together with the power companies to figure out how to make more money from hiding the truth from the people. Don't get me wrong, I love this new stuff, it's smaller,lighter,and sometimes hidden away. Energy-efficent is being regulated by the big corporations that want more of that big pie in the sky, ask them if they want less money,the answear,I don't think so!
I love my LCD 1080 46" HDTV. To save energy, I promise not to cook.
Look at the wattage ratings and you'll see LCD's of comparable size use way less power than a Plasma. Remember, P(watts)= I * V. One thing that I found out was a wives tale is that plasma's don't last as long. When I compared life in hour between the two types, I found them to be about the same. Personally I would go LCD. Less power consumption and less heat generated.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66 Posted by wolf776gang on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse
Wait a second, do you mean to tell me that the 4 giga zillion dollars of advertising for these new LCD & PLASMA TVs this past Christmas didn't warn me that I was going to add to the global warming problem? I am gonna sue !