Windows Performance Tweaks Debunked

Mon Sep 1, 2008 11:52PM EDT

See Comments (27)

Who doesn't want another couple of seconds shaved off their startup or application load time, or an extra few frames per second in their favorite game?

Windows tweakers will go to outrageous tweaks to "tune up" their systems, but how many of those tweaks actually do any good? The truth: Just about none.

Lifehacker has one of the most comprehensive looks at the common performance tweak advice I've seen. It pretty much dismisses everything you might have heard as bunk. Among the highlights:

  • > Disabling QoS will not speed up your computer at all. (One rumor says that Windows reserves "20 percent of your bandwidth" for Windows Update... which is pretty absurd if you think about it.
  • > Clearing out the Prefetch in Windows XP won't speed up your machine, either. This one's been going around the block for years. Deleting the Prefetch folder files simply won't help anything.
  • > "Optimizing your RAM" is useless. Plenty of downloadable products make great claims that they can speed up your system if you just run a simple application to "optimize your RAM." The same logic applies here that does to those selling gizmos to give your car better mileage: If they really worked, the manufacturer (in this case, Microsoft) would have included the software in Windows to begin with, right?
  • > Turning off System Restore won't speed up your system. (It will save you hard drive space, though.)

A couple of points on the post are a little more controversial.

Yes, turning off services can destabilize your system, but there is plenty of stuff in the average Windows services list that is total junk: Various quick-launchers, duplicate management utilities, and the like. The problem comes in knowing what you can disable and what you need to keep your machine stable. Lifehacker offers good advice in suggesting you show only non-Windows services before you start hacking away, but its suggestion that some people may actually want to hang on to the useless Windows Defender is silly. Contrary to Lifehacker's advice, disabling unneeded services will likely make your rig more stable, not less.

Finally there's the issue of registry cleaner utilities. Lifehacker says never to use them, but I've seen the proof in the pudding: Seriously slow systems can benefit from a registry cleaning, at least when it comes to startup time. Yes, your best advice is to upgrade the amount of RAM in your machine, but I disagree that Registry cleaners never work.

Give the story a spin here.

Comments on Windows Performance Tweaks Debunked

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by johnbradshaw@ymail.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think that this article shows just a few of the reasons that I switched to a Macintosh; no more defragging, registry, ram-jogging or antispyware, BSOD, endless Windows updates (until SP3), or unexplained long boot times. I'm not a fan or anyhong but reading this article just reminded me of all those wonderful nights in front of my PC and I got the chills.

  • 2 Posted by bucs10us on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    Actually, installing a computer chip for your truck can add about two miles per gallon. This made a huge difference in my Chevy 2500 HD Diesel.

  • 3 Posted by linuxdad on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    Best way to speed up a PC is to go to Linux. Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Debian just anything other than Microsoft will speed your PC up, improve performance, increase functionality, no anti-virus software required. Its totally free Go Linux, go now!

  • 5 Posted by alexgannis on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have Registry Cleaner and agree it does work but not as good it doesn't clean out all old software registry like they claim to. Which make me think what a rip off.

  • 6 Posted by muscogeekid on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    Chris, this is a little frustrating for us mid-level users. I'm not a hacker, but I'm not a know-nothing about computers, either. You have debunked the debunker, so knowing who is right becomes difficult. And can anyone explain why a total system reinstall almost always results in a better running system?

  • 7 Posted by aa4mw on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    Essentially htis is a problem with an closed system! There is simply no way to knoe if a particualr tweak is doing nay good. Only one of the reasons thta Linux shows much better performance. I have substituded SUSE Linux for Vista on my new AMD Quad machine and it really flys now. It was slower than my old Athlon 1800+ machine (running Win 2k). Best part - there is less hassle migrating to SUSE Linux from XP than there was migrating to Vista!

  • 8 Posted by jirojas on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    Windows suck. I prefer my Mac 100%.

  • 9 Posted by jirojas on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    Windows suck. I prefer my Mac 100%.

  • 10 Posted by grandpagumby on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    Where can I get more info about changing my Windows system to Linux ? What effect will the switch have on my e-mail accounts ? Can I expect to lose my Office program, if so, does Linux offer something comparable?

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment