When Is It Time To Get a New PC?

Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:19PM EDT

See Comments (313)

Reader John Coggins recently emailed me wondering whether it was time to upgrade his seven-year-old PC, even though it's working fine. That got me thinking about this post. All things considered... when should you upgrade your computer? Here are some rules of thumb to keep in mind.

  • Dead Components - Eventually your hard drive, optical drive, power supply, or motherboard will fail. These events can range from minor annoyances to catastrophic disasters, but depending on the age of the computer, any of them could be cause for upgrading to a new machine. Consider the power supply. Old, cheap power supplies are frequent failure points, and new supplies often don't fit in old cases and/or don't have the right connectors to work with old motherboards. You can hunt down compatible equipment and adapter cables, but even then it can be dicey installing it. Last time I upgraded an ancient computer's power supply I had to drill new holes in the case to line up the mounting screws properly. At some point, you might just say it's not worth the trouble and that it's time to dump the old PC and get a new one. On the other hand, motherboard meltdowns are usually so severe and expensive to repair that a new PC is in order right away.
  • New Software - Whether you should upgrade to Vista is a wholly separate discussion, but if you really want to run it, you're not going to be doing so on seven year-old hardware. When a new OS rolls around, you'll usually find online advisors that can evaluate whether your old PC is up to the task or whether you need an upgrade. You'll find the Vista Upgrade Advisor here. This is also good to think about if you are upgrading a major piece of software that you frequently use. If you find it runs very slowly on your old PC, it may be time for a new one (or at least some more RAM).
  • Valuing Your Time - Even with RAM upgrades and other internal tweaks, there's only so far you can upgrade any PC before maxing out its capabilities. And over time it will run slower and slower, especially as software (see above) gets larger and larger. If you find yourself launching applications, then wandering off to do something else while they finish loading, it's probably time for a new computer.
  • Compatibility - Newish features like Firewire and USB aren't available on old PCs. Not a problem if your parallel port printer is still running, but what happens when it croaks? You might need a new PC just to be compatible with peripherals you need (though add-in cards can be a stopgap measure). Ditto for software: An old operating system like Windows 98 or 2000 won't run most newly released titles.
  • Gaming - This almost goes without saying, but most gamers upgrade to new hardware every one or two years, simply to keep up with the extreme demands that the latest games place on their computers.

The bottom line: If you are using your PC for basic needs and it is serving you well, there is no reason to upgrade it just because it's getting old, unless you simply want to see what you're missing. With regular maintenance (particularly dusting inside the case), it should survive for a long while: 10, 15, even 20 years is not unheard of, though their utility dramatically diminishes after 10 years. That said, your risk of hardware failure increases as time wears on, as moving parts wear down and solder starts to become brittle and loose. Make sure your backups are up to date, no matter how young your computer might be.

Comments on When Is It Time To Get a New PC?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by wo1936 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    i have an E MACHINE PAID OVER $600.00 16 mo. ago & it died.needs a power supply & a cpu & possibly a mother. i decided not to fix it. this was the second one i bought.so i decided to buy an Acer i was told by a repair shop that it is the best on the market. i will see!

  • 2 Posted by ranjobe on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hi Chris, I think you missed a very important point. The law of the need for a new computer is directly determined by the age of the user. I've owned three computers previously in the same time frame of the one I use now. Do you remember the good old days when RAM hit 100megs, and could you believe that internal storage would ever go to a gig? And what about those cheap $5000 cutting edge machines? Now I limp along with my 6 y/o Dell, with the old versions of software and I'm quite contented. My situation must be a "Law" after all, it can't be because I am getting older. Kids these days jumping on the Vista band wagon never lived through Windows ME and Windows 2000. Wait until they are my age.....I think of all the money I wasted upgrading. I could have been smoking, drinking and chasing women instead of staying up all night installing software. Now I am too old to do either.

