Music Industry Steps up Campus Complaints

Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:15PM EST

See Comments (15)

The music industry is stepping up efforts to stanch illegally downloaded music over campus computer networks. The AP reports that the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is sending thousands more complaints to colleges, asking them to take action against individual students who have downloaded music for free over peer-to-peer (P2P) networks.

Music sharing over P2P networks, such as BitTorrent and Gnutella, is as much a part of campus life as keg parties and all-nighters. Many universities take a hands-over-the-eyes approach to file sharing, as Chris Null found at the start of this school year. But some schools are stepping up action in response to the music industry's efforts.

From the AP story:

• At Michigan State University, students caught twice for illegally downloading music files must sit through an anti-piracy DVD made by the RIAA. If they are caught a third time, they can be suspended. The university received 783 complaints from the RIAA in December alone.

• At the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, students get warnings the first and second time they are cited for illegal downloads. The third time, the university shuts down a student's Internet connection and sends the case to a dean for possible further punishment.

• But at Purdue University in Indiana, which received 1,068 complaints so far this year, administrators take another tack. They rarely notifiy students because they do not agree that it's the school's role to track down students, which takes time and resources.

The music industry can identify an individual student who has illegally downloaded a music file only by his or her numerical Internet address. Only the school has the ability to trace that address to identify an individual student by name.

To all the parents who are wondering what all this is about, check out this P2P primer post for an overview of peer-to-peer networks and sharing files. 

At the heart of this is the battle over DRM (digital rights management) and whether it's time for the music industry to find another way to protect copyrighted music. (Check out this USA Today story on this issue.) As Steve Jobs said in his now-famous open letter to the music industry, only 2 percent of music found on iPods is purchased from the iTunes store.  In the meantime, college students shouldn't be surprised if they find emails in their inboxes saying they've got some 'splaining to do.

Related:

A Survey of U.S. Universities' Peer-to-Peer Policies
P2P Primer for Parents 
Steve Jobs Finally Stands up Against DRM. Sort of

Comments on Music Industry Steps up Campus Complaints

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by henry_o2@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    The goodwill between music lovers and the recording industry is the toilet. Corporations are flexing their might not jus in the mainstream media but also through the internet, which we all paid already. Is all about maximizing profits.

  • 2 Posted by g702tt on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm not into music so I don't engage in the downloading. But my friend brags about doing this all the time. I can just see whats going to happen. He will be out 3K.

  • 3 Posted by texr8rh8r on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    Now, Come on folks, RIAA has a big responsibility here. Who else is gonna make sure they have enough money to keep their Porches shining and pay some group enough money to keep them in coke for a life time?? I remember $2.99 LP's. Now it's $16.00 CD's. Makes ya wonder?????

  • 4 Posted by badlywicked105 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    The RIAA are the real thieves, so they don't have the right to complain. They have ripped off, and short changed so many artists of the years that going after downloaders is like the pot calling the kettel black. They shouldn't be allowed to sue anybody. They should see downloadings value as a advertising vehicle, and learn how to take advantage of the technology instead whining about any losses from it.

  • 5 Posted by nolmtha on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    Seriously...come on man...from my standpoint...if someone downloads your music then they like your stuff...if I were them I'd be worried that they weren't downloading mine...and as a comment to boocnew man look...these people make 50,000 a show man...so when you talk about them supporting their families, thats exactly what that does...not going against you...you do have a valid point but the way you worded it isn't quite clear...maybe they should stop making 1 hit per cd that sounds nice and when you go by the cd its garbage except for that one song...

  • 6 Posted by idreamer24 on Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:34AM EDT Report Abuse

    sorry boocnew but they rarely use their money to support their families. they normally use their concert money or signing bonus to take care of their family and then the rest of the money they get is used on expensive rare cars and diamond jewelry, which aren't a necessity at all.

  • 7 Posted by phishfearme on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    correct me if i'm wrong but DOWNLOADING for PERSONAL USE is not what'll get you in trouble - it's OPENING OR SHARING copywrited material that's illegal. if you download for your own use and never share from there, i belive you're legal. anybody know for sure??

  • 8 Posted by tnysallee on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    Ok, now don't misunderstand this, because stealing IS wrong, BUT... If the already rich people are worried about the extra money they aren't receiving, maybe they should lower the prices of CDs so more people will consider that option... I don't have the budget for a 16 or more dollar CD that will be "yesterday's music" in no time... I only buy CDs when it's timeless stuff like the Eagles or Elvis... I don't see it as a loss for them. If I couldn't borrow and copy a friends CD I would have just lived without the music. I would not have bought it, so they never would have had my money either way... I think the big execs need to stop and realize that kids are working around their prices because they are getting outrageous... Lower CD prices and watch more people buy the album themselves...

  • 9 Posted by chrstnparada on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    it would be better if there were a bottom line to music downloads :there's always payment to be done because free stuff are too good to be true! however,why charge $3,000 to college students who probably have to take time off to pay this amount off? it may be legal,but sounds more like revenge. the amount doesn't always add to that amount to pay off the illegal downloads.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment