The Microsoft Office 2007 "Kill Switch"

Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:20PM EST

See Comments (11)

In recent months, Internet chatter has hit boiling levels over Windows XP's Windows Genuine Advantage, which is Microsoft's way of assuring that you're using legitimate software and which nags you and nags you if it deems you are using a pirated version of the OS.

Well, it's about to get a whole lot worse. Early reports on Microsoft Vista said that it contained a "kill switch" that could radically disable the OS if Microsoft figured it was an illegal copy. (And there's no way Microsoft could ever be wrong about anything like that, could it?) But at the time, Microsoft hadn't committed to actually implementing the feature, so I breathed a bit easier.

Now arrives news that Office 2007, the natural companion to Vista, has anti-piracy features that are just as atrocious as Vista's. In "reduced-functionality mode" you will be unable to create new documents, edit existing documents, or save documents. It's called, of course, Office Genuine Advantage. Again, Microsoft is noncommittal on whether this feature will actually be used if it detects a "phony" serial number.

Now it's important to note that Office 2003 already has a feature much like this built in. Just like Windows XP, the software has to be validated (or activated) after it's installed (a one-time communication with Microsoft), or else it will cease to work. Many applications (even non-Microsoft ones) require activation, and that doesn't make this technology okay, but the WGA/OGA possibilities are far more invasive.

Namely, WGA and OGA communicate with Microsoft on an ongoing basis. You may activate the software when you buy it and have no problems, but if Microsoft later "decides" that your copy is actually pirated, it can turn that software off without warning. It can happen a week later or, in the case of those wrongly accused by XP's WGA, years after you bought your PC and tossed the documentation for it. Put simply, that's an abuse of power, and it's something that no user should accept lying down.

Still, there's no evidence that either Vista or Office 2007 will use these kill switch features, but Microsoft's avoidance of questions on the matter makes me nervous. I can only assume when Vista is in users' hands, we'll quickly see the truth of the matter, and then the lawsuits.

Comments on The Microsoft Office 2007 "Kill Switch"

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by darktruth06 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    When the time comes that Vista becomes the standard and XP is worthless and incompatible with most software, I'm switching to Mac. Microsoft is just getting ridiculous...are they purposely trying to lose their customers?

  • 2 Posted by taficke on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is ridiculous!!!! I have been a Windows user all my life but after this when it comes to buying a new computer i just might go with a Mac. Chris do you really think Microsoft will do this? This is absolutely ABSURD

  • 3 Posted by roy-chapman@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    What would the out come be if , a person or a group of people were able to memic and activate microsoft kill switch ? No one yet has invented a perfect program or soft ware.

  • 4 Posted by elwoodgolf on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    This new "kill switch" is rediculous. I said about 3 weeks ago that I have had it with Microsoft and all the bugs and flaws and inconsistencies and went out and bout the Apple MacBook. I have never looked back. I can run almost everything from this laptop and it is faster than my 2month old desktop. Mac is definitely going to over power Microsoft soon, especially if they continue with so called "improvements" like this. My hats off to you windows, you are the exact reason that Mac will continue to do incredibly well long after you have been eliminated.

  • 5 Posted by ohio3sd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have used MACs and Windows. MACs at work, windows at home. With the new MACs, there is nothing they can't do. The older ones were a little clunky. But my mini at work is faster than anthing I have ever used. I wish I would have pushed my husband harder to get a MAC at home.

  • 7 Posted by vegas.monaco on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have both a Windows XP Pro notebook and a PowerBook. I use both to test prototype to make sure everything works the same on both systems. I hate how XP is so really dull, but the 3rd party support is great. Running a Mac has been expensive. Apple seems to release an OS upgrade every year costing $100 a pop (Kitty Cat, Calico, Jaguar, Tiger, Leopard, whatever). Apple really knows how to gouge when it comes to its trendy looking OS. Both my machines are quick and reliable. Those with crashing computers need to stop buying eMachines, and other cheap hardware. Cut open an a Mac and you'll find parts from Intel, ATI, Fujitsu, Matsushita...the same brands found in a well-built PC. I have no loyalty, as I will have to run both Windows Vista and Leopard. Many MySpace pages will take down Safari in a heartbeat, and many will infect Windows with an STD. The hardcore gamers rock PCs, Macs are cool. The debate of Windows vs OS X is like HD DVD vs Blu-Ray. It really comes down to the consumers' voting with dollars.

  • 8 Posted by m-warren@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    Microsoft is becoming more and more like BIG BROTHER everyday what happen if you upgrade to a new computer, buy all new software from Microsoft

  • 9 Posted by hobint@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    Although I can understand that Microsoft is trying protect their interests, this auto cut-off feature could create big problems for them with lengthy and expensive lawsuits and would make them a lawyers paradise. Case in point: Over the years I have bought at least six different computers, given the old ones to my kids and relatives. I have also at different computer supply stores,purchased Windows XP operating systems and installed them on these so called "bare-bone computers. As I do have 2 desktop and 2 laptop computers nothing is more annoying than the message from Microsoft: "our records show that you have exceeded the number of time that you can use this securitycode,please us another", this entails calling Microsoft and have them issue a new one so you can continue the installation on your computer. But how many times can you call them before they in their wisdom decide that you are not honest. Personally I think that they should consider the fact that they do have a monopoly, let's face it their operating systems are getting better everytime and not many competitors are stepping up to the plate to try and beat them, all the more reason not to get allmighty and cut you off, what happened to discussing the issue first and evaluate the merits of each case. Most people are honest, so don't let a few of the shady ones push Microsoft into the lawyers corner ,all that does is make people disgusted and look for other operating systems, which if you see what is happening in Europe is not very beneficial to Microsoft, where other OS manufacturers have convinced Brussel (EU) to force Microsoft to divulge their patent secrets to the competition.So don't ram this company protection down our throat. Microsoft knows where the copy makers are so go after them, don't threaten your loyal honest customers.

  • 10 Posted by edward.stamper@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    I've got an Intel based Mac Mini and use both Windows XP Pro (Boot Camp) and Mac X (v10.4.10) and love the choice between the two OS's. I use my Mac side for personal business (word processing, emails, spreadsheets, etc...) and the XP side for games (the prices for PC games is much, much less than those for the Mac, plus there are a lot of games that aren't available for the Mac). Even though it's not a perfect solution, I really do love the set up I've got now.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment