Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:04PM EST
See Comments (180)
If you spent any time on the East Coast during the '80s you'll remember an electronics store called Crazy Eddie's. Radio and TV ads had the owner, Crazy Eddie, screaming about the store's savings. When talking about flat-screen TV prices this holiday season, I feel a little like Crazy Eddie. "These prices are INSANE!!"
Just a few years ago, 50-inch HDTV plasma TVs retailed for upward of $7,000. Early in 2006, we saw the first sub-$2,000 50-inch HDTV model from a company called Vizio. The company has since dropped its price to $1,699, but that's not the MOST INSANE deal offered. Costco is offering a 50-inch HDTV plasma monitor from a company called Maxent. With an automatic Costco discount, this set retails for $1,499. It's the first sub-$1,500 50-inch HDTV model on the market. "THAT'S INSANE!!"
As a savvy consumer you're asking yourself a few questions right now, foremost of which is, "Vizio? Maxent? Who are these guys?" These are new companies that have gone after a very niche market: the budget consumer. Unlike Panasonic, Sony, and Phillips, Vizio and Maxent aren't manufacturing TVs for the entire range of HDTV consumers. They have limited distribution through big-box discount stores, and their business model makes sense: don't try to please every consumer or try to be in every retail outlet. They've picked their market and are keeping costs down by pursuing the budget buyer exclusively.
Next question: "Are these HDTV plasmas any good?" For the price, these TVs are very good, but compared to high-end plasma sets, you can definitely see a quality difference. Several PC magazines have written about these sets (Vizio and Maxent), and they received surprisingly good reviews. It's good to see what you'll miss out on if you opt for a lower-cost set, but those features and differences probably won't matter if cost is your number one consideration. (And for most of us, isn't it always number one?) As for my personal opinion, I did a segment for Good Morning America showing sets from across the price spectrum. As I scanned the studio to inspect the sets, I noticed that the Vizio I included was a little less crisp, the colors a little less vibrant, and the video inputs a little less plentiful or diverse than the higher-priced plasmas'.
One thing you might consider with a budget set is purchasing an extended warranty. I generally don't advise extended warranties, but if it makes you feel more comfortable and doesn't cost as much to get the warranty as it would to buy a brand name, trust your gut. Buying a budget HDTV means you have to do your homework, but remember that THESE PRICES ARE INSANE!!
Check out more insanely priced TVs in Yahoo! Tech's Television Resource Center.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
1.) the article was about Plasma...not LCDs, DLPs or any of the rear projection. 2.) The price for plasmas at one time was on average $7000 for a midsize tv (42"). We sold our 60" plasma (one per store MAX quantity) for $17,000 tag price. the article was stating that they're finally starting to be more affordable. 3.) BMW and Lexus make cars that park themselves. Honda doesn't. If you cant afford the BMW, you buy the honda. Same goes for plasma tvs. They still make good DLPs for much less. 4.) It all depends on cost of living in the area. I'm 20 and bought the Pioneer 60" plasma tv ($6400). I also live on the west coast, and my 3200 sq ft house cost me $239,000. So just STFU
This article is proposterous! Very poor content. How dissapointed are the readers on the part of Yahoo to waste bandwidth on this?? Very!!! =(
Get a normal TV. Don't listen to the kids. Don't try to keep up with the Jones. If you want huge projection, get an overhead projector and splash the content of the TV on a white wall. You will be happy.
I agree that these really arent bargains. to say you are getting a great dealbecause theve come down in price is kinda silly because I see them in the bar and they are not that clear they are fuzzy and even if they surronded me and vibrated my scrotum I still think it isnt worth 1500. These tv's are especially not for families cause 1500 bucks can go a long way even if you have all the basic needs. I know if I had kids and all my bills were upto date and we were doing good I might want to invest in a collage saveings plan rather than flush 1500 buck on an bad box that is way over priced and i will have to scan for man hours a day to find a show worth watching.
could someone clarify a few things for me? 1. what are the pro/con's of LCDs vs. Plasma. 2. what is the deal with "monitors" and why would a best buy kid keep instilling that in his sales pitch to me? 3. do plasma's really burn out as quick as everyone claims?
Boy does that person live in a different wold than mine, if they think 1500-2000 dollars is really cheap. Most anything over 100 dollars is a lot of money to most every body I know. Ken
I like Samsung the best. They have every type of TV you need. LCD, Plasma, DLP and their CRT models. I just bought a 46" 1080p LCD from Samsung and it is awesome. I gave my 61" Samsung DLP to my parents and they are blown away.... granted they went from analog cable with a 27 inch TV to HD digital cable & DVR with a 61" DLP but still... We are all happy with our Samsung TVs.
