Xerox tries again with wax-based color printer

Thu May 7, 2009 11:48AM EDT

See Comments (6)

While I wouldn't go nearly as far as the Wall Street Journal in calling Xerox's new ColorQube printer "revolutionary," I will say it's nice to see the company dredge an old technology out of the dustbin to give it another go.

The idea: Replace the liquid ink or particle-based toner in printer cartridges with a third option: solid blocks of colored wax. That wax is heated and melted during the printing process, then sprayed onto the paper as it is fed through the machine.

Xerox has tried this before, beginning in 2004, when it launched the Phaser 8400, a $999 printer using the solid-ink technology. Not much bigger than a black-and-white laser printer at the time, the printer was met with respectable reviews but was dinged for iffy black-and-white text printing. The printer never really caught on in a major way, but various model Phasers are still available today and the technology has rumbled along accordingly.

Now Xerox is doubling down with the ColorQube, which tinkers with the wax formula and ups the price of the printer to a cool $20,000. (The price difference is partly explained by the fact that this is a much faster (85 pages per minute max), larger-capacity printer designed for use by dozens of people at a time in a network setting; the Phaser is more of a personal or small workgroup printer.)

The real sell: You'll save a ton of money vs. traditional color laser prints; by Xerox's math, ColorQube prints are 68% cheaper than laser. There are also minor environmental benefits, as the wax sticks are completely consumed during the printing process; there's no plastic case that has to be discarded or recycled when it runs out of toner. (On the other hand, solid ink printers often use more power because of the heat needed to melt the wax.)

Will cheaper per-page prices convince enterprises to uproot their laser- and ink-based environments in favor of these upscale crayons? For Xerox, which has seen overall office printing start to decline, it certainly hopes so... as long as the printer they're getting rid of isn't another Xerox model.

Comments on Xerox tries again with wax-based color printer

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by rogueist on Thu May 7, 2009 2:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    $20K is a great price for a professional printer. Personally, I like the $150K printer that reproduces oil paintings - I would like to try printing one of my works on that one day.

  • 2 Posted by jammer2k@sbcglobal.net on Thu May 7, 2009 3:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    hmm, sounds like Tektronics technology redux. The tektronics printers were nice but the resulting printed page had some limitations, mostly that anything hot would remelt the wax so don't photocopy or use clear sheets for overhead projection (who uses that tech anymore?)

  • 3 Posted by dude_yer_gittin_a_dell on Thu May 7, 2009 3:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    I used a Phaser 860 in our small office since January 2003. They are phenominal printers. Very reliable and great print quality. As an added bonus, anything printed on standard copy paper appears as if you used glossy paper because the wax has a glossy shine to it. Nice little bonus. It's cheaper than laser and produces probably a 10th or less of the waste as laser, no imagine drum, transfer kit or bulky toner cases to replace. The only wast is the small plastic case the wax comes in and the maintenance kit which is just a dense rubber/foam roller that lubes up the drum before image transfers. Also, another bonus to wax printers vs toner is you can use 3rd party wax cubes MUCH more reliably than refilled toner that may leak or have the wrong particle size.

  • 4 Posted by cnull on Thu May 7, 2009 6:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    jammer2k - this is the Tektronics technology; Xerox acquired the company some years ago...

  • 5 Posted by schnoorsean on Thu May 14, 2009 9:27AM EDT Report Abuse

    Is the ink cheaper than traditional ink? Ac Of Vero Beach www.acofverobeach.com

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment