Hot digicams for the holidays
Fri Dec 5, 2008 1:04PM EST
See Comments (84)
Digital cameras always make great gifts for family members and friends during the holiday season. If you need a starting point to help you get shopping, here's my list of favorite digicams, broken down in order of lowest-to-highest cost—there's a little bit in here for everyone.
Point and shoot:
Kodak EasyShare C913 - $99: Kodak's slim and easy-to-use point-and-shot camera is a solid choice for 'tweens and teens. It captures photos at 9.2-megapixels, has a 3x optical zoom lens, 16 MB of internal memory, an SD/MMC card slot, and a 2.4-inch LCD screen. Also, the C913 can capture photos at a 16:9 ratio for display on widescreen photo frames and HDTV sets (with an additional dock), and it can also record video at VGA resolution (640x480 at 15 fps). If you're looking to save a few bucks, Kodak also has the Easyshare C713 for $79, which is a similar camera in terms of features but only captures images at 7.0-megapixels.
Casio Exilim EX-Z150 - $152: The Exilim series has always been known for three things: slim body, big optical zoom lens, and big LCDs, and you get all three of these things at a really nice price point. The EX-Z150, available in five different colors, features an 8.1-megapixel sensor, 4x optical zoom, a big 3-inch LCD screen, an SDHC/MMC slot, a 28mm wide-angle lens for those tight, indoor shots, and an image-stabilization feature. The EX-Z150 also records video at 640x480 resolution at 30 fps, so catching those YouTube-worthy moments won't be a problem. One minor note: The EX-Z150 uses a proprietary USB cable—might be an annoyance for some. Still, a very sexy camera for a great price.
Canon Powershot SD1100 IS - $149-$199: Canon's SD series has always had impressive entries, and the SD1100 IS is yet another solid candidate. Also available in five colors, the SD1100 IS features an 8.0-megapixel sensor, 3x optical zoom, image stabilization, 2.5-inch LCD, an SDHC/MMC slot, and a movie mode with 640x480 video recording at 30 fps. Now, on paper, the Casio does have the Canon beat, but in my opinion (and others might think differently), I feel that Canon models produce finer images when looking under a microscope. If you aren't sure, go to a big box retailer and try them out before you buy. Got some extra cash? The new 890 IS is a meaty step up at $299, but you get a 3-inch screen, DiG!C 4 image processing, and a 28mm wide lens for those tight shots.
Digital SLRs:
Nikon D40 - Around $400: Nikon's D40 has been around since 2006, but it's still is a great, compact, entry-level SLR. It features a 6-megapixel sensor, a 2.5-inch LCD, SDHC/MMC support, 2.5 fps continuous shooting. The D40 has great image quality, it's lightweight and compact, and it comes in at a very attractive price for those wanting to dabble in digital SLRs. One thing you should know however: There's no motor in the lens, making the selection of compatible lenses considerably less. However, this camera's strong performance and low, low price makes this a perfect starting point for those that want to get serious about photography.
Canon Rebel XS - Around $500: This digital SLR is also a great starting point for entry level consumers. It features a 10-megapixel sensor, a 2.5-inch LCD, 3.0 fps continuous shooting, SDHC card support, and DiG!C III processing. Additionally, it is compatible with more lenses than when compared with the D40. If you've got some extra cash, the Canon Rebel XSi adds a higher megapixel sensor—12.2-megapixels to be exact, 3.5 fps continuous shooting, a 3-inch LCD, and several other niceties. You can find the XSi complete with lens for around $650-$799, which is also a great value.
Canon EOS 5D Mark II - $2600: Yes, the high price tag is straight up hard to look at, but the EOS 5D Mark II stands out right now as my favorite digital SLR on the market. It features a 21.1-megapixel sensor, DiG!C4 processing, 3.9 fps continuous shooting, a 3-inch LCD, and the ability to record full video in full 1080p resolution. If you've got a minute, check out the sample video created by Canon with the Mark II and a few lenses (no computer effects at all).
Of course, these are just some of my picks, but if you have the opportunity, you should definitely try to make some time and hit a big box store to try the camera out first. What are your personal favorites?
Top 5 Posts
More About Holiday
Comments on Hot digicams for the holidays
Post a Comment
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
-
27 Posted by jfk_pdk on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:34PM EDT Report Abuse
I just purchased a Sony A300. It was the most user friendly of all the cameras that I looked at, not to mention that you can use the LCD screen to take pictures, which Cannon and Nikon do not offer. I think all of the DSLR makers offer great cameras, and many people end up buying the one they are most familiar with or find the best deal on. I would definately recommend to anyone looking at DSLR's that they check out the Sony Alpha's before making a final decision.
-
28 Posted by lurchlarson on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:00PM EDT Report Abuse
I agree with calvinwolfe2003 and f_shokooh You are forgetting pentax in the consumer level slr market. They scored better than canon and nikon in detail retention at high ISO. Not to mention their weather sealed bodies; something that you flat out don't find for under $1000 from anyone else. You can pick up the Pentax k20 for under $900. You can pick up a k200 for under $600. That too is weather-sealed. It doesn't even look like you checked out other review sites who have way more experience than you do. For anyone looking to buy a camera this christmas don't listen to this guy. He has been bought by major manufacturers. Go to DPREVIEW.COM . That site is one of the the top (if not the top) camera review site in the WORLD. You will get a much more thorough review there.
