Mon Feb 4, 2008 9:56PM EST
See Comments (19)
File under: You gotta be kidding me. Starting May 5, you'll have to pay an extra $25 to check a second piece of luggage on United Airlines. Unless there's rioting on the jetway, expect other airlines to follow suit. They always do.
United says the change will generate $100 million in revenue and cost savings a year... and it will probably cause untold havoc on actual planes, too. Why? Because all those people that would normally check a second bag will probably try to carry them on instead of paying the 25 dollar fee, and that will mean longer lines at security, less room in those already jam-packed overhead bins, and more of those people wandering up and down the cabin at takeoff time trying to find room for their bags at the last minute... only to have them gate checked at the last minute. Will those bags cost an extra $25, I wonder? Will the flight attendents collect the money? And will they prefer exact change as they do for that terrible mini bottle of white wine? But hey, it'll save United a couple of bucks, so let's all give 'em a hand.
Premier customers, international travelers, and anyone traveling in a pricier part of the plane will have the fee waived.
While I understand the airlines need to make money in an era of $4 gas, I can't help but feel like nickel and diming passengers isn't the way to do it. Southwest charges more to let you get on the plane first. And some airlines are even talking about charging for an assigned seat. On Northwest you pay extra to ride in the exit row.
Why not just raise prices modestly across the board and leave services the way they've been? Oh, right, because if you don't have the absolute "lowest fare," no one will ride on your plane. Meh.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
A lot of other airlies were already charging as much as $50 for the first extra bag, so I am not surprised. Some now even charge for ALL checked luggage, so double check policies before packing for a trip. I am glad I learned years ago how to pack super light - if they made over-sized fanny packs I could be good for a few days, if I did not have to dress up for anything.
Air Tran is already charging for "pre" assigned seats. If you select your seat on line during ticket purchase it will cost you $5.00 round trip for your selected seats (per person). Or, you can wait and take what you get at check in time for free.
They eliminated in-flight meals to save money. The food was awful so that was actually a blessing. Now they are going to charge $25 for the second piece of luggage? Are they going to charge $25 for each additional piece of luggage? This is an interesting trend coming about. Perhaps soon, there will be fees and surcharges for the use of blankets and for them to provide oxygen to passengers. Driving and Amtrak look more attractive everyday.
Big deal...prices for everything is increasing. I say kudos to United for giving a consumer an option to avoid extra charges. Really folks...can't you keep it to one checked bag and a carry on garment bag? Plus, you have your "personal item". I can fit quite a bit in my laptop roller bag. If your travel requires more than one bag, it is a fair assumption you will be gone a long time. Just divide the total paid over the number of days you are gone. It will be a lot easier to swallow that way.
They all charge for weight on luggage over 50lbs. It wouldn't be bad if that fee was round trip. 50 dollars to carry an additional 50lbs? That is 1 dollar a pound Why not charge people over 300lbs 1 additional dollar a pound? This is absurd when you do the math.
I think all airlines should eliminate carry on luggage anyway. I'm sick of every time I travel having to listen to the security people yelling about liquids and clear plastic bags, only to have some complete moron still try to get them through. I think it should be limited to what you can carry in your pockets or small bag (small enough to be comfortable in your lap the entire flight). There really is NO REASON to carry shampoo and make up on an airplane. Or the airlines could at least have an express lane through security for those of us that understand that we don't have to have everything we own on the plane with us.
Michael Anderson...you obviously did not comprehend my post. And the personal insults are way out of line. I am not ashamed of myself nor my attitude. I am entitled to my opinion, as you are entitled to yours. If you dont want to pay the extra money, dont bring an extra suitcase. It is that simple. If you dont want the airplane meal, dont buy it. It is that simple. If you dont want those four dollar Heinekens, dont buy them. It is that simple. I am not glad about additional costs. However, I am glad that I can avoid them as I wish. Aside from travel overseas, everybody should be able to keep it to one checked bag. You can always do a load of laundry at your destination if necessary! cokroach, your idea about no carry on is not bad. However, for people who have a garment bag and a checked luggage bag, they would be subject to the extra fee, since they no longer would be able to bring the garment bag onboard. Also, as a former weekly business traveler, the ability to bring a garment bag on board was a nice way to avoid checking bags in the first place. So for that reason, I cannot support that view, but I respect how you got there. There should indeed be an express line.
The issue as I see it is that consumers are paying more for less. Will we all stop flying? No. We don't protest anything. We're too busy trying to figure out a way to pay. Unless a company has a particularly odious product, Americans will pay. And pay through the nose -- on everything. When business/corporate customers start using online/virtual meeting modalities and people stop flying only then will United and their brethern finally bite dust and I say good riddance.
This is true crud. I'll never pay for that garbage; those greedy fools! I'd rather have freedom than saftey.
1 Posted by arash_mario on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:57PM EDT Report Abuse
I love the Meh at the end. Very funny.