Windows Vista Service Pack 1: No Performance Boost

Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:46AM EST

See Comments (24)

The first testing reports are in: Windows Vista's Service Pack 1 is unlikely to offer any improvement in performance, one of users' biggest complaints about the new OS, over the version of Vista you have already.

Benchmarks were performed by exo.performance.network under a variety of scenarios, using the latest beta of SP1 (which was recently made available to a wide assortment of testers). The results are largely unimpressive: With general productivity applications Vista SP1 showed a slight (2 percent) performance drop vs. out-of-the-box Vista or a statistically insignificant difference. The results were about the same for database applications, too (see chart above): SP1 offers no improvement, but it doesn't really hurt, either.

Though it's not the speed boon we'd been hoping for, it's important to remember that Windows Service Packs rarely improve performance at all. In fact, when Windows XP Service Pack 2 was released, most systems saw a substantial performance drop (my tests at the time pegged it at an average of 9 percent). But SP2's many improvements to OS stability and added features like the Windows Firewall easily made it a must-have addition. That's the same hope here, that while Vista SP1 may not make your computer scream (the study authors note that it is Vista's architecture that makes it so slow, and no amount of fine-tuning is going to fix that), at least it might remedy some of the (numerous) other annoyances about Vista.

LINK: Vista SP1 a Performance Dud

Comments on Windows Vista Service Pack 1: No Performance Boost

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by gtmiller5337@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    Bottom line-Software launch for monetary gain-All bells and whistles no substance. Petition MS to extend support of XP-Pro and call it a day. Quit stong arming the consumer with software that is not compatible with customers needs.

  • 2 Posted by paradude2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    Good riddance Windows!Our family has converted all 4 of our PC's to a Linux based OS and we haven't looked back.... wouldn't go back to Windows if you payed me.

  • 4 Posted by m_knopp on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    And yet another YAWN! from Microsoft. So, when does Wal-Mart get more of those $200 Everex computers in? They may run Linux but they also include OpenOffice and all of the Google apps that 90% of us need. I am not sure how Microsoft is going to compete with a complete computer setup that cost less then their OS and office suite alone. I guess there are always gamers, but aren't they supposed to buy the XBox?

  • 5 Posted by ger_i_atric on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    Let me see if I understand all of this... Take several years of Beta testing, several delays in the release date, put out a product that has compatibility issues with existing software, and to top it all off, create a service pack that takes another 2% performance drop from an already slow OS. Yeppers, makes me want to run right out and buy it. Cuz it shur looks mighty purty.

  • 6 Posted by rosesisland2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    No one likes change, and, change is hard. I like it. Yes, it takes some getting used to, but, hey you want to go back to DOS?

  • 8 Posted by twalro on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    Rosesisland, I don't think anyone wants to go back to DOS. What we want is an operating system that isn't buggy, isn't totally insecure, doesn't require hardware that is an order of mangnitude more powerful just to run it and and works with standard PC hardware out of the box, pretty much everything that Vista isn't.

  • 10 Posted by gagfilms on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    All the more reason to switch to Apple!

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment