Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:19PM EDT
See Comments (313)
Reader John Coggins recently emailed me wondering whether it was time to upgrade his seven-year-old PC, even though it's working fine. That got me thinking about this post. All things considered... when should you upgrade your computer? Here are some rules of thumb to keep in mind.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Hi Chris, I think you missed a very important point. The law of the need for a new computer is directly determined by the age of the user. I've owned three computers previously in the same time frame of the one I use now. Do you remember the good old days when RAM hit 100megs, and could you believe that internal storage would ever go to a gig? And what about those cheap $5000 cutting edge machines? Now I limp along with my 6 y/o Dell, with the old versions of software and I'm quite contented. My situation must be a "Law" after all, it can't be because I am getting older. Kids these days jumping on the Vista band wagon never lived through Windows ME and Windows 2000. Wait until they are my age.....I think of all the money I wasted upgrading. I could have been smoking, drinking and chasing women instead of staying up all night installing software. Now I am too old to do either.
Dead components and gaming are the only reasons why I upgrade. Quite frankly, if the LCD backlights and hard drives did not fail, I wouldnt bother to upgrade unless the game I was playing couldnt run anymore on the machine. I get really annoyed when people say to me "oh your machine is 2 years old - you should have bought a new one already". Yeah - give me the cash and I'll go do it right now - wanna buy my $25k worth of software to put on that machine too since I cant transfer the licenses?
From a gamer's perspective, I would say make sure your new game cannot run on your exiting PC before upgrading. I have a 5 year old, self built rig, upgraded 2 years ago for (the then) latest gen. video card and max ram. It is at its max upgrade cabability. It ran BF2 at medium settings without a hitch. With the advent of Quake Wars and World in Conflict I figured I'd to buy the Null recommended $4K rig but surprisingly my rig can still run Quake at medium low settings and WIC at high medium settings! That leaves more dough to sample the booze recommended on another "unrelated" blog ;)
I have an Amstrad 6128 green screen attached to a Brother electronic typewriter. I run Tasword and know it like my hand. This system handled all my school tests, all my correspondence and a large recipe file which I will print from for anybody who wants. There is never a problem with virus or spam. The only problem is that it will not talk to anybody directly. What I'm writing on now is my retirement gift from many fine people. I don't know "Word" at all; I use Tasword. Opinions of the new world: e-mail is neat, but I don't do anything really important with it. NYTimes Headlines for free every day with dictionary (+ pronunciation) is amazing. Wikipedia is cool and I've learned a lot about opera - Potts and Pavarotti - on YouTube. Now a year on I have the distinct impression that nobody understands or uses it all. There's just too much. I wonder what they will say about this era in 25 years. Very unsettled/ing. Ad for highest quality German carbon steel kitchen knives, "The only knives your grandchildren will ever need." I say keep your games and e-mails, but remember your knives. Amen.
i think we should buy a new pc every 5 years. upgrading component is expensive because manufacture will not be produce old pc components. for example, a sd ram is far more expensive than ddr ram.
I agree with k3nt91, i sell/fix computers for a retail company, i usually tell people that if the computer is more then 4-5 yrs old and the repair costs cost more then 250ish then it is worth it to just buy a new computer, most lower end computer start at around 300-350ish and yes its lower end but it also is much better then what a 4-5 yr old computer is. but if your computer works fine then good use it till it breaks, i had a new unit (nVidia sli 68-i, 4gbs ddr2, Intel dual core e6400, twin 880gts VGC, 500gb HDD, etc etc, i sold it cause i needed the money to pay for school) i went back to my hp from 2004 (Intel p4 w/HT, 2gb DDR, 250 HDD, don't have a VGC YET) and you know what it works fine for what i use it for. but of course if you are a gamer (which i WAS) you need the best gear on the market just to be able to play ALLOT of the "new" games... well all i say is good luck too all the old computer owners cuz parts get VERY expensive (on a side note, vista works great don't be afraid to use it, just take your time cause most people lose patience thats why people don't like it)
I have a p4 2.8 with 1.5 mg of ram running windows xp pro. I was also thinking about upgrading it. Come to find out it would be cheaper just to buy a new pc. I couldn't believe what they charge for a p4 3.8 cpu if you could even find one. I was quoted around 4 or 5 hundred dollars. I just hope i can get to use my own copy of xp pro. I'm in no hurry to use vista.
I'm tired of yahoo articles that, on the homepage, purport to be one thing, and then when you get to the article, they are not - whoever edits the main page ought to be fired
This article was ridiculously simplistic. Are your applications running slower than they used to? Gee, then maybe you should get a new computer. Get real, if you're going to set yourself up as an expert then give expert advice!
1 Posted by wo1936 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse
i have an E MACHINE PAID OVER $600.00 16 mo. ago & it died.needs a power supply & a cpu & possibly a mother. i decided not to fix it. this was the second one i bought.so i decided to buy an Acer i was told by a repair shop that it is the best on the market. i will see!