Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:51AM EST
See Comments (35)
Wow, talk about a sea change. Last time I saw these statistics (about two years ago), only about 5 percent of the United States had dumped its landline telephone altogether in favor of going cell-phone-only. Today, that number has jumped to 13.6 percent, or about one in eight households cutting the cord for good.
Oddly, these stats come from the National Health Interview Survey, conducted earlier this year, which offered such weird observations as the fact that those without a landline were more likely to be smokers and were twice as likely to be "binge drinkers."
That likely has to do with the personality profile of the typical cord-cutter: A whopping 55 percent of adults living with "unrelated roommates" and 31 percent of adults aged 25 to 29 had no landline. In other words, college kids and single, recent graduates make up the majority of those without a wired phone. That may explain why cell-only users are twice as likely to have no health insurance while also reporting they were in "excellent to very good" health; they're simply younger.
As with many tech trends, pint-sized buyers are clearly giving this movement its legs, and it will only continue to snowball as they get older. Of people I know who ditched the landline, none has ever later changed their mind and decided to get rewired. Watch for old-school telephone carriers to get increasingly desperate as this trend continues.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
About 2 years for me. When I got a cell phone, (I have had it for about 3 or 4 years, but there was a little break in that.) After my kid got a phone, after a few months I just ditched the landline, I now pay five or ten dollars a month on my Dish Bill
I'd ditch mine, if we didn't have to have it for the ADT system :(
adt sells a cell back-up for the alarm. i know- i work for them.
I've been a cell phone user since the very first model----- the market and I also had a landline phone. I thought that paying for landline didn't make any since because my cell phone was always my primary phone. So, I cancelled my landline but after going through 911 and the blackout we (New Yorkers) suffered one summer, I found that being without phone service is really scary in times of emergency. So, I turned back on my landline and even though I hardly use just knowing that in case of most emergencies it will still be working is worth paying for the landline.
if one ditches their land mine phone, how are they going to get internet service??
I am a little confused, naive or both. I have DSL, which requires a phone line. I have a Satelite dish which requires a phone line. The home alarm thing is another problem. So I am guessing most people in this study basically use their home to crash and that's it. Students and that age group would probably convert once settling down into a "normal" life of marriage, having children, buying a home, burying themselves in debt, etc.
For pwm2460.You can now go without a landline for adt.
I'm not home much anyway - There's no point in a landline anymore.
i havent had a land line phone for 5 years and since then i have had an alarm system, cable and the internet. the only reason why you really need a land line now is because of the stupid cell phone companies charging you outrageous prices for what...nothing. charging you anywhere from 30 bucks to hundreds just because you went over the minutes...stupid!!! but i do have a family and living the "normal" life without a landline phone.
1 Posted by jirojas on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse
I had a land line as well as a cell but everybody who knew me called me on my cell anyways. The only calls I received through my land line were from telemarketers and other surveys. It got kind of annoying not to mention it was a waste of money so I discontinued it.