Blu-ray vs. HD DVD Hits Fever Pitch

Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:52AM EST

See Comments (15)

Every week seems to bring yet another price cut in the high-def DVD world. Late November brought us $99 HD DVD players (which quickly flew off the shelves), and now Blu-ray has dipped below the $300 mark, with one Samsung unit (pictured) selling for a mere $270 at Amazon, $230 off its $500 list price. Can a full-on battle for $199, often considered the "magic number" for consumer electronics, be far behind?

Hardware price drops are only part of the equation, as the studios are pulling no punches in this increasingly expensive battle: Some reports theorize that Warner Brothers may be dropping HD DVD support come January, while speculation continues as to whether Microsoft will integrate HD DVD into a forthcoming Xbox 360 (something it is utterly foolish not to have done with the 360 Elite). Dual-format players continue to arrive, but they simply make no sense: All of them cost far more than buying one of each type of stand-alone player.

But as Ars Technica notes, Joe Average is by and large still sitting this war out, unwilling to pick sides until a winner has been crowned and a single standard chosen. (I know I am.) What's rarely said is that it's not just a question of buying one new DVD player and some discs. I've got four optical disc players connected to TVs throughout my house, plus a portable DVD player for the kids and a half-dozen computers, each with a DVD drive. Upgrading everything to one format or the other would run into the thousands of dollars. What if I pick wrong?

Sure, I probably have more media requirements than other households, but think about your own circumstance. Siding with one format probably doesn't just mean ditching the single, lonely box in the living room... and that's why this war and its stakes are getting hotter than ever.

LINK: Blu-ray vs. HD DVD battle heats up as Christmas approaches 

Comments on Blu-ray vs. HD DVD Hits Fever Pitch

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by powerbysun on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    Even though Blu-ray is more expensive now, I will only support them because of the extra scratch resistant layer on it. After saying that I neither own nor will buy a new player for awhile. The price of Blu-ray will have fallen to

  • 2 Posted by tkelley004 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yep, I am sitting on the sidelines and will upgrade to the winner.

  • 3 Posted by muscogeekid on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    Chris, you are absolutely right on this. It just makes no sense for the average user to invest in either format, or both, just to see one of them completely dissolve. Unless you're under 40, you still have the scars of the VHS/Beta war. It's just a shame that businesses are repeating that same nonsense.

  • 4 Posted by thanasispaschalis on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    I' ve already experienced this kind of war before with SACD vs. DVD-Audio. Neither format won though there are hints that the SACD has survived while DVD-Audio is dead. I am bying SACD discs now since I consider myself to be an audiophile and I truly see that particular format as a serious step up from the CD-DA. Now, as far as the Video Wars is concerned, I am certainly backing the HD-DVD since it has many more options like interactivity and added value content while it's easier to use. It usually looks better too (I have experienced both formats in a head to head video test). I will wait though until an HD-DVD/Blu-Ray drive becomes available for my PC. I want to build an Entertainment PC for my living-room and if a combo drive was available it would certainly make it to my wishlist. I won't choose between either. Not now anywayz

  • 5 Posted by keithshults on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    There was enough trouble switching from VHS to DVD, but most of my technology (from video game systems to laptops to just simple dvd players) depends on the ability to play dvds. A switch to BluRay would come to an expense that, as a college student, there's no way I could afford. Personsally, I'm just fine sticking with dvds.

  • 8 Posted by m_knopp on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    Two aspects which I think get overlooked so often in articles like this is the established market of HDTVs in the average Joe's house and the price of the media. In my close family (cousins, aunts & uncles, and such) only two out of twelve families has an HDTV in the house. So none of them care about an HD-DVD player even less so about Blu-Ray versus HD-DVD. Of the two that do have HDTVs one has a PS3 and the other up samples his DVD collection. The other aspect which makes a difference is the price of the movies. When I look at movies, I can buy the Pirates of the Caribbean 3 DVD for $15 yet in Blu-Ray it cost $23. For Shrek 3 the DVD cost $14 yet in HD-DVD it cost $28. Blu-Ray disc are generally cheaper then HD-DVD and that can be a big difference over a standard movie library which can easily be in the hundreds of titles. Of course both high definition formats are nearly twice what I can buy a standard DVD for and upsample it. Which doesn't require me to rebuy my library which I have been building over the last half decade.

  • 9 Posted by evenbetternb on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    Now is a good time to buy a PS3 and get into the Blu-Ray camp. Movie rentals are more readily available (from Blockbuster, where I already have an account). The movies that I'm interested in are available on Blu-Ray, and some will NEVER be available on HD-DVD (keep in mind that Sony owns a movie studio now). It doesn't make much sense to buy movies until the format war shakes out, so I'll be content to rent. The cheapest HD-DVD players only support 1080i resolution, not the 1080p that my new HDTV supports (and PS3 supports). Also, I'll be able to play my old PlayStation games again (and newer High-def PS3 games as well). The older PlayStation games will also look much better in HD! The PlayStation 3 firmware updates will permit future developments in the Blu-Ray format to work on my player. OTOH, cheap HD-DVD players will become obsolete as more advanced features are developed. The way I see it, if I'm wrong about HD-DVD, the players will have dropped to $50 by the time I need to buy one (and the price of HD-DVD movies will have fallen as well). Also, when the $150 million bribe runs out (at the end of next year), Paramount will be returning to Blu-Ray. Had it not been for that bribe (to dump Blu-Ray support), HD-DVD might already be dead. Only Universal was exclusively in their camp. All other studios were supporting Blu-Ray or both formats. The good news is that when the format war is over, many TV shows will be re-released in High-Def, since they were originally recorded on film. P.S. I was in the VHS camp in the '80s, so I have a track record of picking the winners in the format wars. VHS won because of rentals and the ability to record 8 hours on one tape, when Betamax could only record 4 hours. Sony has learned from their past mistakes. You will find that recordable Blu-Ray discs have more capacity than recordable HD-DVD discs.

  • 10 Posted by rogueist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    According to the specs for the new Xbox releases for next year, they contain HD drives in them. As far as sales of raw units go, HD players are outselling BlueRay players in this area at least by a margin of 4 to 1. I am telling you, its the name. The kids have the BlueRay stuff, but the adults have the HD.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment