Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:17PM EDT
See Comments (15)
Yes, we're seeing more and more headlines about viruses, worms, and other types of malware targeting the Mac. But before you start panicking, read on.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
One reason that Macs are less vulnerable to virus is that virus don't spread well with a platform that is only 5% of the installed base. This is just simple math of viral expansion. if you have 90% of installed base then the change of you interacting with a similar host is high, 90% when you send an email or even chat. But when you are 5% then you are likely to email the 90% and your virus will not spread well. Mac owners are not necessarily emailing generally other mac owners. Simple mathematics favors Windows viruses and helps discourage malicious code writers from targeting macs. it is just not efficient and the potential for viral explosion of their code is strongly diminished. Frank Levinson
Only 0.16% of MACs ever get infected. I like those odds! But a good reason why this number is so low is how the OS was developed. It made it very hard to wedge a virus in there to do damage to the system. Any damage done by most MAC viruses is very specific and easily automatically rectifiable. That is definitely the sign of a GOOD OS.
The vulnerabilities in Windows made it easy for even the simple hackers to enter. "50,000 Windows viruses (according to some estimates, at least) are currently circulating in the wild". I have several security software programs running to protect from intrusion openings that were left in Windows OS. It slows down my system but is necessary. Bill Gates made billions on his sorry-a operating system and now is giving it away by the bushels instead of fixing his product. What a fraud.
All I can say is that I've owned Macs since 1984 and have NEVER been hacked until last year. I now have the awesome, completely wireless MacBook Air. I have never used Norton or other "anti-virus" rip-offs on my Macs. I have never been hacked on the OS-X side but, wait: I was indeed hacked ONCE when I installed Windoze Vista on a partition on my last PowerBook. I used Boot Camp, and within minutes (I'm not kidding!) a rootkit had been installed on my Windoze partition. So bye-bye Windoze. The only reason I had it was to install my Sony Reader books for travel. I've dumped that pig and have a Kindle on order. It just totally amazes me when people say, "Oh, I can't use OS-X at work." Chances are you're using MS-Office and it is totally transparent on Mac. You don't need to be a slave to M$. Another issue: "I can't play games on a Mac." LOL! What I hear all the time is most Windoze people are only staying with Windoze because the "games aren't there for Mac." That tells me that Windoze people are only using Windoze to play games. Games. Unbelievable. What about stand-alone game consoles? And then get the best OS (and machines) on the planet! Unless all you care about is "playing games." Me, I compute. You, ??? BTW, the last issue with an Apple "bug" (if you will) was a macro in MS-Word...created by Guess Who? Microsoft. In 1997. It just seems to me that all Windoze users care about is gaming. How sad is that? Me, I run my entire household on Macs. Never been hacked, never had to pay for anti-virus software, never had to call Geek Squad. How about you?
Due to the fact that Macs are based on Linux schemes such as Darwin, it is impossible for a virus to penetrate their inner workings. It is my own belief that those who make the virus protection suites such as McAffe and Norton are the makers of the viruses that you see. The question that I always ask myself is just how do these companies know the 500,000+ virus definitions if they don't create the viruses themselves. Even with other individuals in the world creating them, it seems impossible for a company to find that many viruses to use for definitions. I own an iMac G3 and a Compaq Presario Laptop and I have never used a virus scan and I am positive that there aren't any infections in my computer.
Ask any programmers if they can back their name behind their work! There are no such thing as 100% bug free programming, given be it OS or applications. While it may be true that install based for Macs are lower and most hackers or virus creators doesn't even want to bother with it, but that does means it would not happen. Try putting these macs without protection onto the internet and see for yourself. My work involve datacenters and never come across even one macs server. Does anyone know if they are even EAL or common criteria certified?
i have used windows my whole life and never once been hacked. the only protection i ever used is the free stuff like ccleaner and spybot. my firewall is the windows firewall. my browser is ie 7.0. those that say windows is very vulnerable is full of hot air.
You refer to RSPlugA as a "Trojan" while you refer to the others as Trojan Horse. This is wrong. A Trojan Horse does not contain Trojans. It contains other Greeks who come out of the horse to attack the Trojans.
Macs can't get viruses,,,they can however get trojans and worms. Luckily no one is really bothering to attack my mac. The truth is that Windows because of its design is actually more prone to attack because of the poorly written code and lack of built in security model. The truth is you are more liable to get exploited by other means than viral infection.
1 Posted by sharon_0730 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:17PM EDT Report Abuse
All of the information is common-sense, but I would still get the anitvirus for a Mac still.