-
29 Posted by travy_g on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:19PM EDT Report Abuse
sony cybershot , hands down the best digi cam. the HD pics are crystal clear, and the video it takes it amazing, sound quality and all......when it comes to digi cams, you can nevr go wrong with Sony or Nikon...ever.....hp cams are great , but dont last long and have way too many mechanical parts screaming as you try 2 focus
-
30 Posted by bayzap on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:03PM EDT Report Abuse
Take a look at the new Canon G10. The power and features of an SLR and you can put it in your pocket. It also has a wide angle lens that is very important for family photos and indoor shots. The most expensive SLR camera is of no value if you do not carry it because it is heavy and bulky. Great photos are in the moment. I have both and use the G10 95% of the time. I consider myself an to be an advanced amateur and have had photos published. The magic is not in the paint or brush, but how the artist uses them.
-
31 Posted by pilotmatt94 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:12PM EDT Report Abuse
Let's not forget the Canon Digital Rebel XTi. It's right between the Rebel Xs and the Rebel XSi in price, it has the same image processors and the XSi and the XS, it has a 10 MP sensor, and it's not short on features by a long shot.
-
32 Posted by peetie6009 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:05PM EDT Report Abuse
I hope that Kodak has improved their reliability.I recently had mine fail after only using it very minimumly.I received it just over a year ago as a gift and it started to take extremely blurry pics then would work occasionally,and finally quit altogether.
-
33 Posted by ladyambassador on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:55PM EDT Report Abuse
I agree with the Kodak being A great camera. Have had nithing but great service at a reasonable price.
-
34 Posted by queenoftherokk on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:24PM EDT Report Abuse
I have a sneaking suspicion that this article was funded by the companies that make these cameras. Otherwise, the person who wrote it really doesn't know their ----- . Cannon power shot is a really good camera though, not so sure about the rest....
-
35 Posted by queenoftherokk on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:24PM EDT Report Abuse
I have a sneaking suspicion that this article was funded by the companies that make these cameras. Otherwise, the person who wrote it really doesn't know their ----- . Cannon power shot is a really good camera though, not so sure about the rest....
-
36 Posted by d_wags1215 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:50PM EDT Report Abuse
I agree with the comments about the poor quality of Kodak cameras. Sure, they are cheap, but it shows in the picture quality and battery life. I had mine for a year and replaced it with a Sony. Highly recommend Sony, and am surprised they aren't on the list. I wonder which companies "sponsored" this article? Hmmm....
-
37 Posted by gunia420 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:14PM EDT Report Abuse
to michaelpatrickbrady: I've got a Kodak Easyshare camera. Had it for almost a year and it takes darn good pictures. Anyways, I am eying an SLR myself.
-
38 Posted by gunia420 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:14PM EDT Report Abuse
And to those criticizing the blog entry, he clearly states at the end that these are his picks and clearly ask for users personal choices. It would be really nice if people took the time to read an entire piece before jumping in to comment
-
39 Posted by kel_highlyfavored7 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:49PM EDT Report Abuse
so, i think they recommended kodak cameras for kids and teens because, we are most likely 2 break them...just my thought on it...
-
40 Posted by jca_egan on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:30PM EDT Report Abuse
If your going to write a piece, people are going to criticize it, quit whining about it, hes not... and Kodaks are still cheap...
-
41 Posted by gunia420 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:14PM EDT Report Abuse
First off jca_egan, no one is whining. I merely pointed out this is not an article, its a blog. I also didn't imply that no one has a right to criticize anything. I simply stated that readers should actually read the piece before commenting, a trend that seems to be all to prevalent in these little comment sections. And maybe Kodak cameras are cheap. I am not to familiar with any info, reviews on their value. Personally, my last two camera's have been Kodak cameras. One I purchased almost 4 years ago and it still works fine and my current one I have. So my personal experience with Kodak has been nothing but good
-
42 Posted by jca_egan on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:30PM EDT Report Abuse
I read it and I felt the need to comment because until Kodak delivers a better product, the cameras shouldn't be recommended to consumers, congratulations that you struck gold and had good luck with Kodaks. You must take great care of your equipment and anyone who properly takes care of their stuff should have good luck. I'm a little rough on some of my stuff as I use my cameras backpacking, and in rough weather conditions so I need a product that is a little more durable. The whining comment was probably unnecessary but this blog is poorly supported, and will give consumers insufficient information on purchasing a digital camera.
-
43 Posted by vannroberts2004 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:31PM EDT Report Abuse
I have a Nikon FTN. It is a film camera. I got it in Japen in 1970 - it has been a wonderful thing and I have used it a long time. It has some good lens - particularly an 85 mm. Can I use those old ( but good ) Nikkor lens with any of the new digital cameras ?? Thanks and Merry Christmas Vann Roberts Dalton Georgia USA
-
44 Posted by pschef1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:20PM EDT Report Abuse
How many of you knew that cameras are for taking pictures of those things you don't see or have. Therefore it is the new pictures which are important.Taking pictures you have taken before is a waste of time. This concept saves paper, chemicals, colorants and time. Furthermore it is exciting to see a new picture. If you are really hung up on old pictures then look at the old picture! Have not, waste not is the idea here maintaing credibity of us New Englanders. Watch one movie one time fits into this lunchpail also. From: The Lenox Correspondent.
-
45 Posted by nikonjimmy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:38PM EDT Report Abuse
You're wrong about the D40 lens setup... it uses an AF-S lens, which has the motor in the lens. The D40 lacks a body motor and AF screw for older AF Nikon lenses. If you want auto focus on the D40 or D40x, you need AF-S lenses, but you will still be able to mount and use the old AF standard without auto focus.
Sponsored Links
My Tech
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
Also on Yahoo! Tech
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Posted by phillips831 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:10PM EDT Report Abuse
i want a kodak but i have a nikon something it from office max. its aweosome still!!!!!!!