Driver wants his cell phone back, erects billboard in protest

Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:40AM EST

See Comments (41)

Most Californians appreciate the recently-enacted cell phone law that prohibits drivers from using a handset while they're behind the wheel (headsets and speakerphones are OK, however), but a vocal minority have a decidedly opposite opinion on the matter.

One Californian, Grant Paulson of Pleasanton, has taken his displeasure with the law to an unlikely venue: A billboard (costing $10,000) on Highway 101, the San Francisco Bay Area's main traffic corridor to Silicon Valley.

Paulson's anger takes the form of a 75-word message to the Senator who authored the law, reading: "Senator Joe Simitian: Your cell phone law sucks. Amazing how 1 man's bad idea can screw over & inconvenience millions of people in CA. Let's overturn this law in the next election & protect what rights we still have left."

In an interview, Paulson's major complaint seemed to be that the quality of connection over Bluetooth headsets or speakerphones is "comical," and he says he wants a ballot measure to repeal the law.

For his part, Senator Simitian said he loved the billboard, calling it a "hoot."

The billboard has divided drivers who frequently use 101, with some rallying behind Paulson's cry for drivers' personal liberties to be restored, but many others calling the billboard distracting (that's a lot of reading at 65 miles an hour) and its language offensive. The California Highway Patrol and Caltrans transportation agency have obviously fielded complaints, but both seem unable to legally do anything to remove the billboard, which is currently paid up through the end of the month.

Freedom of expression or dangerous distraction? You make the call... as long as it's hands-free, at least.

Comments on Driver wants his cell phone back, erects billboard in protest

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by jairaj on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    I saw that billboard on my recent move to the bay area. You're right its hard to read however during rush hour I had plenty of time to read and contemplate the message but I never understood what he was protesting. Having been almost run over many a time by people on handsets I think ear pieces are better. if you don't like blue tooth do what I do- use the free wired in ear piece that comes free with the phone... the quality is impeccable.

  • 2 Posted by wxgddss on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think it's a great bill-board. That said after receiving a ticket last week in Sacramento for scoffing at said law. Boo!

  • 3 Posted by janettwokay on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    A car is for driving from Point A to Point B. If anyone needs to use a telephone, pull off the road and use it. When you're done, get back on the road and continue your drive to Point B. It sounds like Grant Paulson needs to buy a clue. It's a shame that he wasted his money on a billboard. That money would have been better spent by being donated to charity.

  • 4 Posted by joshm2k5 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree this law should be removed from the books. Although there are no such laws where I'm from, it is a pointless law. People who are dumb enough to become so involved with a phone call while driving, deserve to get in an accident. People who are dumb enough to talk on the phone while crossing the street and not looking for traffic, deserve to get hit! Not only are bluetooth links easily hacked by the person in the car behind you, why must this country coddle to the morons? Stupid hurts, a lesson I learned years ago.

  • 5 Posted by coolkyle4@snet.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    The whole billboard thing is stupid. Use less words next time. Still, the law is stupid because of the reasoning behind it. If I'm using part of my brain to talk to you on a cell while holding it, its not gonna take LESS of my brain to work if its bluetooth. People still are stupid and create these laws.

  • 7 Posted by terry.cobb on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    coolkyle, I agree. Outlaw ALL cell phone use while driving. Josh, said people that are dumb enough to talk on the phone deserve to get in an accident. What about the person NOT talking that i----- ?

  • 8 Posted by dmb4school on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    joshm2k5 : Stupid hurts, a lesson I learned years ago. So, you must be in constant pain. NO ONE DESERVES TO BE IN AN ACCIDENT OR HIT BY A CAR, and what about the innocent parties in the accidents. "Stupid" may hurt but thinking your fellow man deserve pain and death for talking on the phone or letting theirselves be destracted is more than stupid, its idiotic, so tell us, how does that feel?

  • 9 Posted by grndlprm on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    Got to love how the inconvience of one person suddenly makes it OK for thousands of people to be put in harms way every day. Talk about self centered. Besides if Mr. Paulson knew how to manage his time properly he would not have to spend all his driving time also chatting on the phone.

  • 10 Posted by anson_lego on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    The more laws there are, the more people will will break them. It shouldn't be a law, but as highly recommended in drivers ed "to not use a cell phone while driving".

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment