Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:53PM EDT
See Comments (1)
Color me surprised: I was shocked to hear that one of the world's largest ISPs has never had a chief privacy officer, a staple at many high-tech companies and something that AOL needs, considering its long history of privacy gaffes. Heck, even Microsoft has a privacy officer.
Well at least it's doing something about it: In response to the release of 650,000 user records recently, the company is undergoing a massive reorganization (and disbanding the unit responsible for releasing the user information) and naming a privacy officer. No date has been set aside from "soon."
This is good news for AOL users but probably a bit too late to stem the flood of users abandoning the once-pioneering ISP, despite its recent plan to become free for broadband users. (Though in all fairness, AOL has seen a slight jump in subscribers after it launched the free service.)
But maybe I'm wrong. Is AOL on an upswing? Anyone's opinion of the company turning up?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
1 Posted by shutrbug@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:21PM EDT Report Abuse
AOL needs a Chief Privacy Officer badly. I signed up for an Xdrive account (owned by AOL) and shared some photos that I uploaded to my Xdrive with some friends. The email that was sent had my password appended to my AOL screen name! I can't believe that they're so lax with security. Actually, I guess I can... they're AOL.