Tue Dec 2, 2008 2:36PM EST
See Comments (22)
If it seems that every computer company in the world (except Apple, of course) has an inexpensive netbook on the market, that's because they do. These cheap, low-power laptops have been all the rage for a year and counting.
Now Intel, whose Atom chip powers the bulk of today's netbooks, is rethinking the category. While originally envisioned as way to extend technology to emerging markets, children, and other price-sensitive environments, actual sales of the devices show a somewhat different picture. Most netbooks aren't being sold to these users at all, but rather to upscale customers in North America and Europe, where they're being used as a "grab and go" laptop by users who already have a primary use machine.
As such, Intel is calling the netbook "mostly incremental" to their market, implying that sales will not be sustainable since they are coming from existing buyers and not new overseas markets, as had been hoped.
Overall the company seems largely bearish on the device that has, in many minds, saved the computing category from being devastated by the economic recession, complaining (as many have) that their low power and small size makes them bearable for an hour at a time, and that's about it. AMD isn't making a netbook-focused chip, either, instead choosing to focus on thin and light laptops -- which command far higher prices. The company is on record as saying that it is completely "ignoring the netbook phenomenon."
For now, at least, netbooks are still selling incredibly strongly. Yesterday's Cyber Monday tally showed netbooks dominating the tech category at Amazon.com, with the top six computer products sold being mini-notebooks. How long can these pint-sized 'puters keep this up? And what will happen if they suddenly stop their mad domination of the market?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
i heard that they suck. which they probably do. btw pcofmind, HPs suck. just a little information.
I bought an Acer Aspire One a month or so ago. It's far superior to the Nokia 770 that I have, which is really only useful for truly rudimentary tasks. The Acer replaced my aging Toshiba. Granted, I still have a C2D-powered desktop for my heavyweight computing, but the netbook is a perfect adjunct to a more powerful and more costly machine (e.g., MBA). If Intel and AMD don't want to serve this market, they're leaving themselves wide open to be disrupted from below by a company like Via if they can get their price/performance in balance with the demonstrated minimum requirements of the Atom.
Netbooks are too expensive for the emerging African markets and 3rd world countries... $500 just wont cut it, anything above $200 will be hard to sell in the 3rd world (except for a very few people and organizations who also want it for a grab and go machine)
dakotazgirl101, how is that 'information?' That's just your uninformed opinion, judging by your 'they probably do' comment. If you're going to criticize something, you might want to either try it, or get a bit more 'information' than 'i [sic] heard they suck'.
Well i have Acer one and i love it , there is free wi fi , alot of open networks. The Mac air is too costly but i may up grade to the Samsung ten someday.
I think these net-book thigys have a real potential! ALthough I have only read about them... It seems if the manufacturers add a cheap touchscreen and swivleing monitor. Which by my guestimation wouldn;t really add much to the Price. They could become an iphone killer espesially if this newly availiable wireless spectrum can provide cheap and really high speed internet to the billions... But they (the manufacurers would need a brilliant and visionary CEO like me to pull that off.... Hehehe.
stupid. an iphone or itouch will perform better. i would just save up for a better laptop because that is a waste of money.
So, you "heard" they suck, so they probably do? Wow, are you gullible...
NETBOOKS are in NO WAY A FAD !!!! - simply a smaller, cheaper, fully capable NOTEBOOK. I am a FULL-TIME IT guy, on-the-go, and I also work from home. I have a MSI Wind ... IT ROCKS !!! . I can install any software I need, and I do alot of remote support and code-writing. At home, for long-time use, I can quickly hook-up a large LCD monitor, USB keyboard and mouse, and I have no cares about what kind of "horsepower" is under the hood. IT's PLENTY for 99% of the people out there. On the road, I can move around an office one-handing the netbook as I go... If companies can make a profit retailing them at $350 ( what I paid ) GREAT !!!! - KEEP IT UP !!!!
1 Posted by pcofmind1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:04PM EDT Report Abuse
I guess I "kind of" understand the netbook thing, but I'd think that one would be better served by simply carrying around a couple more pounds and a bit bulkier to have a fully-loaded, screaming fast lappy that would run circles around these netbooks -- See Apple Macbook Air (paper thin, light as a feather) and the HP line of TX mobile touch-screen tablet PCs (12.1" and a 180-degree adjustable screen -- I want one!). Impressive and light & portable. If, however, you just must downsize further, drop down to an iPhone or Crackberry. I see the netbook as the modern-day equivalent of glorified Smith-Corona typewriter. Sufficient for limited purposes.