Wed Jun 6, 2007 8:48AM EDT
See Comments (185)
I played with the new $99 Sidekick iD for a few days, trying to imagine my life as a hipster, texting friends and surfing the web. My imagination came up short. That's when I turned to the kids—all in their early twenties—to set me straight about the legacy and the limitations of the Sidekick iD.
In 2002, the original Sidekick featured a black and white display and a full-size QWERTY keyboard. It was the full sized keyboard (all the better for texting you, my dear) that garnered the affection of the texting/surfing crowd.
Next came a color version of the Sidekick. Paris Hilton lost hers and suddenly everyone else wanted theirs. The Sidekick II was a hit, albeit at $300, an expensive one.
Sidekick 3: "I Never Hated a Phone so Much"
The Sidekick 3, according to my youth connections, was an abject failure. Like its ancestors, it has a phone, web browser, email manager, and camera. It also added a faster processor, support for a faster data network, and a music player. My reviewers say the phone was bulky and the trackball never worked for very long without gumming up. They say the phone's display screen was terrible and, worst of all, the voice quality of the phone was bad. At $300, the Sidekick 3 is way too expensive. (I'm still not clear whether allowances or odd jobs gave these kids their phone experiences.) One 21-year-old student said, "Uggghhh. I never hated a phone so much."
A Phone of Redemption
The new Sidekick iD, says the same 21-year-old, is a phone of redemption. She's so savvy about this phone thing that she explained how she saw this as T-Mobile's chance to endear itself to the texting crowd again. T-Mobile cut the price to under $100 and cut a lot of the features, too. The iD, unlike the Sidekick 3, has no camera, MP3 player, Bluetooth, or SD slot. It's got these plastic-y looking bumper guard type edges that come in different colors, allowing you to style your own.
The two best things about the iD are that it's only $99 and it's really good at the things the Sidekicks are notoriously good at: emailing, texting, and surfing the web. The iD makes things like importing your addresses into the phone easy and setting up text messaging trivially easy.
Like the Sidekick 3, the iD uses a trackball to navigate the menus. The trackball can feel a bit loose, causing me to scroll past my menu targets. The color display screen is good, though not as bright and clear as phones like the Treo and Pearl.
The bottom line? The Sidekick iD maintains what makes the Sidekicks distinctive: its swivel open, pop-up, and start typing screen. Reviewers call it the kiddie BlackBerry. But, I wouldn't buy this phone for my kids because it's a better texting and surfing machine than it is a phone. And they wouldn't buy it on their own because for $99 they'd want a built-in camera phone. And, if money is really an object for a family, they'll do better than $99 with a host of inexpensive phones.
The new Sidekick iD will appeal most to those still enamored of photos like the one here from Geeksugar. Sidekick iD is an "it" for texting maniacs or those still reading Tiger Beat.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I love my SK3, couldnt have asked for a better device. Sure it sucks for phone purposes, but it's addicting and you'll find yourself doing everything with the key board rather than calling. The skID is for kids who want to roll with the big dogs, but cant afford to.
my and my family are phone shoping and this sidekick was at the top for me and my sister(15)and two twin brothers(18)so thank you and this was sent to all of them. ya it might not change their minds but it will shur help me! THANK YOU
I'm definitely sticking with my Treo. Sidekicks are over-glorified. With the price lowering they're going to be everywhere, too. I'd rather stick with a phone not many people can have, with as many features as you can possibly think of (being able to install anything you could possibly want and all), without any drawbacks. Price may be a drawback, but that's what makes it stand out from the "15 year old who got their phone from mommy" crowd.
i have a SK3 and i love it...i knew when i bought it that it wasnt the greatest device for talking but its not as bad as your article makes it seem. The difficulties talking thru the SK3 can be easily fixed if you use a bluetooth headset, the track ball only gets "gummy" if you dont take care of your SK3, and the problem with the screen brightness can be adjusted through the menu. and i honestly dont have a problem with the 300 price tag of the SK3. i look around and i see everyone with the same phones (Razr, Pebl, etc) and i rarely see someone with a SK3. Knowing that i have a phone that other people dont have makes me feel better about my choice of getting it. and like alikatb925 said, the skID is for kids that wish they had a SK3.
Whattt??? The SK3 is the a tight phone! I really like the phone quality and i'm really overall satisfied with it. Just like in everything though, the phone does have some faults. The first and most important to me, is the camera on the phone. It is kind of bad, i really dont like taking many pictures on it, i'd rather just use my regular dig cam. Besides the cam, the next thing on the list is that you cant receive photos or send photo messages. This sucks! If i ever, which is rare, that i take a pic and want to send it to someone, i cant, i have to like load it on my comp and email it. By then, i'd rather drive to my friends house and show them. Anyway, besides that, I love this phone. I am so glad they have the sidekick thing where its 20 bucks for unlimited browser and unlimited texts because I do text a lottttt and browse. Anyway, i think the ID is just the cheap knockoff of the SK! Well hope that helped!!!
ron benitez... ive sent pics from my sidekick many times. maybe you have a faulty sk3?? o.0
i love my SK3, no too many people have it which is cool, yeah its has some flaws like all phones, but this is great for texting, email, web, the camera can be iffy, but over all the phone is sleek and i dont use it all for talking, so that elimnates that issue. I think the SKID is a knockoff and looks cheap... ill pass and stick to my $300 SK3, whick is the real thing!
Mkay. i agree with some of the other people the SKID is a rip off. if it cant take pics then count me out. i dont got a cell yet but this acticle helped me because now i know stuff bout the SKs. i mite get a 2 or 3 def not an SKID. With my citcumstances than $300 isnt that much. I have seen flip phones that had better features than a SKID. Thank you yahoo for helping me know about this device. The SKs sound addicting but that aint too bad. Thanks again Lindsey
omg i was dying for a sk3. i cant believe its crap. atleast i found out soon.but if its so crappy y duz it cost so much? that dosnt make sense!
1 Posted by mdlaux on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:14PM EDT Report Abuse
I have had the sk2 and 3, sure the 3 has issues, but it's faster, and has an mp3 player. Also the buttons are plastic, instead of a ruberized sheet used on the sk2. Besides it being as sensitive as a french man, it's overall a pretty good phone. Mike