Why New Music Doesn't Sound As Good As It Did

Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:17PM EDT

See Comments (521)

Never mind that today's factory-produced starlets and mini-clones just don't have the practiced chops of the supergroups of yesteryear, pop in a new CD and you might notice that the quality of the music itself—maybe something as simple as a snare drum hit—just doesn't sound as crisp and as clear as you're used to. Why is that?

It's part of the music industry's quest to make music louder and louder, and it's been going on for decades, at least since the birth of the compact disc. Click the link for a nice little video, a mere 2 minutes long, which explains it in detail, with audio cues that you'll be able to hear in crisp detail.

The key to the problem is that, in making the soft parts of a track louder (in the process making the entire track loud), you lose detail in the song: The difference between what's supposed to be loud and what's supposed to be soft becomes less and less. The result is that, sure, the soft parts of a song are nice and loud, but big noises like drum beats become muffled and fuzzy. But consumers often subconsciously equate loudness with quality, and thus, record producers pump up the volume. Anything to make a buck.

The bigger problem is that this is all unnecessary. Stereo equipment is more powerful today than ever, and last time I checked, every piece of music hardware had a volume knob.

Don't take my word for it: Pop in the first CD you bought and play it at the same volume level as the most recent one you bought. You might be shocked by what you hear. 

Anyone still wondering why the music business is suffering? 

LINK: The Loudness War 

Comments on Why New Music Doesn't Sound As Good As It Did

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by jimmcdee on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    Here's another factor: years ago, if you cranked the volume up to max, the sound distortion became unbearable. If that didn't bother you someone else within earshot would tell you to "turn that racket down" (usually in less polite terms). Today's speakers can handle the volume which catches kids in a vicious circle. As they ride around in their cars listening to music at ear------ tering volumes, their own ears become incrfeasingly ----- tered until their hearing is more and more (and permanently) damaged which requires them to turn the volume up more and more which in turn encourages producers to pump out louder and louder "music" at the expense of subtilies like musical expression, crescendos and dimuendoes ... are we heading towards a world where the three most important musical criterias are volume, volume and voleme?

  • 2 Posted by m_knopp on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    "Anyone still wondering why the music business is suffering?" Yeah, the so called professionals running the music business. Between alienating their customers through paying of our government to pass draconian laws which subvert the intent of the founding law, and then suing kids for downloading music, and their utter inability to understand that the world is changing they still want to blame piracy for their downfall rather then their own ineptitude.

  • 3 Posted by seamusfurr on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    It's also a ----- to make mix CDs/playlists of older music and newer music, since the volume differentials are so great.

  • 4 Posted by nimbylive on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    I can still remember the first time I bought a led zep cd. I always wondered why it was so quiet. I mean I could barely hear it until I turned the volume way up.

  • 5 Posted by fashionablydave on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    But not all new artists are shoving up the volume. Between the new and old Dresden Dolls album, you can hear quite a difference, and the endearing factor of the old one are it's subtleties. Bjork has begun focusing on 5.1 support and much more subtle sounds with her last 3 albums. Even someone like Venetian Snares, whom you would expect to just go louder and louder, has gone from monotone single-layered untz untz beats to delicate multi-layered cakes of sounds.

  • 6 Posted by darksol360 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    Listen to the jazz group "The Bad Plus" not over produced and perfectly utilizes the dynamics of, truly, soft and loud.

  • 7 Posted by gr_vaughan on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    CDs just don't sound as good as vinyl, although they're certainly more convenient and don't have the pops, etc. I'm surprised about the raised volume levels on CDs - I thought one of their big strengths was improved dynamics, which seems to have helped in a resurgence of the popularity of classical music. Even with old music, most of the CDs I've bought in recent years have been remixed, and seem to have lower sound quality. In particular, the volume levels of the vocalists seem to almost drown out the instruments.

  • 8 Posted by stanleyaston on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    Not just the volume. I've noticed a definite loss of separation in the the newer music.

  • 9 Posted by johnpolston on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    Actually you are close but a little off track. The record companies actually know what they are doing. They aren't doing it to make them seem to sound better, they are actually over-driving the tracks to make encoded/ripped mp3 copies of the CD-tracks sound like totally over-driven crap. I've been looking for someone to post an inquiry into this for years now and this is the first I have seen it brought up. I have asked the question many times on different forums if anyone has figured out a fool-proof way to keep the encoded versions from sounding over-driven with not much luck other than utilizing an encoder that enables normalization factors which works most of the time but not all. There are still a few niche record companies like Telarc that use the latest techniques and technologies to produce as close to perfect sounding CD's, SACD's etc. for the audiophiles that appreciate the quality even more so than the subject. I would much rather listen to a high-quality SACD of a not-so-favorite genre or artist than listen to a bad recording of a favored artist. I'm actually listening to a hybrid-SACD of Rachmaninoff Symp. #2 by Telarc 2007 while I am writing this and it sounds great.

  • 10 Posted by baron_murray on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    It's pretty sad when I could run the music biz better than the "so-called" professionals and should even turn a profit!

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment