Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:48PM EST
See Comments (14)
It's hard to believe it's come to this, but only 1 or 2 out of 20 email messages is now not spam, according to Barracuda Networks, which offers spam filtering services and which analyzed a billion messages to arrive at that figure.
The speed with which this figure is rising is astonishing. In 2001, Barracuda says spam accounted for only 5 percent of all mail, hitting 70 percent by 2004, 80 to 85 percent by 2005, and 85 to 90 percent by 2006. While spam won't actually hit 100 percent next year, it could certainly be close. (For its part, Symantec pegs the 2007 spam figure at 71 percent, up from 56 percent last year.)
Whichever figure is right doesn't really matter: The truth is that spam is getting worse, and fast, no matter how many laws are passed outlawing the nuisance. (The linked story also notes that over half of business customers consider spam the "worst form of junk advertising" there is. My vote: Junk faxes.)
Another trend I've been seeing: Spam filters' false positives for good messages are getting worse, too, but at the same time you can't really live without the filter, can you? The takeaway: Check your spam folders regularly, and train your filter as accurately as you can to reduce false positives down the line.
LINK: Report: 95 percent of all e-mail has that spammy smell
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Free market. Costly pain.
Spam in a post about said nuisance. hehe.
Nativeraven1, it isn't so much the free market as it is the free service. For one low monthly price you can send as much email as you want, thus if a spammer sets up an automated system which shoots our one hundred or one billion spam emails there is no extra cost. Now, if only 0.01% of those emails nets him some money then he is going to up the flood to get more money. The only solution is to charge a fee for email, just as we do for letters so those millions of emails might cost the spammer thousands of dollars to send, but that is a terrible solution since it punishes the general user for the spammer's behavior. So here we are with 95% of all email being spam and growing.
I have only recently learned to check my junkmail for emails that have been caught by the filter! Dumb me!
It's a bugger, enough said. In this case, laws alone won't fix the situation. Enforcement of them is just as, and is, more important.
Set up manual spam filters to catch the new spams of the day, and if you can find it, use spam filtering by country - just allow the emails from the country or countries of choice. Charging for emails wont work and wont do anything but cause the people whos computers have been turned into spam zombies be the target of huge bills for sending out spam emails - and the isp's will love this because they will be making money hand over fist - the spammers dont care - they dont use their own computers or services for anything. This is all the fault of the ISPs for not allowing people to connect to their work and other email systems through their networks - by doing so they had to make it so that people could relay messages from any email address through their systems - if they had NOT done that, then everyone would have had their emails tied to the system it is supposed to be from, and no email addresses would have been spoofable. So by trying to extert their own form of micro control on the Internet, they created the entire current spam and zombie problem worldwide. Thanks ISPs for giving us this junk...
Why can't email service providers limit the amount of outgoing mail for new users? Just limit what they can send until people are established as responsible users. From the spam i get, that would seem to discourage a lot of it.
christhayer1- email service providers are not the ones at fault nor can they really do anything to prevent this problem. In many cases a computer may have a virus that just sends spam. Not much we can do with that.
boxbe.com It's a pain in the a--, but it works well once you set it up right, and spam NEVER gets in my inbox again, simply bcause I have never had the need to post my yahoo address, I simply post my boxbe.com address instead. If it's a person sending me the message, they'll type the letters in the box. If its a robot, they aint set up (yet) to pay the 25 cent fee.
1 Posted by smithbobby85 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:28PM EDT Report Abuse
This is so depressing.