Femtocells aim to boost indoor cell reception

Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:47PM EST

See Comments (46)

Can't get a decent cell signal in your living room? I know the feeling. That's why more and more carriers are offering femtocells: compact, antenna-equipped boxes that use your home broadband network to boost cell reception. Clever idea—although you'll pay extra for the privilege, of course.

Sprint has had its own femtocell device—the Airave—on sale for more than a year now, while Verizon Wireless announced its own femtocell service this week. That leaves AT&T, which is rumored to have a femtocell product in the works, and T-Mobile, which offers something a little different: Unlimited HotSpot Calling (formerly known as T-Mobile HotSpot @Home).

So, how do femtocells work? You can read up on the nuts and bolts at Wikipedia, but roughly speaking, they act as cell network signal repeaters (with an effective range of about 5,000 square feet), piggybacking onto your home broadband network to boost patchy coverage—good news for those of us with terrible reception in our homes and apartments. (I live in a 150-year-old-plus brownstone in Brooklyn, and unless I stand by a window, callers can't hear me.)

The femtocell device itself looks a lot like a standard Wi-Fi router; just plug it into your home network via Ethernet and get ready for more bars. In Sprint's case, its Airave femtocell also comes with a GPS receiver, intended as both a 911 locator and to make sure that you're only using the device in Sprint's coverage area (and not, say, in China or something).

Verizon Wireless is the latest U.S. carrier to jump on the femtocell bandwagon, just having announced its "Network Extender" earlier this week. The box is pricey at $249, and it doesn't support 3G EV-DO data; that said, once you fork over the cash, there aren't any additional monthly fees.

Sprint's Airave femtocell (which uses the same Samsung hardware as Verizon's Network Expander) is way cheaper at $99.99, but you'll have to cough up a monthy service fee: $4.99 a month for "basic" coverage, or $10/month for unlimited Airave calling on a single-line Sprint account (the unlimited charge goes up to $20 a month for multi-line family plans).

AT&T has yet to offer its own femtocell service, but based on this customer survey that's making the rounds, I'd expect to hear an announcement in the near future.

Finally, there's T-Mobile, which doesn't do femtocells at all. Instead, the carrier has a service called Unlimited HotSpot Calling (formerly known as T-Mobile HotSpot @Home, and not to be confused with the new @Home "landline" service), which lets you make unlimited calls over Wi-Fi for $10 a month. (You're supposed to use a special, $29.99 T-Mobile router with the service, but as this review notes, Unlimited HotSpot Calling should work just fine with your existing Wi-Fi network).

Pretty nice—but there's a catch. While any Sprint or Verizon phone will work with their respective femtocell units, you must use one of T-Mobile's UMA-enabled Wi-Fi handsets for Unlimited HotSpot calling. Supported models include the BlackBerry Pearl, the Samsung T229 and Katalyst, and the Nokia 6301 and 7510 handsets—and for now, that's it.

So, who out there would be willing to pay extra for better cell coverage indoors? Or would you rather just stick with a landline?

Comments on Femtocells aim to boost indoor cell reception

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by larmo33 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    Lured by a new A T & T bundle package. I have finally joined the rest of the world, by getting a cell phone. I never really wanted one, even though it is of great value in an emergency. The various Carrier scams, (oh, I mean plans), made me very cautious about getting one also. I intend to keep my land line, and not have to worry about finding a "hot spot" in my apartment, buy a femtocell, or use a T-Mobile solution.

  • 2 Posted by nighteye19 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    You got a cell phone? Welcome to the 1990s! You know that your TV won't work in a few weeks without a special box? (since I'm assuming you are using a b/w tv with an antenna)

  • 3 Posted by dale_kruger on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    For the cost I guess I can get close to the window for a scenic view. I buy my phones. No long term contracts. You really have to watch the fine print. What you are getting ( need) may be two different things. If I wanted to text I would not need a microphone and speaker.

  • 4 Posted by larmo33 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    Dear nighteye19 - You made me LAUGH!No.., Really Dude, Dudette? I've built my own gaming computer for about $3000. I have a 24 and a 30 inch monitor. Plus a two year old, brand name computer with a 3.2 CPU. Plus a $2000+ surround sound system. Whatchu got? Silly me! I just didn't fall for the outlandish, umm. "plans", the major carriers were offering til I actually only had to increase my monthly bill by a few bucks to get a cell. Call me a stupid caveman. That's okay! ;-)

  • 5 Posted by randellwall@ymail.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'll stick with my Magic Jack broadband landline with unlimitied local and long distance and can go with me ANYWHERE broadband is available for $19.95 a YEAR. And I do mean ANYWHERE, WORLDWIDE.

  • 6 Posted by mac77daddy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have my internet bundle that comes with High speed cable connection, basic digital cable including DVR and landline with unlimited long distance and local calling. I also keep my T-mobile plan because I need to be available at all times. I like having the use of both in my home because if my wife is on one I can use another or yet another. I suppose if you don't get a bundle in you area and you don't get reception with your cell phone it would be cheaper than your regular old telephone service to get one of these femtocells.

  • 7 Posted by s75holman on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    Unbelievable that companies are going to charge you more for a weakness in their own products. These femtocells should be given out to customers free. We already pay crazy amounts of money for a mediocre service. But really I can go for buying a femtocell, but paying a monthly service fee. Now that is really crazy.

  • 8 Posted by etaylor7266 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    These new gadgets seem perfect but be careful and do read the fine print on all new devices and phones. I found out that purchasing a new phone they put me on a new 2 year contract and I found out after the fact and now I am obligated to this company for 2 more years. When I started out I was not going to commit to a long term agreement.

  • 9 Posted by somebodys_here on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    The Verizon box is expensive, but no monthly fees is the way to go. Me like (since you already pay $75 a month for service anyway).

  • 10 Posted by ozarkstpilot on Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:40AM EST Report Abuse

    these cell phone companys are as crooked as hedge fund managers on wall street...i.e. Enron types... they provide poor service, force LOAN SHARK CONTRACTS, then want us to pay more just to get a signal off an overloaded network they are too stingy to upgrade to an acceptable level of service quality, due to their executive's wildly outrageous pay and retirement plans. modern tech?..bull, this is a ripoff paying for phone service where you have to go outside to get a signal, or wanting us to pay more for something they should provide to customers in the first place...A USEABLE SIGNAL at a fair price.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Post a Comment