  • 3 Posted by rogueist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    Dead components and gaming are the only reasons why I upgrade. Quite frankly, if the LCD backlights and hard drives did not fail, I wouldnt bother to upgrade unless the game I was playing couldnt run anymore on the machine. I get really annoyed when people say to me "oh your machine is 2 years old - you should have bought a new one already". Yeah - give me the cash and I'll go do it right now - wanna buy my $25k worth of software to put on that machine too since I cant transfer the licenses?

  • 4 Posted by jairaj on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    From a gamer's perspective, I would say make sure your new game cannot run on your exiting PC before upgrading. I have a 5 year old, self built rig, upgraded 2 years ago for (the then) latest gen. video card and max ram. It is at its max upgrade cabability. It ran BF2 at medium settings without a hitch. With the advent of Quake Wars and World in Conflict I figured I'd to buy the Null recommended $4K rig but surprisingly my rig can still run Quake at medium low settings and WIC at high medium settings! That leaves more dough to sample the booze recommended on another "unrelated" blog ;)

  • 5 Posted by mbash1944 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have an Amstrad 6128 green screen attached to a Brother electronic typewriter. I run Tasword and know it like my hand. This system handled all my school tests, all my correspondence and a large recipe file which I will print from for anybody who wants. There is never a problem with virus or spam. The only problem is that it will not talk to anybody directly. What I'm writing on now is my retirement gift from many fine people. I don't know "Word" at all; I use Tasword. Opinions of the new world: e-mail is neat, but I don't do anything really important with it. NYTimes Headlines for free every day with dictionary (+ pronunciation) is amazing. Wikipedia is cool and I've learned a lot about opera - Potts and Pavarotti - on YouTube. Now a year on I have the distinct impression that nobody understands or uses it all. There's just too much. I wonder what they will say about this era in 25 years. Very unsettled/ing. Ad for highest quality German carbon steel kitchen knives, "The only knives your grandchildren will ever need." I say keep your games and e-mails, but remember your knives. Amen.

  • 6 Posted by k3nt91 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    i think we should buy a new pc every 5 years. upgrading component is expensive because manufacture will not be produce old pc components. for example, a sd ram is far more expensive than ddr ram.

  • 7 Posted by ericvd22783 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree with k3nt91, i sell/fix computers for a retail company, i usually tell people that if the computer is more then 4-5 yrs old and the repair costs cost more then 250ish then it is worth it to just buy a new computer, most lower end computer start at around 300-350ish and yes its lower end but it also is much better then what a 4-5 yr old computer is. but if your computer works fine then good use it till it breaks, i had a new unit (nVidia sli 68-i, 4gbs ddr2, Intel dual core e6400, twin 880gts VGC, 500gb HDD, etc etc, i sold it cause i needed the money to pay for school) i went back to my hp from 2004 (Intel p4 w/HT, 2gb DDR, 250 HDD, don't have a VGC YET) and you know what it works fine for what i use it for. but of course if you are a gamer (which i WAS) you need the best gear on the market just to be able to play ALLOT of the "new" games... well all i say is good luck too all the old computer owners cuz parts get VERY expensive (on a side note, vista works great don't be afraid to use it, just take your time cause most people lose patience thats why people don't like it)

  • 8 Posted by wmtyrancz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a p4 2.8 with 1.5 mg of ram running windows xp pro. I was also thinking about upgrading it. Come to find out it would be cheaper just to buy a new pc. I couldn't believe what they charge for a p4 3.8 cpu if you could even find one. I was quoted around 4 or 5 hundred dollars. I just hope i can get to use my own copy of xp pro. I'm in no hurry to use vista.

  • 9 Posted by judithmikesch on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm tired of yahoo articles that, on the homepage, purport to be one thing, and then when you get to the article, they are not - whoever edits the main page ought to be fired

  • 10 Posted by rmammola on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    This article was ridiculously simplistic. Are your applications running slower than they used to? Gee, then maybe you should get a new computer. Get real, if you're going to set yourself up as an expert then give expert advice!

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment