Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:49PM EDT
See Comments (22)
File under barely-substantiated rumor: Apple may be working already on a cheaper version of the iPhone, addressing the #1 complaint that users considering purchasing the device have voiced so far.
At $499 to $599 (plus service fees), the iPhone isn't cheap. American Technology Research analyst Shaw Wu says that Apple recognizes this and is reacting to the market, just as it did when it rolled out the iPod Mini/Nano and iPod Shuffle products, filling a need for consumers who don't need all the bells and whistles of the full-blown iPhone.
On the other hand, bells and whistles are what the iPhone is all about. Do consumers really want a phone with a fancy interface that doesn't do all the cool stuff the first-generation iPhone is designed to do? Say, strip out web browsing, cut storage space down to 1GB, and remove the camera? Trimming out many of the other elements of the iPhone's operating system (like, say, its voice mail system) won't really reduce the cost of the phone, since Apple developed and already owns those components. It just doesn't save money by eliminating them.
The more I think about it, the more I have trouble finding things in iPhone that Apple could easily cut. In fact, the market on the whole has already been clamoring for Apple to address iPhone's shortcomings (lack of 3G service and instant messaging and an non-replaceable battery, namely) and add more features, not less. Will people really thrill over a bare-bones iPhone that still costs $399? What Apple needs to do is just cut the price across the board if it really wants to get people slobbering over the thing, instead of just the tech elite.
What's the magic price point for iPhone as far as you're concerned?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
300 dollars max...
people will still buy this...no matter what it costs, just like the playstation 3 that sold for thousands of dollars...
$199.00 top bid.
$299, but they need to add a memory slot first.
I could care less about the price. Unless they release a SDK for it that allows me to write a program that can use Bluetooth, or release a Java JVM that uses JSR-82 that people can publicly write programs for, the iPhone is nothing but an expensive brick. I also wouldnt buy it if they stripped out what makes the iPhone the iPhone. It wouldnt be the same. The iPhone as it is has the bare minimum of what I would want in a cellphone.
leave it alone .You get what you pay for. I really want and can not wait to buy one .It does just about everything you want or need. If some one some thing cheaper go some place else. Volkswagen or Rolls
memory slot? whats the point? keep at LEAST a 4 gig drive in it... the battery is a problem however...., but the Razr has crappy battery life too.... people will still buy, (my mom is one of them) but i abuse my cell phone, so i have a strippy model nokia, a 5th g 30 gig i pod, and a nice digital camera.... and i surf the web at home.... and i am happy with that
My wife and I bought Blackjacks ($72 at Sam's Club with contract extension) last week upon final release of the ridiculous $500-600 iPhone price tag. I am interested in the phone, but give it a year and prices will fall just as they did on iPod. The "brick" 1st gen iPod was $499, and my newest nano was $149 (same memory size too.) All of us know someone who bought the Xbox 360 or PS3 on Ebay for $1000, but the majority will wait for sane prices.
Why should I pay a dime of $149.99? And with NO memory slot and no user replaceable battery? Surely you jest.
1 Posted by kennernow on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:49PM EDT Report Abuse
Frankly, is anyone surprised??