Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:58PM EDT
See Comments (203)
Imagine...no red eye. Period. Or no need for a flash on a digital camera.
Now that digital camera makers have come up with all kinds of ways to eliminate red eye and improve flash technology while stabilizing images, Kodak says it is developing digital technology that will nearly eliminate the need for a flash (and the oft-accompanying red eye) and improve performance in low-light conditions.
Here's how it would work: The new technology would increase light sensitivity of existing image sensors by two to four times. That means a camera's shutter speed could increase, which would reduce camera shake and blurring problems. If it works, it also would allow photographers to shoot in low light without producing grainy, speckled photos.
The proof is in the pixels. In most digital cameras, each sensor pixel detects either the color red, green, or blue and places them into a pattern named for Bryce Bayer, the Kodak engineer who developed it. With the new high-sensitivity technology, half of the pixels will be panchromatic, or clear, so they will capture only the brightness, not color. That means a 12-megapixel camera would have 6 million panchromatic pixels, 3 million green pixels, 1.5 million red pixels, and 1.5 million blue pixels. In comparison, today's 12-megapixel cameras have 6 million green pixels, 3 million red, and 3 million blue.
The announcement is Kodak's latest big play in an intense bid to rebuild into a digital photography company as its film business dwindles. The company's plan is to make use of its proprietary intellectual property, including this image sensor technology, to compete in the crowded digicam market. Kodak entered the printer business this year with models that are slightly higher priced than competitors' but use ink that retails for about half the cost of other cartridges.
Kodak will build its own cameras with the new technology, but it also plans to sell it to other manufacturers since it works with existing image sensors. The new tech will be available in early 2008, but Kodak has given no word on when the first cameras with it fully built in will be on the market.
On each page in my photo albums of the kids since they were little, there's at least one photo besmirched by red eyes, the scourge of the snap shooter. More and more cameras are including tools to remove red eye in camera, while even the most amateur among us have become pretty adept at removing the demonizing glare with tools on photo software, online photo ordering sites, and in-store kiosks. But built-in technology that eliminates the need to tinker before and post shooting would be a welcome feature in a digital camera.
Is this the kind of feature you've been waiting for in a digital camera?
LINKS: Kodak says camera sensor may eliminate flash [Reuters via Yahoo! News]
Kodak boosts digital camera sensitivity [Cnet News.com]
Editor's note: Thanks for the sharp eyes, readers. This technology would let the shutter speed be increased, not decreased.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Thats really cool, espically if you are someone who takes photos professionally all te time, like lets say a model or actress. I know that the flash on the camera is very annoying after about 5 minutes. I cant wait till this comes out...
that's what I wanna see ...way to go !
"The new technology would increase light sensitivity of existing image sensors by two to four times. That means a camera's shutter speed could be cut in half, or at least a quarter, which would reduce camera shake and blurring problems." Sorry, you got it wrong, Dory. Increasing the light sensitivity would allow the shutter speed to be INCREASED, not decreased. In this case, a camera's shutter speed could be doubled or even quadrupled, which would reduce camera shake and blurring problems.
Nice! How much and what models of cameras.
Great Idea! No more flash or redeye! YAY!!!
Multiplying sensitivity by 2 to 4 times won't eliminate the need for flash with digicams which give noise-free pictures only at the equivalent of about 100 ASA. It will be most useful for high end DSLRs, which have faster lenses and can already produce decent results at about ASA 1600. I'm not sure how much of a mass market that will provide for Kodak, although I would be interested in buying a DSLR able to shoot noise-free at ASA 6400.
I'll believe it when I see it. Kodak digital cameras leave a lot to be desired. They've been surpassed for years by Canon and Nikon (Sony included) in image quality.
As I am in the paparazzi business, I am always put into situations with low light and cannot use a flight. Thanks to this camera... I can get great shots!
I'm glad to see that Kodak is finally getting into the game seriously. However, regardless of how much they innovat, i won't buy a Kodak until they improve the quality of their cameras. When I bought my first Kodak digital camera, it barely operated. The folks at Kodak treated me like crap. Their loss. Since that time I have purchased thousands of dollars worth of digital camera equipment for my business and guess who didn't get a single sale . . . . I'd rather buy my camera equipment from a domestic manufacturer. And I might consider buying another Kodak if the camera came with a VERY long warantee. Until then, I'll spend my money elsewhere.
1 Posted by modembreath on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:24PM EDT Report Abuse
Great!! How much?