House of Reps Votes for Broad Wi-Fi Restrictions in the Name of Porn

Thu Dec 6, 2007 11:33PM EST

See Comments (14)

It's hard to fathom how severe the fallout of the SAFE Act could end up being, but if the House of Representives has its way, SAFE could be on the fast track to becoming the law of the land. In a vote of 409 to 2, the House overwhelmingly voted for the legislation, sending it now to the Senate.

What's SAFE? It stands for the Securing Adolescents From Exploitation-Online Act, and its reach could be unprecedented. Namely, it holds that anyone offering any public electronic communications service (including an open Wi-Fi connection or internet kiosk) must create a sort of dossier on anyone they suspect might be viewing child pornography over their network and submit it to the government. (Presumably the culprit would have to be caught in the act; the bill doesn't really say.) The service provider will also have to maintain an archive of all the suspect's files for use as evidence.

It sounds bad at first, but the definition of child pornography in this case is especially surprising. Per Cnet's Declan McCullagh, the definition of such images include those featuring fully clothed children in "lascivious" poses and even drawings of such obscenity. (That would include the popular form of hentai anime.)

Failure to comply could result in a first-offense fine of $150,000 and $300,000 after that. That means every library, coffee shop, and even private homes that offer open wireless access could face crushing penalties if they don't eavesdrop on their clientele. In other words: The government wants you to do its dirty work and play Big Brother on its behalf. Creepy.

Additionally scary: This legislation never received a committee vote or public hearing and was never made available for public review. Way to sneak one past the goalie, Congress!

UPDATE: Ars Technica writes that the bill may not be intended to have such broad consequences as discussed in the Cnet story... but even the bill's introducer isn't entirely sure. 

LINK: House vote on illegal images sweeps in Wi-Fi, Web sites

Comments on House of Reps Votes for Broad Wi-Fi Restrictions in the Name of Porn

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by hanaseba.wakaru on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    While I don't like the idea of politicians sneaking through these sorts of restrictions, I also have to wonder what kind of person views those types of material in a public place. I also worry that a pop-up or mistakenly opened email might land me on some government pedophile watch list.

  • 2 Posted by maleman14001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    Basically that happen to me with a mistaken opening of a web site. To my horror it didn't even take a child to see it was a child porn site once it was opened. I immediately remove the intruder but to this day still wonder if it still lingers hidden someplace on my PC. So even if my PC ever needs a repair I'll opt to just replace it to make sure some repair person doesn't turn me in for "viewing" child porn. This happen several years ago and to this day it still makes me wonder if my PC is still infected with that site.

  • 3 Posted by muscogeekid on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    Commie ----- s!!! Freedom is a lost thing for Americans. We should vote out every single representative who supported this stupid bill.

  • 5 Posted by pjb1671 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    Oh My God! Will government soon be telling us which TV shows have too much sex and nudity for us to watch? Will making snow angels be outlawed becase some religions don't believe in angels? Wll Sesame Street be taken off Public Television because Bert and Ernie share a room? When did our Government become so obnoxious?

  • 6 Posted by j_alexfleury on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    PJB our government became that obnoxious a long time ago, but nobody is paying attention And what will this do to stop child porn? How many pedophiles go out in public to view their obsession?

  • 7 Posted by rogueist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    Whoever introduced this and whoever voted for this needs to be voted out of office ASAP. This should never have passed.

  • 8 Posted by davidbdr on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    I propose a "Protection From Congress" bill. Laws already exist against child porn. These congressional bozos always try to legislate thought under the guise of protecting children. It's a safe cover since it is political a bad move to oppose such b.s.

  • 9 Posted by somebodys_here on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is why I don't like living in the states. Government interference in everyday life is getting (if not already) completely out of hand. I'm sick of this crap.

  • 10 Posted by wq1972 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is ridiculous. If the government so cares for this, why does not the government ban those porn sites, especially child porn site?

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment