<< See all Yahoo! Tech News

TSMC in US$290M Settlement With China's Biggest Chip Maker

  • By Dan Nystedt, IDG News Service - Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:20AM EST
  • Add articles about technology to your My Yahoo! add to My Yahoo!

Recent Tech News Stories

 

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC) reached an out-of-court settlement valued at US$290.2 million with China's biggest chip maker after a court-room victory in a case concerning theft of trade secrets, patent infringement and breach of contract over a prior settlement between the two companies.

As part of the settlement, Semiconductor Manufacturing International (SMIC) will pay TSMC $200 million in cash, as well as stock and warrants that could allow TSMC to take up to a 10 percent stake in SMIC. The stock and warrants were valued at around $90.2 million by Steve Chang, a stock trader at Taishin Securities in Taipei.

Last week, a jury at the Superior Court of California in Alameda County ruled in favor of TSMC, the world's largest contract chip maker, in the case against SMIC, the biggest contract chip maker in China. The court had already started proceedings to determine damages.

The settlement ends all outstanding court action between the two companies, including a remaining US$40 million payment SMIC owes TSMC from a previous case. The deal will also allow SMIC to continue to use TSMC trade secrets and technology disputed in the case.

"SMIC believes this settlement is a win-win for the parties, resolving uncertainty for their employees, mutual customers, and other stakeholders," SMIC said in a statement to the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong.

But the settlement could lead to new problems for TSMC with the government of Taiwan. Regulations on the island prohibit certain technology transfer and investments in China because of long-standing threats by China to invade Taiwan. The island split from China in 1949 amid civil war, and China has regarded Taiwan as a renegade province ever since.

A TSMC spokesman said that regulatory authorities will have to change rules to permit the ownership of stock offered by SMIC as part of the settlement. "This would be a passive ownership of shares," said J.H. Tzeng, deputy spokesman of TSMC.

TSMC will not be allowed to vote for members of SMIC's board of directors with its shares, SMIC said in the statement. TSMC's voting rights will also be restricted to a vote in favor of actions recommended by the board.

SMIC will issue 1.79 billion new shares of its Hong Kong listed stock to TSMC as part of the settlement, or 8 percent of the company after new shares are issued. SMIC will also give TSMC warrants to buy an additional 696 million shares for HK$1.30 per share (US$0.17). Should TSMC opt to exercise the warrants, it would gain another 2 percent of SMIC, for a total ownership of 10 percent of the Chinese chip maker.

The two chip makers first went to court in December 2003, in a patent infringement and trade secrets theft case that was ultimately settled in 2005 with a US$175 million payment to TSMC and a cross-licensing deal. But the relationship turned sour soon after and TSMC filed the current case just a year later.

Product Categories

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio

Today On...

Upgrades thumbnail
Upgrades

Download Internet Explorer 8

Get the new Internet Explorer 8 optimized for Yahoo!. Read More

Yahoo! Search thumbnail
Yahoo! Search

Play full songs for free

Search for music artists and listen to full songs right on the search page. Read More


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.


Copyright © 2009 PC World Communications, Inc.

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.