Flight attendants: Please, no porn on the plane

Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:31PM EDT

See Comments (24)

Has it really come to this? American Airlines' flight attendants are asking their employer to block access to pornographic websites from its new in-air Internet service, as they are concerned about abuses of the system by randy passengers.

Can you imagine? Sadly, I can. From time to time this has already been an issue, say flight attendants, with passengers that have printed or pre-recorded video matter. But opening up the skies to the Internet obviously presents a far wider opportunity for airborne porn: Now you don't have to plan ahead to bring your adult material on the plane, it's right there whenever you, ahem, need it.

The issue now becomes whether installing filters is a prudent idea, as it opens up questions of censorship and "how far" is OK for the company to block. Is it OK to shop for bikinis in the air? Read about disturbing medical conditions? It's the same kind of issues that have plagued libraries and other keepers of public Internet access terminals, only you can't simply ask someone to leave the building when you're at 30,000 feet.

Right now things work on a case by case basis and at the discretion of the flight attendants, and that would probably be fine going forward. But flight attendants are not out of line asking management to ward off problems before they start, if for no other reason than to avoid uncomfortable situations with passengers. Potential legal situations could also arise from passengers who felt harassed by exposure to inappropriate images being viewed by other passengers.

Should airlines proactively limit web access, and, if so, how far should they go? Sound off in the comments!

LINK: American Air Attendants Urge Filters to Bar Web Porn

Comments on Flight attendants: Please, no porn on the plane

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by bobbybob3680 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    woaah i mean it would be kinda weird for some dude to pull out his meat and just start wackin away in the sky

  • 2 Posted by vanmo92 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    At least go to the bathroom to do that.

  • 3 Posted by coolkyle4@snet.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    i would never watch porn with other ppl next 2 me, its jus disturbing, and well, i dont want other ppl 2 masterbate next 2 me

  • 5 Posted by synergy1154 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    xrated, sure block it. Or better yet, apply a fine to passengers. But if you have to start running sites through proxy's just to check your email, it will be more trouble than its worth.

  • 6 Posted by vixengal on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm really surprised that they don't simply let people browse wherever they want to go, and then have agents waiting when the offenders de-plane. In fact, why not bait the passengers? Isn't entrapment on the internet accepted now? In some jurisdictions, it's a favored means of showing how incumbents are strong on crime, and worthy of re-election!

  • 7 Posted by stejowal on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    Which is it, Chris: "attendent" or "attendant?" I know which is correct, but you used both!!

  • 8 Posted by wolverinemarky on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    lol stop picking on chris, I personally wouldnt want to watch porn with that many people sitting around me. We have to remember that kids fly on these planes as well and they dont need to be exposed to all of that. So i personally wouldnt be bothered if they blocked porn sites from in air internet.

  • 9 Posted by zwomann on Thu Sep 3, 2009 11:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think that all porn should be .xxx instead of .com and that any hotspot where screens can be viewed by more than just the computer operator can block that domain. I really thought .xxx was a good idea... as a mom and as someone who enjoys porn.

  • 10 Posted by pcofmind1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why limit it to laptops? I say let's provide porn for in-flight entertainment on the big-screen. Seriously, I see this as a non-issue. Sure, there will be some idiots insensitive enough to crank some porn, but these will be isolated incidents, simply because of the cramped-space factor. Much easier in, say, a library or Internet cafe'. I'm far more peeved at the idiot cellphone users who seem to think their conversation is important enough for the world to hear. Put a muzzle on 'em. If you are one of them, you have no idea who you are, as you're oblivious to your noise pollution.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment