Thu Feb 8, 2007 3:43AM EST
See Comments (16)
Some truly nutty, Footloose-worthy legislation attempts are under foot: According to BetaNews, New York State Senator Carl Kruger is trying to push through a law that would subject pedestrians to a $100 fine for crossing the street with their iPods on. Apparently three pedestrians have been killed in the last year in N.Y. State Senator Carl Kruger's home district.
Okay, I'll admit that I have almost been hit by a car at least a couple of times while crossing the street with my iPod at full blast (not to mention my portable CD player and cassette-tape Walkman before that). But those close encounters with car contact taught me a lesson: Look both ways before you cross the street, just like Mom said. Or put warnings on the iPod boxes (I think some audio player and headphone models already have this).
Making it against the law to wear your Walkman seems like a waste of taxpayer money, not to mention a buzz-kill right out of Footloose (the movie is set in a town where dancing was against the law). I mean, how would you even check if someone had their music on or off? What a hassle it'll be if complying with the law means taking your headphones off every single time you cross the street.
This may not be an issue for most Americans, who usually drive everywhere, but for anyone in a small town or walkable big city, this could be a bummer. I mean, why should I have to shut off my iPod when it's perfectly legal for packs of smokers to exhale cancer-causing fumes in my face every time I walk by a bar? Work on that annoying byproduct of the anti-smoking movement before you take my iPod away.
What do you think: Should iPods be banned at crosswalks?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
An old friend once told me that if you pass laws to protect fools from themselves, you end up with a world full of fools. He was refering to helmet laws for motorcyclists, but it would apply to this law as well.
Apparently for lack for better work to do, the congressmen from New York are creating legislation that does not serve any cause. How stupid can they get ?
I think Darwin has the right idea here. "Natural Selection" serves to promote the survival of the fittest. If you're not smart enough to check for the on coming city bus or the run-away garbage truck before you step off the curb... society is probably better off without you.
Three people? thats insane! How many people must die before the world learns. Maybe we should make driving illegal so to protect all of the other people that die in crosswalk tragedies. We can make a comittee to investigate and discuss possiable ways of educating our children about the dangers of iPods. We will need to teach them how to cross streets. I think it can be done if we all work together.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by shutrbug@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:21PM EDT Report Abuse
I agree that this would be one of the stupidest laws ever. At some point people have to use common sense. You can legislate intelligence.