Our 9 year old TV broke this past spring, had a flat line, but kept it going by jamming cardboard against the composite connectors. Kept that up until the black friday deals when I purchased a 32 inch HDTV for $369 after $150 rebate. The picture quality is noticably better, but I don't see the value in paying regular price of $800.
I will go out buy one, even the rent is due.
I just bought a Sansung lcd flat panel and it's amazing. I did alot of homework on the sets and found that the top three were in order Samsumg, LG,Sony. I went withthe Samsung because it has 2 HDMI inputs (so does the LG) but also because it had the highest contrast ratio for shaper better picture at 4000.1 compared to sony and LG at 1600.1, in addition the retail price was 1,400 dollars but with some shopping I ended up getting it at 1,000 and 65.00 shipping and it's bene perfect. Also it has the highest rating for customer satisfaction. It's fine to say prices are dropping but a sub par system is still sub par. Go with Samsung or LG. I been watching Becky Worley for many years now from her Tech TV days and she's great(and to me also hot)but on this shes picking the wrong products.
I think the line the author uses that states their financial mindset while writing this article is "It's good to see what you'll miss out on if you opt for a lower-cost set, but those features and differences probably won't matter if cost is your number one consideration. (And for most of us, isn't it always number one?)" Um, yea, sure we live in the US where affordable is a relative term to how much credit card debt we are willing to take on. And of course, who wants to get ripped off? Cost is generally the number one consideration to about 98% of the population. But low cost and low quality seem to be what the author is trying to say about this "Low" cost 50" TV. Suggesting to go against the grain and actually advocate getting an extended warranty seems to send up red flags about the legitimacy of the author. My guess..they are a sales person writing on the side, while trying to get a little kickback from these bigbox stores that sell these new name HDTV's.
reply to post 9...post 7 stated $300 NOT $3000
If cost is more of a concern than overall size I would suggest looking at DLP sets. I have a 46" Toshiba that I got last year for 1500.oo (they can be had for less now - around 1200.00)- it does 780P and 1080i - and looks great. You can't hang it on a wall but it only weighs about 70 pounds so is much lighter than tube TVs and is not as deep. They also are making 1080P DLP sets but I did not think the improvement, though noticeable side by side, was worth the extra dollars. Also the salespeople said it was better for video games than LCD or Plasma and did not have screen burn-in problems like those sometimes do.
I will go out a brand new SAMSUNG even though my rent is due.
As a owner of a 50" sony hdtv and a polariod 37"hdtv i personally ca tell the difference between my kid emerson 20"lcds, I believe that if you are going to upgrade to a hdtv plasmas are overated dlp and lcd are by far more affrordable best buy sony 50"hdlcd 1599???
Terrysmash has definately given the most intersting remark to this article. LOL. By the way, I don't think you can even rent a trailer in East Rednickville for $1500/mth.
I don't know what happened with the guy from Atlanta but I have a 61" Toshiba TV and have had it for 7 years with not a bit of trouble. My son in law has a 56" Toshiba and he also could not be happier.
I bought the Samsung 56" 1080p DLP rear-projection HDTV on sale for about $1979.99, with tax it came to $2123.46. I got it a Circuit City, they had the lowest prices in my research, unless you want to buy from a shady internet dealer. That is more than most would pay, but for a top of the line TV it is a good price. Some are saying $300.00 is too much. I think it depends how much time you spend in front of the TV. I recently bought a house and am strapped for cash every month. This fact makes my TV one of only a few entertainment options. Because of this I want an awsome TV. I like to watch movies and once you see sports in HD you won't ever want to watch sports any other way. If you can come up with the cash you should definately make the switch to HDTV. You don't have to spend as much as I did. You can get a quality 50" 1080i HDTV for under $1,500.00. In the end if you watch a lot of movies, sports or regular TV it is well worth it. On another note, I went with rear-projection because plasmas get burnout (my inlaws have one and I can't stand it), and LCD just doesn't do it for me. Also, rear projection is almost identical in picture quality (all HDTVs are great if you look at them by themselves and not next to others) and will go for about $1,000.00 less than LCD and $500.00 less than plasma.
you guys shouldn't totally rely on the workers. exactly what the other post said, they are temporary. if your looking for a television at a cost of $1500 or more, you most likely have a computer to do your own research to refer to. even if these tv's contain a hd tuner or not, you get what you pay for.imo, these are still great deals.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Posted by cha1355 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:21PM EDT Report Abuse
Before deciding on a big screen, I did my homework: get 1080, nothing lower-1080 accepts all lower feeds. Watch out for "off" brands such as Vizio-if they cater to the lower incomes, the quality will be relative. I bought a 52 inch Plasma from Sears for a fraction of what my partner paid for his last year. Plasmas do not "burn out" in 3 years. One thing to truly be careful of: do not pause screen with a plasma as an image will permanently imbed itself in the screen; ie-gaming. Don't bother with LG brands. As with their phones, they are crap.