Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:18AM EST
See Comments (213)
At last, the music industry admits what we've known for years: That filing music-swapping lawsuits against teenagers, little old ladies, and corpses is a fool's errand (not to mention an expensive headache for the defendants). But don't worry—the RIAA has something new up its sleeves.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Hate to be a nitpicker, but could the picture be any more ridiculous? Connecting the headphone jacks of two MP3 players won't share a thing, that should be obvious.
If the masses are stupid enough to follow this rule and stop downloading music it would just show how dumb our society is. if everyone keeps d/l music and everyones internet gets cut the isp's will be out of business so why would they do that, this is just a scare tactic all you have to do is not be scared keep doing what your doing, maybe a couple people will get there internet cut off, but as long as we keep doing it they will get there service back trust me everything is about money sadly! and isp's can't afford to cut everyone off
One thing hasn't been talked about and that is why even download buy one cd and have other's buy a different one,have a group of people all buy different ones. Pass them around let the people upload them into their own computer. Then they can make their own. If not the cd's then put them on these 2 to 8 gigs sticks and pass them around you get quality music not some with what you don't know pops and hisses. This way nobody knows what you are doing. No ISP'S involved
All simple, it will not work, just a scare tactic. There is always a way, and as long there is CD's then people will always burn and share. I personally don't have a MP3 player, but common sense will always work over greed. I think that music companies are setting people up, finding ways to sue people. If the government could do something they would have done so, a long time ago. Don't be tricked people, your tax money has already paid for it!
So say I go to Starbucks (or any one of the other countless FREE wireless internet providers around any city) and download/share music. Who would they go after? Sounds like an impossible thing to police to me. Music is now FREE and multi million dollar rock artists/ music companies will be a thing of the past. True artists will continue to make good music.
"True artists will continue to make good music?" And do what for food and shelter?
I suppose everybody besides me knows what RIAA is? Might be good in an article which is all about the RIAA to tell what those letters stand for in the first paragraph?
The people who believe that your internet provider will cut your internet because you d/l music are stupid. Do not fall for the stupid scare tactic. The internet service providers are not going to cut off internet just to loose money. That is what this whole thing is about. MONEY!!!!
I find this funny when are they gona start caring about people videotaping movies and putting them on the web. people will find a way around this they always do.
1 Posted by hotel528 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:20PM EDT Report Abuse
They finally start to make some sense. The giver pays, the receiver takes. You go after someone who shares, you don't go after someone who downloads. If someone is so generous to share, that someone pays for everything. Just like TV, you can watch the show for free because someone sponsored. They don't go after the watchers.