Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:27PM EDT
See Comments (91)
Last month I looked into toner for my cheap Samsung laser printer and was shocked to see price quotes well over $100 for a simple black cartridge. (The printer itself costs only $160.)
Expensive printer ink has long been one of the biggest tech scams running. (The Register long ago noted it was seven times more expensive per milliliter than Dom Perignon champagne.) Fortunately, third-party vendors have come to the rescue with offers of private-label ink and toner, often for half the price of an "official" cartridge offered directly from the company. But, as expected, the printer manufacturers have fired back, claiming that off-brand toner and ink isn't as good as what you can get from the manufacturer. In at least one case, a company sued an off-brand cartridge maker to try to stop them from manufacturing cartridges, citng the DMCA. (On appeal, the cartridge maker won.)
Legalities aside, the question remains: Is off-brand ink really as good as that put out by HP, Epson, Canon, and the like? I bought the cheapie and ended up saving $60 on the price of a printer cartridge, but if the quality is going to be worse, was it really worth it? That's an especially important question if you're printing color photos instead of simple B&W paperwork.
This is a long way of pointing the way to PC World, which recently produced the most in-depth look at manufacturer vs. third-party ink that I've ever read. (Only inkjets were tested, however, not lasers.) The bottom line surprised me: In virtually all of its tests, "official" ink substantially outpaced third-party cartridges, both in original print quality and in resistance to fading under exposure to UV light. Only one printer, an HP PhotoSmart, had results showing prints made with third-party ink as generally as good as the manufacturer's ink. Don't believe it? Check out the slide show showing some of these prints side by side. A few of the examples are outright shocking.
The bright spot is that cheap ink, in addition to being, well, cheap, will often get you more prints from a cartridge, too. In scenarios where quality is not important (like printing simple text for personal use), third-party ink might make sense. The problem, of course, is that you never know when something you might actually need to look good will come up, and who wants to swap ink cartridges in and out?
If you're pondering an off-brand ink purchase, check out this piece immediately.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
The Walgreens cartridges are tested in the article as well...
But !! Walgreens has what I term a short fall in that they are very limited to the newer printer. I have an HP 990cse for over 6 years that has performed well on third party refills, but atlas Walgreens here in Crystal River, FL does not do the 990's
My suggestion ... buy a new printer, but keep the old one too. Dual-print. Use the new printer with manufacturer cartridges for important documents. Use your old printer with cheapo ink & re-manufactured cartridges. Best of both worlds.
Changing to Manufacturer ink cartridges makes as much sense as... changing to Glossy paper. You'd do it for quality prints but its not cost effective.
We have found that it's a mixed bag - some printers also do not like non-manufacturers ink and do weird things. So we test each unit. A lot of the newer units also have seperate cartridges for photo vs regular, so we can put the cheaper ink into the general slots and put the manufacturers photo ink into the photo slots. This way we both save on regular printing and get the best quality for photo prints - and both sides are happy because they both get sales.
I don't think pc world magazine is the best choice for the test. Most of it's income is from advertising.
I've been very happy with the inks that I've gotten from MIS inks for Epson printers. There are some other good ink producers around, too, like Piezography. I think that part of the problem with the PC World article is that they tested some of the cheapest inks around. There is a happy medium between paying full price for the manufacturers cartridges or buying the cheapest slop that you can find in the discount bin.
Be very careful as some printers have software that will not accept the refills.
I have a HP laser printer. The HP original equipment manufacturer cartridge costs me $77.00, including sales tax. An office equipment business here has a refill shop which also replaces internal cartridge parts when these are worn and they charge me $39.00 including tax for refilling the empty HP cartridge. They work very well and they have guarantee that if they do not perform well the shop repairs it. These refills last the same and sometimes a lot longer than brand new HP cartridges and the quality is the same. So I am saving #38.00 each time I refill...plus I am recycling...Great!!
1 Posted by drfhyde on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:48PM EDT Report Abuse
Walgreens has a service whereby they refill your cartridges, $10 for black, $15 for color. Dr. Frank Hyde