Two battery breakthroughs in the works

Tue May 19, 2009 5:04PM EDT

See Comments (20)

Today's a big day for those of us obsessed with battery tech, with two new technologies in the works which promise to increase capacity for power packs -- if they manage to make it to market.

Up first is a new spin on the traditional lithium battery, which uses sulfur as part of the cathode in the cell instead of the more traditional metal oxides used today. To solve a decades-old challenge, a nanoscale carbon structure is used to trap liquefied sulfur, keeping the sulfur in electrical contact in sufficient surface area to work as a component of the battery.

The upshot is that the new sulfur-based design can theoretically store three times the energy of a traditional lithium-ion battery of the same size. And since sulfur is in such abundance -- sulfur is a by-product of oil and gas production and the stuff piles up in small mountains outside many refineries -- there's certainly no worry that we'll run out of it in the foreseeable future. Patents have been filed.

Battery breakthrough #2 involves the use of technology that would allow batteries to be recharged by simple exposure to the air. Also using a carbon lattice like the lithium-sulfur cell described above, oxygen molecules are drawn from the air and become trapped in the matrix for use as part of the chemical reaction in the battery. When spent, the battery can draw in more oxygen, allowing a sort of natural recharging to occur as the battery operates and giving it a theoretical running time up to 10 times that of a non-air-based cell. And, because air is weightless, the battery cell is lighter than a typical chemical cell.

The so-called STAIR cell isn't as far along as the lithium-sulfur cell, and prototypes are still being developed. However, if all goes well, it could be a suitable battery for many applications ranging from cell phones to electric cars -- anywhere where reducing weight is of special concern.

Comments on Two battery breakthroughs in the works

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by nerd160 on Tue May 19, 2009 5:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    The sulfur based battery sounds great. I hate running out of battery power, especially when I need it.

  • 2 Posted by claylof on Tue May 19, 2009 5:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    Air is not heavy, but weightless?

  • 3 Posted by coyoteman on Tue May 19, 2009 6:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    Air has mass but is neutrally buoyant and therefore weightless.

  • 4 Posted by dcsoccer25 on Tue May 19, 2009 6:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yes, air has mass, but for all intents and purposes it's weightless unless you're doing calculations that require the utmost in accuracy. For most people, weightless works, so stop nitpicking. As far as the battery ideas go, I think they're genius. The sulfur idea is especially intriguing. Is this one of the cases where the new technology will be better, cheaper, and more efficient all at the same time?

  • 5 Posted by alexgannis on Tue May 19, 2009 7:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    Its sound like it full of air to me who cares.

  • 6 Posted by alkasi2000 on Tue May 19, 2009 9:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    alexgannis I care. and I think this is an amazing idea that if put to good use, can save a lot of money. You are the one who sounds like you're full of air.

  • 7 Posted by rogueist on Tue May 19, 2009 10:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    The so-called "air battery" is the same technique that has been used in batteries for nearly 50 years. Nothing new there - just a refinement on the technology to use less materials and more air. As for the lithium batteries - the ORIGINAL lithium batteries used sulfur - nothing new there. There must be something different about the general processing that allows them to get a patent - otherwise this is not patentable.

  • 8 Posted by jaraddoyon on Tue May 19, 2009 11:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yes air is technically weightless, it however is not Mass-less. They are physics terms you can look up. Your weight on the moon is 1/6 that of it on earth, but your mass is the same everywhere.

  • 10 Posted by headphonedude on Wed May 20, 2009 1:49AM EDT Report Abuse

    now what would be great is if they made a carbon based battery (uses carbon-dioxide instead of o2 ) killing two birds with one stone, reduce carbon footprint on gadgets and help reduce greenhouse gasses.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment