Memorization useless for the "Google generation"

Wed Dec 3, 2008 1:04PM EST

See Comments (20)

Quick, when was the Battle of Hastings?* Like most of us, I was forced to memorize useless information like this throughout my grade school years, data that -- unless Jeopardy! ever decides to invite me to appear on the show -- will do nothing but take up space in my brain.

Now one expert is questioning the value of rote memorization of dates, names, and places, suggesting that the Internet and the easy access it offers to what is essentially historical trivia has made such memorization of limited, or even negative, value. Per a story in the Telegraph, writer Don Tapscott "suggests a better approach would be to teach children to think creatively so they could learn to interpret and apply the knowledge available online."

There's value to this idea if one assumes that a child can only learn so much during one day of class. I'd certainly rather my daughter understand the reasons why the Black Plague occurred rather than her worrying about exactly what day it started. But I also wonder whether these are mutually exclusive: Is it really possible to teach one without the other?

Another big problem with Tapscott's thesis: The Internet isn't exactly the world's most reliable source of information. While broadly-known historical information is usually correct, I'm sure it wouldn't take much searching to find someone out there who put up a web page explaining the Civil War... and getting the dates completely wrong. That said, books and teachers aren't infallible either.

I'm curious about the readers' thoughts on this one. In an era where "lightning speed" is required of workers and students, is memorization of "facts and figures a waste of time" or should we be less hasty when it comes to giving up our tried and true old ways? Your thoughts appreciated.

POLL: What do you think?

*Answer:1066

Comments on Memorization useless for the "Google generation"

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by petefritzsching on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    Thanks! This is a good article. Why memorize trivia or anything else when it is available on line.

  • 2 Posted by joshm2k5 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    Even Einstein said that you don't need to memorize anything you can look up in a book! Obviously knowing WWI came before WWII is important, but knowing the dates of every important battle isn't, Especially if it's a general class for elementary school. I can see knowing if you planned on working in a museum or something relavent to history though. And yes, the internet is a very unreliable tool. That should be taught more than anything.

  • 3 Posted by dodgerdude@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    Great article, Chris! I think that there will always be use for memorization in education because it is an important tool to practice. That said, if I needed to know the exact date of a battle, I could look that up from my phone anywhere with cell phone reception. I also agree that as we move forward into the digital era, more focus needs to be placed on the circumstances and detail of historical events and how they affected society than on the specific numbers and dates.

  • 4 Posted by simpleman5457625 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    College student here. Rote memorization is rather pointless unless you absolutely need it for your job or in life threating situations. Many teachers I've had over the years have realized this and are moving towards less memorization of facts when possible. Why spend four hours memorizing something that takes twenty seconds or less to find using google? Specific information should be left to books though, since people can be @sses on the intrawebs.

  • 5 Posted by vnobriga on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree that memorization maybe outdated and that creative thinking and problem solving skills should be cultivated. But I also believe that students or anyone obtaining information from the Internet should be taught to not believe everything they read on the Internet as fact and to be able to research whether or not the data they are getting is accurate and reliable before using it in any important project. valarie

  • 6 Posted by crazycoolme@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    As a student I can first hand tell you that schools are now focusing less on memorizing dates and focusing more on the why. For instance they will give you a piece of literature and you will have to be able to interpret it instead of for instance giving the biography of the author. Teachers know that its pointless to memorize because of the internet and ease of obtaining information... unfortunately for me, there still is some because you cant completely get rid of the memorization, you still need a base of which you can interpret from.

  • 7 Posted by jseyfield on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    I always thought memorization, especially in history is stupid. I actually love history but I think it's more important to understand concepts than dates. Like knowing the date for when Lincoln issued the Gettysburg address is not as important as why he gave that speech and the implications of it.

  • 8 Posted by eragon3442 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    Check out Pacific Coast High School at http://www.pchs.k12.ca.us/ This is one of principles!

  • 9 Posted by lylefran@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    A number of people dislike history because they were required to memorize so many dates without understanding the significance of the events. That said, I don't think it should be memorization vs critical or creative thinking. They all play a part. The practice of memorizing in childhood strengthens your memory. In certain jobs (actors, waiters etc.)it is essential. In most jobs we do memorizing codes, procedures and products helps us work efficiently. Remember, your memory is just like everyone else -- it likes to be trusted.

  • 10 Posted by allutz3rd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wikipedia is more accurate than most of the words coming out of a teacher's mouth.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment