Windows Vista Not Selling So Well

Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:48PM EST

See Comments (25)

I'm shocked! Shocked, I say! Windows Vista, Microsoft's second-worst operating system ever (Windows Millennium is the all time cellar dweller) isn't exactly flying off the shelves. The numbers are positively grim: Compared to Windows XP's original release, Vista sold 59 percent fewer copies in its first week. (Because Vista is so ungodly expensive, sales in dollar volume is only 32 percent lower.)

That isn't just interesting, it's shocking. Not only would those be catastrophic numbers in a normal comparison, but XP was released six years ago. Think about how many more computers (and computer users) there are on the market today. There may be a bright side for Microsoft: New PC sales are up over 2006, reflecting the well-known truism that Vista doesn't run well on older hardware. However, Microsoft earns far less for OEM copies of Windows than it does for shrinkwrapped copies.

Still, Vista is selling better today than XP was last year, which is good news for the company: Its brand-new product is outselling an ancient one that everyone already owns. Analysts are also noting that businesses seem to be buying more copies of Vista than expected, and that Vista's high price should offset the lower unit sales to consumers. Great for Microsoft. Bad for you and me.

Oh, and if you're still wondering why people aren't lining up to get their paws on Vista, check out PC World's "Most Annoying Things" about it. It's pretty much dead-on with its analysis of what's broken... and I can think of a few things I'd like to add to that list myself.

Comments on Windows Vista Not Selling So Well

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by mjcrunk@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    I went "window shopping" today to scope out what I'd been reading. Four national franchise stores later, I knew less than when I started. The stores and personnel were not ready to answer questions. No operational computers available to actually see how the various brands worked. How does one shop to buy?

  • 2 Posted by brickleigh on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    Make your life a whole lot easier...get a Mac.

  • 3 Posted by clhensley2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have 3 good working PCs, and none of them qualify for the new VISTA, without about $200.00 each in upgrades. If this continues I'll just live with Win XP for a while. I know I used Win 98 2nd Edition for a long time because of the expense and problems with Win 2000 and Millenium Edition (terrible product). Microsoft has completely forgotten the average PC user in favor of profit. I hope Win Vista is the thing that will wake up Microsoft.

  • 4 Posted by jnvader001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    It's just more hyped crap that's forced upon us. I dont care if i ever use it.

  • 5 Posted by tommy.bannister@btinternet.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    every body that has the new vista has lost inmportant data and has advised people to stay away from it who can blame people from staying away from the new opperating system when XP is about the best so far.I for one will get it when these comments blow down after micro gets it right

  • 6 Posted by richarddaigle2006 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why is anyone surprised about Vista ? Microsoft has a record of never having a product right when they first put it on the market, it takes them at least a year to ever get most of the bugs out. Microsoft has only one goal to make Bill Gates even more money. I personally won't be using Vista 1. because I'm not going to spend a few hundred dollars to upgrade my computer, and 2. I don't want to go through constant patches and hot fixes they find after the system is compromised by all the hackers. Better idea, save your money and buy a Mac, might be more expensive, but everyone I know who has one says they never have the problems PC does.

  • 7 Posted by nickdc1960 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am still running Windows 98 with great success. It does everything I NEED it to do and most of the things I WANT it to do. Windows Vista? Yeah, I remember reading about MicoSoft's "Longhorn" OS about 3 years ago. I think people just got tired of waiting and waiting for the new OS to come-out. Furthermore, as any real computer geek will tell you (or ask you), do you really want to be the one that beta tests MicroSoft's new operating system? I'll wait a yearr until Vista version 1.5.1 comes-out with all the problems solved. Nick http://www.CreditManagementWorld.com

  • 8 Posted by dans.chat on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    Im glad to see that Vista did not make it. I am a beta tester and it is worse than any os I have ever seen. Dont throw your money away on a horrible operating system like Windows Vista. Everyone I talk to about it they get told not to buy it. It will force you to buy a new pc or reinstall windows xp back on it. Don't beleive me do a google search on windows vista sucks. And for you Yahoo chatters if you get vista foreget about voice chat,Yahoo messenger will not support voice chat on vista.

  • 9 Posted by osprey1892 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    One of the bigger problems from what I understand is that if you do want a new machine and don't want a mac. You will have no choice but to be stuck with Billy Boys Vista junk as new machinbes will be crammed with it whether you like it or not. The alternative is to build your own if you can. Some older machines cannot be upgraded enough to use Billy Boys latest nightmare. So soon you will either buy knew new or go mac.

  • 10 Posted by mbrookman10 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    Buying a MAC isn't without it's problems as well... trust me I've been using that OS for a long time. What M$ hasn't figured on is they have trained the public to not buy any new OS until the first patch level comes out to fix all the bugs we will find... What is a shock (not really) that M$ has had years and years of development on this OS and I'm sure they have quality control to look over everything but still we find problems with structure (ease of use) and the underlining code. That just kills me. Vista is just priced way to high when you can run a MAC with just about all of M$ software now and with Linux being free. Yes I know nothing is really free but I've got 4 computers here at home running linux without any problems. XP SP2 and Win2003 are now stable OS's that run fine (most of the time) so I see no need to upgrade (pay more money) until Vista does something great. M$ needs to focus more on web based apps and stop overdeveloping the OS. 90% of the users that use Windows don't use 90% of the OS capabilities anyway. Google is building apps that you use on the web like all Office software so one day the OS isn't going to matter what you use just a browser and a web link.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment