UK bans "misleading" iPhone ad

Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:27PM EDT

See Comments (5)

"All the parts of the Internet are on the iPhone," the TV ad crowed—well, all the parts except for the Flash and Java ones, that is.

The BBC reports that the Advertising Standards Authority of the UK has banned the ad, which you can watch right here, from running again in its current form.

Apple had argued that the phrase "all the parts of the Internet" meant every page on the Web, but the British ad authority disagreed, concluding that the ad "gave a misleading impression of the Internet capabilities of the iPhone."

"They made a very general claim that you can see the Internet in its entirety, and actually that's not quite true," a ASA spokesperson told the BBC. "Because the iPhone doesn't support Flash or Java, you couldn't really see the Internet in its full glory."

The ad in question does, indeed, focus on the Web browsing capabilities of the iPhone. "You never know which parts of the Internet you'll need," says the chirpy voice on the iPhone ad. "The 'do you need suncream part'? Or the 'can you really afford this part?' Which is why all the parts of the Internet are in the iPhone."

Way back when he unveiled the first iPhone back in January 2007, Steve Jobs called the iPhone the "Internet in your pocket"—a glib phrase that always rubbed me the wrong way, given that Flash modules on Web pages (and believe me, they're everywhere) appear only as little blue question marks on the mobile Safari browser.

Adobe has been saying for months that it's ready and waiting to bring Flash support to the iPhone, but so far, no dice.

Back in March, Jobs said that the mobile Flash Lite player "is not capable of being used with the Web," while the desktop Flash "performs too slow to be useful" on the iPhone. "There's this missing product in the middle," Jobs said.

So, what do you think: Did Apple get what it deserved for the ad, or is the ASA being too picky? And for that matter, who's ready for Flash support on the iPhone?

Related:
iPhone ad rapped as 'misleading' [BBC News]

 

 

Comments on UK bans "misleading" iPhone ad

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by allularmilo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yeah, Apple got what they deserved. Flash and Java are two really big parts of the Internet today, and if you can't use them on the iPhone, then the entire Internet is far from being on the iPhone.

  • 2 Posted by surferduude132 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree, I love Apple, But I do web design, and well a lot of the sites I build have major parts in Flash. They need to support it. If adobe is will to work with Apple, the Job's needs to step up.

  • 3 Posted by coolkyle4@snet.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    they got wut they deserved. but i hate the iphone, so i dont want flash on the iphone, and if they do put it on there, then other smartphones should have flash able to be on them too, sidekick, blackberry, etc

  • 4 Posted by ddemase on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    Absolutely, Apple got what they deserved on the iPhone. They have puffed up the browsing capabilities to the point where its dirty little secrets have been ignored far too long. I have been a long time user of WinMo, and have owned an iPod touch since the beginning of the year. So this little "feature" or two has irked me along the way to the point where I wondered why no one else was complaining.

  • 5 Posted by notintheleastbit on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    Steve Jobs needs to be punched in the face if he is keeping flash support from the iPhone. Just about everything I do on the internet involves flash, making safari on my iPhone a mere taunt instead of the amazing tool I know it could be.

More Posts: 1

Post a Comment