Microsoft tries second stab at security software (get the free beta here)

Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:51PM EDT

See Comments (14)

Microsoft products are notoriously full of security holes, but as an industry we've come to accept and deal with that. Even Microsoft has conceded the issue, launching its own security tool, Windows Defender (based on software it acquired from a company called GIANT AntiSpyware), in late 2006.

Kudos for being proactive. The only problem was that Defender was functionally useless. Regularly relegated to also-ran status in product reviews, Defender simply didn't seem to do anything. In my experience it was completely helpless at discovering or removing anything beyond the simplest of malware infestations.

As a result, Microsoft announced it would discontinue the program last year as it worked on a replacement, and that replacement, Microsoft Security Essentials, is now available as a beta, beginning today.

Based on its OneCare product, the new Microsoft Security Essentials, or MSE, is a free offering, but you'll have to go through some hoops to get it. Click the above link, then click "Get it now." You'll need a Microsoft Connect account (which in turn requires a Windows Live ID), and you'll have to answer some survey questions about how you use your computer. Software validation is also required along the way. Eventually you'll get to a page where you can download one of three versions of the software, an XP version, a 32-bit Vista/Windows 7 version, or a 64-bit Vista/Windows 7 version. Download and install like you would any normal application.

Reportedly this beta is limited to the first 75,000 downloads (though there's no mention of that on the MSE download page), so you might want to download it quickly if you're interested.

MSE (formerly known under the code name "Morro") offers real-time scanning for viruses and spyware, and, mercifully, a dead-simple interface. It's actually far more difficult to download than it is to use, and while I can't comment yet on how effective it is at scanning for security problems, it does at least do a thorough job of scouring your file system for them. Scans proceed relatively quickly, and status updates are clear and easy to understand.

Is this a replacement for the antivirus software you're running right now? I wouldn't uninstall your security program just to run this one (and remember, don't try running two security suites simultaneously), but if you're currently without a security package, this isn't a bad one to try out (it's free, after all) -- as long as you remember you're really a beta tester.

Comments on Microsoft tries second stab at security software (get the free beta here)

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 2 Posted by d_gunde on Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Comments work fine :) I'm glad we will be getting something besides defender. It really is a pain to install AVG and Spybot on every machine I get, and it would be nice to have something ready to go when I install Windows in the future.

  • 3 Posted by keith_adams52 on Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    Will be interesting to see how long it takes to find 75,000 takers. They should stick with trying to make a bug-free OS. If they want a side line that won't cause them problems then they should pick something simple like shoelaces.

  • 4 Posted by rogueist on Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    As usual for security products, I wait for the fallout after the first release. When they get to their 3rd or 4th update release it might be mature enough for someone to try out since the initial bugs should be worked out. But personally I am not in any hurry for a new security product. I am using Avast! and Zone Alarm on my Windows computers right now, and that mix seems to be working for finding, removing and blocking new viruses.

  • 5 Posted by ptm109_2008 on Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why not just come out with an O.S. that doesn't require all the security patches and updates. While I realize that the Mac line up does not have the same market share that Windows does, it is nice to know that I dont have to worry about all the viruses and glitches that come along with windows. I do still own an XP desktop, but I hardly use it anymore. Just when I need to see 2 webpages at the same time without flipping between screens. Its just a suggestion that Windows should come out with a more stable OS for the money they charge for the product.

  • 6 Posted by alexgannis on Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree Window defender is useless and it should have been remove in Window 7 RC1 release, now it look like it will be finally remove in Window 7 finale release.

  • 7 Posted by alexgannis on Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    ptm109_2008 the money they charge for Window OS is a lot cheaper then what you paid for your $3000 wrothless mac.

  • 8 Posted by aa4mw on Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    The number of viruses and malware on Mac and Linux (NONE!) vs Windows tells the story! It sure is nice not to have to run all that carp every time I start up!

  • 9 Posted by btedrogers on Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:44AM EDT Report Abuse

    alex,$3000 wrothless mac? and your the person telling people to buck up and pay the extra for a new comp to run vista, stick to the threads and stop being so threatened by peoples choice of a different platform, everyone has their opinion, and choice, BTW of coarse windows OS is a lot cheaper than a Mac computer, think about it!

  • 10 Posted by alexgannis on Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    btedrogers opinion goes both ways and negative input on window doesn't cut it. I'm not being threaten because WINDOW is better.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment