Wed Sep 6, 2006 6:46AM EDT
See Comments (132)
Much has been said about how ungodly expensive Windows Vista is going to be, but what is it really worth? While software is rarely priced based on what it actually does, I figured I'd take a unique approach toward figuring out the real value of Vista, with a feature-by-feature analysis of how much the upgrades are worth to the user. Are there other ways to get the same features? How much do alternatives cost? Here's my blow by blow analysis of Vista's new features and what they're really worth:
The final tally: $133.
Ironically, that sounds just about right. I mean, I'd totally pay $133 for Vista. I might even pay $199 so Microsoft could have $66 in mad money or to give its programmers a little vacation. Unfortunately, to get all of these features, you'll need to fork over $400 for Vista Ultimate Edition, a full three times what the OS is really worth. Better news: The upgrade is $260 (not $360 as previously reported), which puts us a little more in the ballpark, but still twice what it's really worth.
But that's just my analysis. You'll probably put your own values on certain core features of Vista that are different than mine. I'm sure parental controls are worth more to some, for example. I wouldn't be surprised if some of you value all of these upgrades at zero.
So what's your Vista value? Post it in the comments and let's see what it's really worth to you!
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I would definetly pay $260 for the upgrade because thats once every 5 years. Whereas in the flip side Mac comes out with a new version every year whic is about $150 every time so in five years Mac costs $750 $440 more than Windows think about it people.
I'll give $30 for Aero because I absolutely love the interface. However, most of the remaining fluff is absolutely worthless to me. Windows Security Features...that's about $5, but if you're like me and hate IE (I use Firefox and Opera in tandem) I don't see how worthwhile they really are. Now, I will subtract $15 for the DRM because I hate DRM. My Vista Value: $20. Would I buy it for that much? I would derive more satisfaction in taking 20 $1 bills and tossing them one-by-one into a fireplace, knowing that Microsoft won't get my money.
I feel that Microsoft should take in consideration that most of their user are students or parents of students whom is trying their best to give their sons/daughters the best tools for learning in today's computer world. It would not hurt Microsoft to make the upgrades $100 for us. I, myself, have about every Microsoft software available for my son education, but I feel like Microsoft will be raping me by asking more than $100 to continue upgrading my son software so he can stay up to date for his college years. Microsoft, please remember that most of your buyers are middle class workers or providers.
I'll pay $10 because linux has introduced some of this features a long time ago.
I'd rather move to a *nix OS than pay for $300 for Vista (or $260 for the upgrade) simply because Windows is just trying to compete with Linux OS these days, and the only way they're winning is with compatibility (but WINE has done a good job so far, and it just keeps on getting better) and games. I for one am not a Gamer, so I benefit from using Redhat, the only reason I use Windows still is for 3ds Max 7 (3d modelling program) which is windows-only. Everything else I use runs on Linux better than Windows.
I did my own look at all of Vista's new features, and all I have to say to Microsoft is: "You want me to pay $400 for what I could already get for XP or another OS in either standard features or free plug-in software?"
Yes, I will pay $260.00 for the Mid price point Vista, and a second copy for the wife. I may just wait till vista sp1 comes out.
I've had a Mac for years and years, and have skipped upgrades to the OS when I didn't think they were worth the cost. Sounds like a lot of people on the Windows side of the house (including my wife) will be doing the same thing.
I don't understand why you said that "nearly every website on earth looks broken when rendered by IE7". Have you tried IE7 Release Candidate 1? I never saw any broken web pages, even with the Beta versions. Maybe you need to try it again before you bad mouth it. It could be the "expert", not the "product".
1 Posted by jimmy_neutron_eden on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse
I think the new windows worth it becouse I 'v see on TV how the Windows Vista is working it really amazing so I think 200$ will be good for me:D Becouse I think they need to win some money at least see ya