Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:04PM EST
See Comments (180)
If you spent any time on the East Coast during the '80s you'll remember an electronics store called Crazy Eddie's. Radio and TV ads had the owner, Crazy Eddie, screaming about the store's savings. When talking about flat-screen TV prices this holiday season, I feel a little like Crazy Eddie. "These prices are INSANE!!"
Just a few years ago, 50-inch HDTV plasma TVs retailed for upward of $7,000. Early in 2006, we saw the first sub-$2,000 50-inch HDTV model from a company called Vizio. The company has since dropped its price to $1,699, but that's not the MOST INSANE deal offered. Costco is offering a 50-inch HDTV plasma monitor from a company called Maxent. With an automatic Costco discount, this set retails for $1,499. It's the first sub-$1,500 50-inch HDTV model on the market. "THAT'S INSANE!!"
As a savvy consumer you're asking yourself a few questions right now, foremost of which is, "Vizio? Maxent? Who are these guys?" These are new companies that have gone after a very niche market: the budget consumer. Unlike Panasonic, Sony, and Phillips, Vizio and Maxent aren't manufacturing TVs for the entire range of HDTV consumers. They have limited distribution through big-box discount stores, and their business model makes sense: don't try to please every consumer or try to be in every retail outlet. They've picked their market and are keeping costs down by pursuing the budget buyer exclusively.
Next question: "Are these HDTV plasmas any good?" For the price, these TVs are very good, but compared to high-end plasma sets, you can definitely see a quality difference. Several PC magazines have written about these sets (Vizio and Maxent), and they received surprisingly good reviews. It's good to see what you'll miss out on if you opt for a lower-cost set, but those features and differences probably won't matter if cost is your number one consideration. (And for most of us, isn't it always number one?) As for my personal opinion, I did a segment for Good Morning America showing sets from across the price spectrum. As I scanned the studio to inspect the sets, I noticed that the Vizio I included was a little less crisp, the colors a little less vibrant, and the video inputs a little less plentiful or diverse than the higher-priced plasmas'.
One thing you might consider with a budget set is purchasing an extended warranty. I generally don't advise extended warranties, but if it makes you feel more comfortable and doesn't cost as much to get the warranty as it would to buy a brand name, trust your gut. Buying a budget HDTV means you have to do your homework, but remember that THESE PRICES ARE INSANE!!
Check out more insanely priced TVs in Yahoo! Tech's Television Resource Center.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
What is the difference between the 1080I and the 1080P?
It is easy to put down a company going for a certain market, but maybe the person who is spending $5,000 to $10,000 for a plasma is the only one who notices or cares about that little difference in color, input. I am on a tight budget and my analog died and had no choice but to get a plasma because that is all that is available now. That is INSANE,that we have no choice other than how much we will be raped financially!!
I own RTS Satellite here in my local city and install and hookup satellite tv everyday. I have a 61' RCA (yes, RCA) DLP that I got for 2,100.00 with stand included. It has more inputs and outputs than I will ever use...LOL I am on DishNet right now because 1. They are the only satellite provider in my local area that offers local channels and 2. Between Dish and Direct, Dish offers 3 times as many HD channels. First and formost, there is a huge difference with your main input...i.e. local cable, satellite, off-air antenna, etc..... So far, satellite is the only true digital signal available. Next is the screen resolution. I wouldnt run anything less than 1080i or 1080p. Then you have your connection. Here is a little list for you going from worst to best. Co-ax cable. A/V cables. S-Video - which will need A/V's for audio because S-video only carries video signals. Component cables - which will need A/V's for audio because they only carry video signals. HDMI I personally try to run anything I can with HDMI. Then Component cables.... Just my .02 cents
Monitors come with no channel changing and no speakers. You must have a sound system and cable box
60" Plasma is well in the range of $10k for a good brand
First,low price don't mean low quality.We can regard them as a strategic,like article said,new not TV-Manufacturing makes those TVs,but they may grow from such a new plasma tech.,every compny needs time for growing! Second,takes we panel plants much strees.Plasma panel were dropped much due to Plasma TV. We can't afford more!because the market is not wide,but the price is decreasing day by day.
I DON'T THINK I COULD AFFORD IT EVEN AT THAT PRICE. IF I HAD $1,500 TO SPLURGE I PROBABLY BUY SOMETHING ELSE OR JUST SAVE IT. MOST AVERAGE HARDWORKING OR NON WORKING PEOPLE CAN'T AFFORD IT
I just got a 21" LCD HD Toshiba for $2,872.99!
We purchased a 42" Maxent plasma monitor last December at Costco for $1699. We have enjoyed it very much and are pleased with the picture. we added a Phillips home theater and are completely happy. Recommend Maxent very highly!
BIG TIME WARNER CABLE TIP - I too got the 52" Walmart tv for 474 on black Friday. Stood in line for 7 hours to make sure I got one. The picture looks great for the money, so why spend more? Even the reguler price is only 899.99. Sure the more expensive ones probably look even better, but my bargin HD TV looks ten times better on HD channles then the the analog channles so IMOP, a cheap HD is just as good if you can't spend alot. Bottom line, don't feel you need to spend big bucks on a HD TV. Plus, Walmart has super cheap full converage warenties so I'm covered now for over two years. Now the Time Warner tip. Time Warner offers up HD services for 7.99 extra a month where I live. There DVR is 12.99 a month. Together that's 21 a month if you have an HD TV and want both. The DVR though has HD built in it. There for I traded in my old box for the DVR box, declined there offer for HD, bought my own DMI cable for 40 bucks, as opposed to there 30 doller one, and now get my HD for "free". Or you could say that I'm getting a DVR for 5 dollers a month if you like that math better. Either way, if you get an HD TV, just get the DVR and don't tell Time Warner that you want HD service or they will charge you another 8 bucks a month for nothing, which is almost a hundred extra a year. PS. I don't consider this theft as the only thing I'm doing is declining to pay 8 extra dollers month. I'm not modifing anthing, the abbility to watch HD is in the box there renting me, and if they don't like it, they should have two seperate DVR boxes. I also still would have had to pay them for my DMI cable if I had asked for the service as opposed to just going to the store and buying one. There selection of HD channels is also very low compared to satalite. And finally, your actually paying for the HD channels anyway. Under their agreements with the stations, the HD channles are sold to them per subsriber regardless if you can watch them or not. In reality every Time Warner customer pays for the channles, just not all can watch them. The 7.99 is really just to rent the box that costs them more to make, and like I said, I'm paying them 13 extra a month now for one so why should I give them another 8 bucks to boot when there not doing anything extra? See my point. Just my very long tip. Home it helps some out on saving money.
I Borrowed my brother's-neighbors 112in hd projector for a Superbowl party.We also purchased 2 kegs and a folding table full of snacks and dip. In the 4th quarter, someone puked on the bedsheet we were projecting the game onto on their way to the john. The picture quality seemed to suffer. Would switching from the composite video imput to the dvi imput improve the picture quality? I love this forum.
$479 for a 32" Westinghouse LCD HDTV from Best Buy on Black Friday. The kicker is, I was in South Korea when I bought it. Gotta love having friends that hook you up. I got another LCD too. A 15.4' HP pentium solo core 1.86 Mz notebook pc for $349. Less than $900 for both--THAT'S INSANE!!!
nice HDTV!
BIG TIME WARNER CABLE TIP - I too got the 52" Walmart tv for 474 on black Friday. Stood in line for 7 hours to make sure I got one. The picture looks great for the money, so why spend more? Even the reguler price is only 899.99. Sure the more expensive ones probably look even better, but my bargin HD TV looks ten times better on HD channles then the the analog channles so IMOP, a cheap HD is just as good if you can't spend alot. Bottom line, don't feel you need to spend big bucks on a HD TV. Plus, Walmart has super cheap full converage warenties so I'm covered now for over two years. Now the Time Warner tip. Time Warner offers up HD services for 7.99 extra a month where I live. There DVR is 12.99 a month. Together that's 21 a month if you have an HD TV and want both. The DVR though has HD built in it. There for I traded in my old box for the DVR box, declined there offer for HD, bought my own DMI cable for 40 bucks, as opposed to there 30 doller one, and now get my HD for "free". Or you could say that I'm getting a DVR for 5 dollers a month if you like that math better. Either way, if you get an HD TV, just get the DVR and don't tell Time Warner that you want HD service or they will charge you another 8 bucks a month for nothing, which is almost a hundred extra a year. PS. I don't consider this theft as the only thing I'm doing is declining to pay 8 extra dollers month. I'm not modifing anthing, the abbility to watch HD is in the box there renting me, and if they don't like it, they should have two seperate DVR boxes. I also still would have had to pay them for my DMI cable if I had asked for the service as opposed to just going to the store and buying one. There selection of HD channels is also very low compared to satalite. And finally, your actually paying for the HD channels anyway. Under their agreements with the stations, the HD channles are sold to them per subsriber regardless if you can watch them or not. In reality every Time Warner customer pays for the channles, just not all can watch them. The 7.99 is really just to rent the box that costs them more to make, and like I said, I'm paying them 13 extra a month now for one so why should I give them another 8 bucks to boot when there not doing anything extra? See my point. Just my very long tip. Home it helps some out on saving money. BIG TIME WARNER CABLE TIP - I too got the 52" Walmart tv for 474 on black Friday. Stood in line for 7 hours to make sure I got one. The picture looks great for the money, so why spend more? Even the reguler price is only 899.99. Sure the more expensive ones probably look even better, but my bargin HD TV looks ten times better on HD channles then the the analog channles so IMOP, a cheap HD is just as good if you can't spend alot. Bottom line, don't feel you need to spend big bucks on a HD TV. Plus, Walmart has super cheap full converage warenties so I'm covered now for over two years. Now the Time Warner tip. Time Warner offers up HD services for 7.99 extr
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
166 Posted by therealmikebrown on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:04PM EDT Report Abuse
HDTV's would be cheaper if the tv companies kept making crt's. THey are bigger but have better picture, better black ratio, brighter picture. TV companies make more money off of LCD's and plasmas, why make a cheap crt when you can doulbe your profits selling the flat panels. The TV companies decided you want a lighter tv, than a big TV with a better longer lasting picture.