Hands-on Review: Shure SE530PTH Earphones

Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:26AM EDT

See Comments (16)

The folks at Shure—manufacturers of earbuds that are literally worth their weight in gold—just rolled out their latest line of high-end earphones. Tech Advisor Christopher Null had his way with the mid-range Shures, including the $250 SE310 and $350 SE420 models, and I just finished testing the company's new flagship, the SE530, which retails for a whopping $450 (or $500 with a bundled "Push-to-Hear" microphone). After spending the weekend (and a couple of coast-to-coast flights) with these stellar in-ear babies, I can safely say these are the best earbuds I've ever heard—and that I'll never, ever buy.

First off, let's talk about the packaging. I'm not talking about those clear plastic casings that you have to rip apart with a pair of scissors; oh no, the SE530 comes encased in nothing less than a four-inch, stainless-steel cube. Slide the top off and you'll find the earbuds tucked inside molded foam rubber, along with a tough zippered travel case that includes a potpourri of earpieces and extension cords. Nice.

The earphones themselves look pretty impressive. The curved, glossy earbuds are slightly bigger than those of the SE420, and the plastic-coated wires felt satisfyingly solid-as one would hope, given the SE530's lofty price tag. You also get a couple of extension cords, including a nine-inch cord good for fitness buffs and a longer, 38-inch wire for everyday use, as well as an adapter for the quarter-inch headphone jack on your receiver. While a wide selection of plastic earbud sleeves comes in the package, I'm in total agreement with Chris—the yellow foam earpieces make for the best fit.

And how do the SE530's sound, you ask? Let's just say that my ears were in heaven. According to Shure, the SE530 packs in three "microspeakers" per earbud, including a dedicated tweater and a pair of woofers. While I didn't have an electron microscope to verify the existence of said speakers, my ears certainly heard the difference. The deep bass and high-end bleats of Photek thundered in my head, and for once, I couldn't detect any low-end distortion, even when I cranked the volume. Next I slipped the DVD of "Casino Royale" into my PowerBook and sat back as the bullets whizzed convincingly by my ears, and I could practically feel the individual trumpets blare the James Bond theme. The foam earpieces had no trouble blocking engine noise during my flight, and the Push-to-Hear add-on made it easy to switch over to the in-line microphone for announcements from the cabin.

Alright then, a rave review—so why won't I be buying the SE530 for myself? Simple: there's just no way I could ever justify spending $500 on a pair of earbuds, no matter how amazing they sound. I'd say that $200 is my absolute ceiling for a pair of earbuds, and according to Chris' review of the $250 SE310, its sound doesn't even measure up to the $350 SE420 earphones, which are a step down from the top-of-the-line SE530's. Believe me, I love great sound as much as the next geek, but personally, I'd rather spend $500 on, I dunno...a next-gen gaming console, or an HDMI receiver, or even a new flat-screen display—with money to spare.

Comments on Hands-on Review: Shure SE530PTH Earphones

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by peteskold on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    Okay, I agree that 350$, the least expensive price I have found online, is a LOT for ear buds. HOWEVER, if you bought a home surround sound system would you go "cheap" on the speakers? I spent a lot for my 80gig iPod and I figure that I should get great sound out of it, no? I am working on this in my mind, and your review helped.. but I am NOT sure that spending that much money is wrong if it is great quality. I am also worried on how well these ear buds would hold up to being used and abused in the real world... I may buy them.. and I am NOT rich.

  • 2 Posted by j_hebeler on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    $500 for perfection come on. In order to hear anything close with a regular speaker set up would cost above 10K. Perfection at $500 is a bargain. These put you right next to the artist - you won't believe the experience until you hear them. I am old enough not to expect to be surprised - I was not just surprised I was shocked.

  • 3 Posted by mikeparlett on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    My question is, are the better than the Bose QC3s for noise cancellation? Has anyone done a comparison? Bose QC3 are $349 list price.

  • 4 Posted by arsenelupiniii2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    Mike, QC3s cancel noise whereas SExxx earbuds will isolate you from it. The SE series buds will work better on dynamic, higher pitched sounds, while the QC3s work better at getting rid of dronish background noise. I own the SE310s and am ordering a pair of these.

  • 5 Posted by pluslentement on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    As for holding up in the real world, Shure is fantastic with customer service. I've had several pairs of Shures replaced when developing problems, no questions asked. So, I wouldn't be worried in that case.

  • 6 Posted by jhma7193 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    Just received my Shure SE530 today. The quality is just awesome! The foam is fitting comfortable in my ear. Yes it is too pricey($400 including shipping), I think in the long run it is worth while investment. I ordered through Dell. Check for specials!

  • 7 Posted by nothotatall on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    If I was rich or crazy enough to spend this much for the ultimate pleasurable audio perfection to date, I would shurly worry to death about: having to replace these earphones if the wires should get 'shorted' during normal use. Or accidentally crushed by or tripping over them, or going to bed with these babies on, and then strangled, or worse, worried that the next version would even be (inconcievably) better, making me stuck with these substandard models. No, no no. This is just too much worry for my mind, heart, ears and money. I'll just settle for a pair of phones I could enjoyably live with... minus the worry.

  • 8 Posted by jrgwice on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'd just like to throw in that Shure has been just as impressive in the customer service arena as in their product refinement. I have a pair of E4C and absolutely love them. When I accidentally get them caught in the hedge-clippers, Shure even replaced them under warranty! I've had my Shures for about 3 years now and couldn't imagine on settling for anything less. Gonna have to try out the 530s.

  • 9 Posted by bowwowwowworld on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    I got a pair of E4Cs two years ago (I believe they're the predecessor of the SE420s). They retailed for around $300, but I was able to get them for under $200 online. They've been fabulous...and now I'm drooling about the 530s. Thanks...because I need to spend MORE money. :-( But I'm a consultant, so I'm flying all the time...

  • 10 Posted by alaskanmeese on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have no tried these, but I have owned several pairs of Shure E2s, which have been just perfect for me. ($99) However, I have owned several pairs because after my use (an average of 5 hours per day) the wire begins to keep the curve of where it wraps around my ear and then the wire starts to split. I am not sure if these headphones have the same problem, but I can get a year or two out of my set, and that's reasonable for $99.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment